<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ophthalmology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Офтальмология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ophthalmology in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1816-5095</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2500-0845</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Ophthalmology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18008/1816-5095-2022-4-815-821</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ophthalmology-1991</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ И ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL &amp; EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценка эффективности различных вариантов периметрии с удвоением пространственной частоты при мониторинге глаукомного процесса</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Assessment of the Effectiveness of Different Variants of Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in Monitoring the Glaucoma Process</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8389-0421</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Симакова</surname><given-names>И. Л.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Simakova</surname><given-names>I. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор медицинских наук, доцент кафедры офтальмологии</p><p>ул. Боткинская, 21, Санкт‑Петербург, 194044, Российская Федерация</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD., Associate Professor</p><p>Botkinskaya str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">irina.l.simakova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-6993</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Куликов</surname><given-names>А. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kulikov</surname><given-names>A. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор медицинских наук, профессор, начальник кафедры офтальмологии</p><p>ул. Боткинская, 21, Санкт‑Петербург, 194044, Российская Федерация</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Associate Professor, head of the Ophthalmology department</p><p>Botkinskaya str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-8437</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Тихоновская</surname><given-names>И. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tikhonovskaya</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>врач‑офтальмолог диагностического отделения клиники офтальмологии</p><p>ул. Боткинская, 21, Санкт‑Петербург, 194044, Российская Федерация</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>ophthalmologist</p><p>Botkinskaya str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 194044, Russian Federation </p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБВОУ ВПО «Военно-медицинская академия имени С.М. Кирова» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>815</fpage><lpage>821</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Симакова И.Л., Куликов А.Н., Тихоновская И.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Симакова И.Л., Куликов А.Н., Тихоновская И.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Simakova I.L., Kulikov A.N., Tikhonovskaya I.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/1991">https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/1991</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель: сравнить диагностическую эффективность нестандартной периметрии и стандартной автоматизированной периметрии (САП) при мониторинге начальной стадии первичной открытоугольной глаукомы (ПОУГ).</p></sec><sec><title>Пациенты и методы</title><p>Пациенты и методы. В исследовании участвовали 30 больных (46 глаз) начальной ПОУГ в возрасте от 30 до 65 лет (54,9 ± 1,3 года), которые находились под динамическим наблюдением в сроки от 3 до 4 лет (3,50 ± 0,68 года). Всем испытуемым, помимо стандартного офтальмологического обследования, выполняли пороговую программу «24-2» периметрии по Humphrey II, авторскую модификацию периметрии с удвоением пространственной частоты — Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry в виде двух пороговых стратегий: известной «FDT-16» и новой «FDT-64». Состояние диска зрительного нерва (ДЗН) оценивали с помощью HRT 3 (Heidelberg Retinа Tomograph, Германия) и ОКТ — Topcon 3D OCT-2000 («TOPCON», Япония). При мониторинге дополнительно выполняли ОКТ RTVue FD-OCT («Optovue», США), оценивая показатели комплекса ганглиозных клеток (КГК) сетчатки.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Регулярное диспансерное наблюдение, выполнение назначенного лечения способствовали стабилизации глаукомы, о чем свидетельствовали стабильность средних значений индексов MD по данным всех трех пороговых стратегий, но достоверно (p = 0,000) — только по данным САП. По критерию количества скотом имелась слабовыраженная, но статистически значимая отрицательная динамика по всем сравниваемым стратегиям. По результатам структурной оценки ДЗН (размеру экскавации) получена слабо выраженная отрицательная динамика как по данным HRT, так и по данным ОКТ. Взаимосвязь средних значений индекса MD, количества скотом по данным трех стратегий и размера экскавации по данным HRT и ОКТ у больных начальной ПОУГ оказалась более сильной и достоверной по данным «FDT-16», а характеристики корреляции с результатами «24-2» HFA II, «FDT-64» во многом совпадали.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Достоверная корреляционная связь между структурными и функциональными показателями свидетельствует о целесообразности использования «FDT-64» в комплексе с САП не только при диагностике начальной стадии глаукомы, но и при оценке ее течения. Уровень чувствительности результатов «FDT-64» (100 %) по сравнению с «FDT-16» (88 %) у пациентов с ПОУГ был выше, в связи с этим «FDT-64» целесообразно использовать в сложных диагностических случаях и при мониторинге глаукомы.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose: To compare the diagnostic effectiveness of non-standard perimetry and standard automated perimetry (SAP) during earlystage monitoring of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p></sec><sec><title>Patients and methods</title><p>Patients and methods. The study involved 30 patients (46 eyes) with early-stage of POAG, aged 30 to 65 years (54.9 ± 1.3), who were under ongoing monitoring for 3 to 4 years (3.50 ± 0.68 years). All subjects, in addition to the standard ophthalmological examination, performed the threshold program “24-2” perimetry using the Humphrey II, the own modification of Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry, in the form of 2 threshold strategies: the wellknown “FDT-16” and the new “FDT-64”. The condition of the optic nerve head (ONH) was assessed using HRT 3 (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, Germany) and OCT — Topcon 3D OCT- 2000 (TOPCON, Japan). During monitoring, RTVue FD-OCT (Optovue, USA) was additionally performed, evaluating the parameters of the retinal ganglion cell complex (GCC).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Regular follow-up, the implementation of the prescribed treatment contributed to the stabilization of glaucoma, as evidenced by the stability of the average MD index values according to all 3 threshold strategies, but reliably (p = 0.000) only according to SAP data. According to the criterion of the number of scotomas, there was a weakly expressed, but statistically significant negative dynamics for all the compared strategies. According to the results of the structural assessment of the ONH (the size of the excavation), a weakly pronounced negative dynamics was obtained in dynamics according to both HRT and OCT data. The average MD index values, the number of scotomas according to the three perimeter strategies and the excavation size based on HRT and OCT in patients with early-stage of POAG turned out to be stronger and more significant using the “FDT-16”, and the correlation characteristics with the results of “24-2” HFA II, “FDT-64” largely coincided.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. A reliable correlation between structural and functional parameters indicates the feasibility of using “FDT-64” in combination with SAP not only in for the diagnosis of the early-stage of glaucoma, but also in assessing its course. The sensitivity level of the results of “FDT-64” (100 %) compared to “FDT-16” (88 %) in patients with POAG was higher, therefore, “FDT-64” is advisable to use in complex diagnostic cases and in monitoring glaucoma.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>FDT-периметрия</kwd><kwd>HM FDT-периметрия</kwd><kwd>глаукомная оптиконейропатия</kwd><kwd>мониторинг глаукомы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>FDT perimetry</kwd><kwd>HM FDT perimetry</kwd><kwd>glaucomatous optic neuropathy</kwd><kwd>glaucoma monitoring</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симакова И.Л., Тихоновская И.А. Эффективность различных вариантов периметрии с удвоением пространственной частоты в диагностике некоторых оптиконейропатий. Национальный журнал глаукома. 2022;21(1):23–36. DOI: 10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-23-35</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simakova I.L., Tikhonovskaya I.A. Еvaluation of the effectiveness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of optic neuropathies. National Journal of Glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2022;21(1):23–36 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-23-35</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iwasaki A., Sugito M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only visual field test using Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002;134(4):529–537. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01684-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iwasaki A., Sugito M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only visual field test using Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2002;134(4):529–537. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01684-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai D., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency DoublingTechnology Perimetry for Detection of the Development of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(1):77–83. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5511</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai D., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency DoublingTechnology Perimetry for Detection of the Development of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(1):77–83. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5511</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johnson C.A. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with Frequency Doubling perimetry Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1997;3(2):413–424.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johnson C.A. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with Frequency Doubling perimetry Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1997;3(2):413–424.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeppieri M., Johnson C.A. Frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. Imaging and perimetry society. 2013. http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/ips/perimetryhistory/FDP/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeppieri M., Johnson C.A. Frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. Imaging and perimetry society. 2013. http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/ips/perimetryhistory/FDP/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balian C. Structure and Function in Early Glaucoma: A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in the fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Vision Science. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017. 170 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balian C. Structure and Function in Early Glaucoma: A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in the fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Vision Science. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017. 170 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Addepalli U.K. Validating the ability of a vision technician in detecting glaucoma in a south Indian rupal population: [dissertation PhD] University of New South Wales. Australia, Sydney, 2018. 171 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Addepalli U.K. Validating the ability of a vision technician in detecting glaucoma in a south Indian rupal population: [dissertation PhD] University of New South Wales. Australia, Sydney, 2018. 171 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симакова И.Л., Волков В.В., Бойко Э.В. Сравнение результатов разработанного метода периметрии с удвоенной пространственной частотой и оригинального метода FDT периметрии. Глаукома. 2010;1:5–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simakova I.L., Volkov V.V., Boiko E.V. The results of developed method of frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in comparison with the results of the original FDT perimetry. Glaucoma = Glaukoma. 2010;1:5–11 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сердюкова С.А., Симакова И.Л. Компьютерная периметрия в диагностике первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2018;11(1):54–65. DOI: 10.17816/OV11154-65</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Serdyukova S.А., Simakova I.L. Computer perimetry in the diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology journal = Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;11(1):54–65 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/OV11154-65</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burgansky Eliash Z., Wollstein G., Patel A., Bilonick R.A., Ishikawa H., Kagemann L., Dilworth W.D., Schuman J.S. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007;91(7):933–938.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burgansky Eliash Z., Wollstein G., Patel A., Bilonick R.A., Ishikawa H., Kagemann L., Dilworth W.D., Schuman J.S. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007;91(7):933–938.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Han S., Baek S.N., Kim U.S. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24 2 and 30 2 SITA Perimetry. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2017;32(5):647–650. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2016.1157611</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Han S., Baek S.N., Kim U.S. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24 2 and 30 2 SITA Perimetry. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2017;32(5):647–650. DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2016.1157611</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iwase A., Tomidokoro A., Araie M. Performance of Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry in a population based prevalence survey of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):27–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iwase A., Tomidokoro A., Araie M. Performance of Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry in a population based prevalence survey of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):27–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mansberger S.L., Edmunds B., Johnson C.A., Kent K.J., Cioffi G.A. Community visual field screening: prevalence of follow up and factors associated with follow up of participants with abnormal frequency doubling perimetry technology results. Ophthalmic epidemiology. 2007;14(3):134–140.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mansberger S.L., Edmunds B., Johnson C.A., Kent K.J., Cioffi G.A. Community visual field screening: prevalence of follow up and factors associated with follow up of participants with abnormal frequency doubling perimetry technology results. Ophthalmic epidemiology. 2007;14(3):134–140.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Racette L., Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Ng D., Weinreb R.N., Sample P.A. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24 2 and original N 30 frequency doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science. 2008;49(3):954–960.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Racette L., Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Ng D., Weinreb R.N., Sample P.A. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24 2 and original N 30 frequency doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science. 2008;49(3):954–960.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giuffrè I. Frequency Doubling Technology vs Standard Automated Perimetry in Ocular Hypertensive Patients. Open ophthalmology journal. 2009;24(3):6–9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giuffrè I. Frequency Doubling Technology vs Standard Automated Perimetry in Ocular Hypertensive Patients. Open ophthalmology journal. 2009;24(3):6–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choi J.A., Lee N.Y., Park C.K. Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24 2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma. Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2009;53(1):24–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choi J.A., Lee N.Y., Park C.K. Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24 2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma. Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2009;53(1):24–30.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prokosch V., Eter N. Correlation between early retinal nerve fiber layer loss and visual field loss determined by three different perimetric strategies: white on white, frequency doubling, or flicker defined form perimetry. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2014;252(10):1599–1606.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prokosch V., Eter N. Correlation between early retinal nerve fiber layer loss and visual field loss determined by three different perimetric strategies: white on white, frequency doubling, or flicker defined form perimetry. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2014;252(10):1599–1606.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meira Freitas D., Tatham A.J., Lisboa R., Kuang T.M., Zangwill L.M., Weinreb R.N., Medeiros F.A. Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):498–507. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meira Freitas D., Tatham A.J., Lisboa R., Kuang T.M., Zangwill L.M., Weinreb R.N., Medeiros F.A. Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(2):498–507. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Horn F.K., Scharch V., Mardin C.Y., Lämmer R., Kremers J. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2016;254(5):937–946.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Horn F.K., Scharch V., Mardin C.Y., Lämmer R., Kremers J. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early glaucoma. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2016;254(5):937–946.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jung K.I., Park C.K. Detection of functional change in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma using 10 2 matrix perimetry. American journal of ophthalmology. 2017;182:35–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jung K.I., Park C.K. Detection of functional change in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma using 10 2 matrix perimetry. American journal of ophthalmology. 2017;182:35–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Park H.Y.L., Lee L., Park C.K. Visual field tests for glaucoma patients with initial macular damage: comparison between frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry using 24 2 or 10 2 visual fields. Journal of glaucoma. 2018;27(7):627–634. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000977</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Park H.Y.L., Lee L., Park C.K. Visual field tests for glaucoma patients with initial macular damage: comparison between frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry using 24 2 or 10 2 visual fields. Journal of glaucoma. 2018;27(7):627–634. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000977</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morejon A., Mayo Iscar A., Martin R., Ussa F. Development of a new algorithm based on FDT Matrix perimetry and SD OCT to improve early glaucoma detection in primary care. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2019;13:33–42. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S177581</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morejon A., Mayo Iscar A., Martin R., Ussa F. Development of a new algorithm based on FDT Matrix perimetry and SD OCT to improve early glaucoma detection in primary care. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2019;13:33–42. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S177581</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Волков В.В. Глаукома открытоугольная. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2008. 347 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volkov V.V. Open angle glaucoma. Moscow: Medical News Agency; 2008. 347 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xin D., Greenstein V.C., Ritch R., Liebmann J.M., De Moraes C.G., Hood D.C. A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science. 2011;52(1):519–526.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xin D., Greenstein V.C., Ritch R., Liebmann J.M., De Moraes C.G., Hood D.C. A comparison of functional and structural measures for identifying progression of glaucoma. Investigative ophthalmology and visual science. 2011;52(1):519–526.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hu R., Wang C., Racette L. Comparison of matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0178079 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178079</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hu R., Wang C., Racette L. Comparison of matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0178079 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id = 10.1371/journal.pone.0178079</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wesselink C., Jansonius N.M. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2017;37(5):594–601. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12401</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wesselink C., Jansonius N.M. Glaucoma progression detection with frequency doubling technology (FDT) compared to standard automated perimetry (SAP) in the Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2017;37(5):594–601. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12401</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wall M., Johnson C.A., Zamba K.D. SITA Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018;102(10):1396–1401.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wall M., Johnson C.A., Zamba K.D. SITA Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018;102(10):1396–1401.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brusini P., Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., Parisi L. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30 2 test. Journal of glaucoma. 2006;15(2):77–83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brusini P., Salvetat M.L., Zeppieri M., Parisi L. Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30 2 test. Journal of glaucoma. 2006;15(2):77–83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai G., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry for Detection of the Development of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(1):77–83.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai G., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry for Detection of the Development of Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2014;132(1):77–83.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Clement C.I., Goldberg I., Healey P.R. Graham S. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual field defects in open angle glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(5)582–588.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clement C.I., Goldberg I., Healey P.R. Graham S. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual field defects in open angle glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(5)582–588.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Большой современный толковый словарь русского языка, 2012. https://slovar.cc/rus/tolk.html</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Great modern Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language, 2012 (In Russ.) https://slovar.cc/rus/tolk.html</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симакова И.Л., Волков В.В., Бойко Э.В., Клавдиев В.Е., Андреа К., Сергеев В.П. Создание метода периметрии с удвоенной пространственной частотой за рубежом и в России. Глаукома. 2009;8(2):15–21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simakova I.L., Volkov V.V., Boiko E.V., Klavdiev V.E, Andrea K., Sergeev V.P. Creation of the method of frequency doubling technology perimetry: an international and Russian experience. Glaucoma = Glaukomа. 2009;8(2):15–21 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симакова И.Л., Сухинин М.В., Тихоновская И.А., Петунов В.С. Новая нагрузочная проба для выявления и мониторинга глаукомы. Новости глаукомы. 2017;1:78–82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simakova I.L., Sukhinin M.V., Tikhonovskaya I.A., Petunov V.S. New exercise test for the detection and monitoring of glaucoma. Glaucoma news = Glaukoma news. 2017;1:78–82 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Волков В.В., Симакова И.Л., Тихоновская И.А. Оценка эффективности новой компрессионно периметрической пробы в ранней диагностике глаукомы. Офтальмология. 2020;17(2):229–237. DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-229-237.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volkov V.V., Simakova I.L., Tikhonovskaya I.A. Еvaluation of the new compression perimeter test effectiveness in the early diagnosis of glaucoma. Оphthalmology = Oftal’mologi. 2020;17(2):229–237 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-229-237.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
