ophthalmologyОфтальмологияOphthalmology in Russia1816-50952500-0845Ophthalmology10.18008/1816-5095-2023-4-812-818ophthalmology-2255Research ArticleКЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ СЛУЧАЙCASE REPORTБилатеральная имплантация дифракционной ИОЛ с расширенной глубиной фокуса у пациента с кераторефракционной эксимерлазерной хирургией в анамнезе. Клинический случайA Case of Bilateral Implantation of Diffraction IOL with Extended Depth of Focus in a Patient with a History of Keratorefractive Excimer Laser Surgeryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-2216КасьяновА. А.KasyanovA. A.

Касьянов Александр Анатольевич доктор медицинских наук, старший научный сотрудник

ул. Россолимо, 11а, б, Москва, 119021

Kasyanov Alexander A. MD, PhD, senior research officer

Rossolimo str., 11A, B, Moscow, 119021

ФГБНУ «Научно-исследовательский институт глазных болезней им. М.М. Краснова»РоссияM.M. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases SciencesRussian Federation202328122023204812818Copyright © Касьянов А.А., 20232023Касьянов А.А.Kasyanov A.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2255

Представлен клинический случай билатеральной имплантации EDOF ИОЛ у пациента после LASIK. Обозначены стандарты оценки остроты зрения на средней дистанции. Представлен модифицированный вариант тестовой таблицы для средней дистанции. Полученный функциональный результат соответствует теоретическим представлениям о потенциальных возможностях ИОЛ с пролонгированным фокусом. При расчете ИОЛ после LASIK достаточную степень точности обеспечили формулы Haigis-L и Barrett True-K. Перспективным является использование данных общей преломляющей силы роговицы.

A clinical case of bilateral implantation of EDOF IOL in a patient after LASIK is presented. The standards for assessing visual acuity at an intermediate distance are indicated. A modified version of the test table for the intermediate distance is presented. The obtained functional result corresponds to theoretical ideas about the potential of IOL with a prolonged focus. When calculating the IOL after LASIK, a sufficient degree of accuracy was provided by the formulas Haigis-L, Barrett True-K. The use of data on the total refractive power of the cornea is promising.

катарактафакоэмульсификацияLASIKEDOF ИОЛрасчет оптической силы ИОЛcataractphacoemulsificationLASIKEDOF IOLcalculation of the IOL powerReferencesCochener B, Concerto SG. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: international multicenter concerto study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1268–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033.Cochener B, Concerto SG. Clinical outcomes of a new extended range of vision intraocular lens: international multicenter concerto study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1268–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.06.033.Kohnen T, Suryakumar R. Extended depth-of-focus technology in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:298–304. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000109.Kohnen T, Suryakumar R. Extended depth-of-focus technology in intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:298–304. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000109.Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal, extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:434–440 doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01.Rodov L, Reitblat O, Levy A, Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction for trifocal, extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:434–440 doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190618-01.Lubiński W, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Kirkiewicz M. Comparisonof visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:2553–2562 doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z.Lubiński W, Podborączyńska-Jodko K, Kirkiewicz M. Comparisonof visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses. Int Ophthalmol 2020;40:2553–2562 doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01435-z.Tran DB, Owyang A, Hwang J, Visual acuity, quality of vision, and patient-reported outcomes after bilateral implantation with a trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:403–412. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S295503.Tran DB, Owyang A, Hwang J, Visual acuity, quality of vision, and patient-reported outcomes after bilateral implantation with a trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:403–412. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S295503.Sudhir RR, Dey A, Bhattacharrya S, . AcrySof IQ panoptix intraocular lens versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens and trifocal intraocular lens: a clinical overview. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8:335–349. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253.Sudhir RR, Dey A, Bhattacharrya S, . AcrySof IQ panoptix intraocular lens versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens and trifocal intraocular lens: a clinical overview. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8:335–349. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253.Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e164–e185. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026.Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology. 2021 Nov;128(11):e164–e185. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.09.026.Kanclerz P, Toto F, Grzybowski A, Extended depth-of-field intraocular lenses: an update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020;9:194–202. doi: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000296.Kanclerz P, Toto F, Grzybowski A, Extended depth-of-field intraocular lenses: an update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020;9:194–202. doi: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000296.Megiddo-Barnir E, Alió JL. Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2023 Jan-Feb 01;12(1):58–79. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000590.Megiddo-Barnir E, Alió JL. Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2023 Jan-Feb 01;12(1):58–79. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000590.Savini G, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2018 Jul 8;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5.Savini G, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2018 Jul 8;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-018-0110-5.Касьянов А.А., Рыжкова Е.Г. Расчет оптической силы ИОЛ после радиальной кератотомии. Офтальмология. 2022;19(2):325–333. doi: 10.18008/18165095-2022-2-325-333.Kasyanov AA, Ryzhkova EG. IOL Power Calculation Features after Radial Keratotomy Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022;19(2):325–333(In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/18165095-2022-2-325-333.Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology. 2006 Aug;113(8):1271–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.024.Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology. 2006 Aug;113(8):1271–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.024.Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Carbonelli M, Barboni P. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic excimer laser surgery: clinical comparison of published methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1455–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.029.Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Carbonelli M, Barboni P. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic excimer laser surgery: clinical comparison of published methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1455–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.02.029.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Ducoli P, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic excimer laser surgery: Selecting the best method using available clinical data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1880–1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.026.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Ducoli P, Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic excimer laser surgery: Selecting the best method using available clinical data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1880–1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.026.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:598–604. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.11.022.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and a corneal topography system for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.036.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and a corneal topography system for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.036.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:787–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.037.Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with Placido-disk corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:787–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.037.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.