<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ophthalmology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Офтальмология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ophthalmology in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1816-5095</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2500-0845</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Ophthalmology</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18008/1816-5095-2025-4-853-865</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ophthalmology-2814</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнение биометрических показателей при стандартной и сегментной оптической биометрии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparison of Biometric Parameters in Standard and Segmental Optical Biometry</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-8899</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Першин</surname><given-names>К. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pershin</surname><given-names>К. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Першин Кирилл Борисович - доктор медицинских наук, профессор, медицинский директор сети клиник, профессор кафедры офтальмологии.</p><p>Ул. Марксистская, 3, стр. 1, Москва, 109147; Волоколамское шоссе, 91, Москва, 125371</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pershin Kirill B. - MD, Professor, medical director, Ophthalmology Faculty Professor.</p><p>Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147; Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-0102</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пашинова</surname><given-names>Н. Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pashinova</surname><given-names>N. F.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Пашинова Надежда Федоровна - доктор медицинских наук, профессор, главный врач, профессор кафедры офтальмологии.</p><p>Ул. Марксистская, 3, стр. 1, Москва, 109147; Волоколамское шоссе, 91, Москва, 125371</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pashinova Nadezhda F. - MD, Professor, chief physician, Ophthalmology Faculty Professor.</p><p>Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147; Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-3545</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Цыганков</surname><given-names>А. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tsygankov</surname><given-names>A. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Цыганков Александр Юрьевич - кандидат медицинских наук, врач-офтальмолог, научный референт медицинского директора сети клиник.</p><p>Ул. Марксистская, 3, стр. 1, Москва, 109147</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Tsygankov Alexander Yu. - PhD, scientific advisor, ophthalmologist.</p><p>Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2547-5913</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Панов</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Panov</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Панов Андрей Алексеевич - врач-офтальмолог, аспирант кафедры офтальмологии.</p><p>Ул. Марксистская, 3, стр. 1, Москва, 109147; Волоколамское шоссе, 91, Москва, 125371</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Panov Andrey A. - ophthalmologist, postgraduate student.</p><p>Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147; Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Офтальмологический центр «Эксимер»; Академия последипломного образования ФГБУ «Федеральный научно-клинический центр» Федерального медико-биологического агентства</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>“Eximer” Eye Center; Academy of Postgraduate Education of The Federal Medical-Biological Agency</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Офтальмологический центр «Эксимер»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>“Eximer” Eye Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>853</fpage><lpage>865</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю., Панов А.А., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Першин К.Б., Пашинова Н.Ф., Цыганков А.Ю., Панов А.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pershin К.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Y., Panov A.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2814">https://www.ophthalmojournal.com/opht/article/view/2814</self-uri><abstract><p>Оптическая биометрия широко применяется в офтальмологии для различных целей. В механизме работы недавно вышедшего на отечественный рынок прибора Argos (Alcon, США) используются отдельные рефракционные индексы для разных структур глазного яблока, что принципиально отличает его от других моделей. Вопрос сопоставимости его показателей с другими биометрами на популяции российских пациентов исследован недостаточно.</p><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель: сравнительный анализ показателей кератометрии в плоском (К1) и крутом (К2) меридианах, средней кератометрии (Кm), аксиальной длины (AL), глубины передней камеры (ACD), толщины хрусталика (LT), расстояния «от белого до белого» (WTW), а также частоты релевантного измерения AL — между оптическими биометрами Argos и IOLMaster 700. Пациенты и методы. В исследование включен 251 пациент (368 глаз) независимо от наличия катаракты: 244 женщины (66,3 %) и 124 мужчины (33,7 %). Средний возраст составил 68,18 ± 13,36 года (24–92 года). Критерии невключения: нестабильная зрительная фиксация, псевдофакия, афакия, витрэктомия в анамнезе, разница между датами проведения биометрии на Argos и IOLMaster 700 более 1 месяца. Клиническую значимость различий оценивали с помощью графиков Бланда — Альтмана и расчета 95 % границ согласованности (95 % LoA).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Частота релевантных измерений AL на биометре Argos составила 100 %, на IOLMaster 700 — 99,2 % (p = 0,25). Показатели К1, К2, Km, ACD, LT и WTW были значимо выше на Argos по сравнению с IOLMaster 700. AL значимо не различалась только в диапазоне 22,0–23,0 мм. При AL &lt; 22,0 мм данный показатель был значимо больше на Argos, при AL &gt; 23,0 мм — на IOLMaster 700. При увеличении отклонения AL от диапазона 22,0–23,0 мм разница AL между двумя биометрами была выше. Выявлена обратная зависимость различий в ACD от ее величины. Отмечена сильная корреляция всех исследуемых параметров на двух биометрах, при этом 95 % LoA оказались широкими.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Различия в кератометрии, AL, ACD, LT и WTW на Argos и IOLMaster 700 клинически значимы, поэтому данные биометры нельзя считать взаимозаменяемыми во всех клинических ситуациях.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Optical biometry is widely used in ophthalmology for different purposes. The Argos (Alcon, USA) device, which recently entered the Russian market, uses different refractive indices for different eye structures. This feature fundamentally distinguishes it from other models. The issue of its comparability with other biometers in the Russian population has not been researched sufficiently.</p><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose. To compare keratometry in the flat (K1) and steep (K2) meridians, mean keratometry (Km), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white (WTW) and the frequency of relevant AL measurement between the Argos and IOLMaster 700 devices.</p></sec><sec><title>Patients and methods</title><p>Patients and methods. Two hundred fifty-one patients (368 eyes) were included in the study regardless of the presence of cataract: 244 females (66.3 %) and 124 males (33.7 %). The mean age was 68.18 ± 13.36 years (24–92 years). The exclusion criteria were: unstable visual fixation, pseudophakia, aphakia, history of vitrectomy, the difference between the dates of biometry on the Argos and IOLMaster 700 more than 1 month. Clinical significance of the differences was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and 95 % limits of agreement (95 % LoA). Results. The frequency of relevant AL measurements was 100 % on the Argos, and 99.2 % on the IOLMaster 700 (p = 0.25). The K1, K2, Km, ACD, LT and WTW measurements were significantly higher on the Argos compared to the IOLMaster 700. AL did not differ significantly only in the range of 22.0–23.0 mm. At AL &lt; 22.0 mm this parameter was significantly higher on the Argos, at AL &gt; 23.0 mm — on the IOLMaster 700. The more was the AL deviation from the range of 22.0–23.0 mm, the greater was the difference in AL between the two biometers. The difference in ACD was inversely proportional to the magnitude of ACD. Strong correlations were found for all studied parameters on the two biometers, however, 95 % LoA were wide.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Conclusion. The differences in keratometry, AL, ACD, LT and WTW between the Argos and IOLMaster 700 are clinically significant and therefore this biometers cannot be considered interchangeable in all clinical situations.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>биометрия</kwd><kwd>оптическая биометрия</kwd><kwd>сегментная оптическая биометрия</kwd><kwd>Argos</kwd><kwd>IOLMaster 700</kwd><kwd>расчет ИОЛ</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>biometry</kwd><kwd>optical biometry</kwd><kwd>segmental optical biometry</kwd><kwd>Argos</kwd><kwd>IOLMaster 700</kwd><kwd>IOL calculation</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">никто из авторов не имеет финансовой заинтересованности в представленных материалах или методах</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">no author has a financial or property interest in any material or method mentioned</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu J, Wen D, Zhao J, Wang Y, Feng K, Wan T, Savini G, McAlinden C, Lin X, Niu L, Chen S, Gao Q, Ning R, Jin Y, Zhou X, Huang J. Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis. Eye and Vis. 2023;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00320-3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu J, Wen D, Zhao J, Wang Y, Feng K, Wan T, Savini G, McAlinden C, Lin X, Niu L, Chen S, Gao Q, Ning R, Jin Y, Zhou X, Huang J. Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis. Eye and Vis. 2023;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00320-3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Micheletti JM, Hall B. Assessment of measurement variability across automated biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025;51(2):156–160. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001583.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Micheletti JM, Hall B. Assessment of measurement variability across automated biometry devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025;51(2):156–160. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001583.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bergmanson JP, Martinez JG. Size does matter: what is the corneo‐limbal diameter? Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2017;100(5):522–528. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12583.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bergmanson JP, Martinez JG. Size does matter: what is the corneo‐limbal diameter? Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2017;100(5):522–528. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12583.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kato Y, Ayaki M, Tanaka Y, Tamaoki A, Sakai Y, Ichikawa K, Ichikawa K. Comparison of accuracy and axial length acquisition success rate by three types of sweptsource OCT-based biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;51(4):287–293. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001601</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kato Y, Ayaki M, Tanaka Y, Tamaoki A, Sakai Y, Ichikawa K, Ichikawa K. Comparison of accuracy and axial length acquisition success rate by three types of sweptsource OCT-based biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;51(4):287–293. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001601</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto M, Kaga T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa K. Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Dense Cataract. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(4):595–603. doi: 10.1159/000515054.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto M, Kaga T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa K. Evaluation of Axial Length Measurement Using Enhanced Retina Visualization Mode of the Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Dense Cataract. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(4):595–603. doi: 10.1159/000515054.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sabatino F, Matarazzo F, Findl O, Maurino V. Comparative analysis of 2 sweptsource optical coherence tomography biometers. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2019;45(8):1124–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sabatino F, Matarazzo F, Findl O, Maurino V. Comparative analysis of 2 sweptsource optical coherence tomography biometers. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2019;45(8):1124–1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.020.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jin A, Han X, Zhang J, Qiu X, Zhang Y, Qu B, Tan X, Luo L. Agreement of Total Keratometry and Posterior Keratometry Among IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2023;12(3):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jin A, Han X, Zhang J, Qiu X, Zhang Y, Qu B, Tan X, Luo L. Agreement of Total Keratometry and Posterior Keratometry Among IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2023;12(3):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.3.13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montés-Micó R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tañá-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(6):802–814. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montés-Micó R, Pastor-Pascual F, Ruiz-Mesa R, Tañá-Rivero P. Ocular biometry with swept-source optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47(6):802–814. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000551.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tañá-Rivero P, Aguilar-Córcoles S, Tañá-Sanz P, Tañá-Sanz S, Montés-Micó R. Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts. Eye and Vis. 2023;10(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tañá-Rivero P, Aguilar-Córcoles S, Tañá-Sanz P, Tañá-Sanz S, Montés-Micó R. Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of four optical biometers and one ultrasound biometer in eyes with dense cataracts. Eye and Vis. 2023;10(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00352-3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">https://docs.nevacert.ru/files/med_reestr_v2/9319_instruction.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://docs.nevacert.ru/files/med_reestr_v2/9319_instruction.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Author Correction: Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69871-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, Ayaki M, Tsubota K, Negishi K. Author Correction: Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69871-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Porwolik M, Porwolik A, Mrukwa-Kominek E. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients—A Comparison between Argos® and IOLMaster 700®: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers. Medicina. 2024;60(7):1057. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071057.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Porwolik M, Porwolik A, Mrukwa-Kominek E. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients—A Comparison between Argos® and IOLMaster 700®: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers. Medicina. 2024;60(7):1057. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071057.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">https://docs.nevacert.ru/files/med_reestr_v2/70602_instruction.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://docs.nevacert.ru/files/med_reestr_v2/70602_instruction.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Морина НА, Майорова АМ, Агафонов СГ. Сравнительная оценка измерений оптических биометров IOLMaster 700 и LENSTAR LS 900. Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2019;4:181–184. doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-4181-184.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morina NA, Maiorova AM, Agafonov SG. Comprasion of ocular biometry measurements by IOLMaster 700 and LENSTAR LS 900. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019;4:181–184 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-4-181-184.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, Chung TY. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Multack S, Plummer N, Marneris A, Hall B. A Retrospective Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Three Biometers in Short, Medium, and Long Eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:577–583. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487889.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Multack S, Plummer N, Marneris A, Hall B. A Retrospective Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Three Biometers in Short, Medium, and Long Eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2025;19:577–583. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487889.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huang J, Chen H, Li Y, Chen Z, Gao R, Yu J, Zhao Y, Lu W, McAlinden C, Wang Q. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(2):115–120. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huang J, Chen H, Li Y, Chen Z, Gao R, Yu J, Zhao Y, Lu W, McAlinden C, Wang Q. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three SweptSource OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(2):115–120. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Multack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, Datar M, Hsiao CW, Babu R, Pan SM, Woodard L. Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1–13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384545.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Multack S, Pan LC, Timmons SK, Datar M, Hsiao CW, Babu R, Pan SM, Woodard L. Impact of a Swept Source-Optical Coherence Tomography Device on Efficiency in Cataract Evaluation and Surgery: A Time-and-Motion Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1–13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384545.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto M, Kaga T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa K. Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(1):11–23. doi: 10.1159/000496690.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, Yamamoto M, Kaga T, Tanaka K, Ichikawa K. Clinical Evaluation of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Biometer That Uses Individual Refractive Indices to Measure Axial Length in Cataract Patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(1):11–23. doi: 10.1159/000496690.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Melendez RF, Smits G, Nguyen T, Ruffaner-Hanson CD, Ortiz D, Hall B. Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:3795–3802. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S378019.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Melendez RF, Smits G, Nguyen T, Ruffaner-Hanson CD, Ortiz D, Hall B. Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:3795–3802. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S378019.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Montés-Micó R. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(1):16–25. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Montés-Micó R. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(1):16–25. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000690.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Першин КБ, Пашинова НФ, Цыганков АЮ, Панов АА. Первый опыт применения сегментной оптической биометрии для расчета оптической силы ИОЛ в Российской Федерации. Офтальмология. 2025;22(3):582–588. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-582-588.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Panov AA. First experience of using segmental optical biometry for IOL power calculation in the Russian Federation. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):582–588 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/18165095-2025-3-582-588.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Carballo L, Taroni L, Schiano-Lomoriello D. Comparison of different methods to calculate the axial length measured by optical biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(6):685–689. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000821.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Carballo L, Taroni L, Schiano-Lomoriello D. Comparison of different methods to calculate the axial length measured by optical biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(6):685–689. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000821.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang J, Yin LR. The Application of Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Macular Diseases. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;2020:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2020/9503795.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang J, Yin LR. The Application of Enhanced Depth Imaging Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Macular Diseases. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;2020:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2020/9503795.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Multack S, Plummer N, Smits G, Hall B. Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2423–2428. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S407538.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Multack S, Plummer N, Smits G, Hall B. Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2423–2428. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S407538.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Utine CA, Ayhan Z, Durmaz Engin C. Effect of intracorneal ring segment implantation on corneal asphericity. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(8):1303–1307. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.09.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Utine CA, Ayhan Z, Durmaz Engin C. Effect of intracorneal ring segment implantation on corneal asphericity. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(8):1303–1307. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.09.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shi Q, Wang GY, Cheng YH, Pei C. Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(7):1013–1017. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.08.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shi Q, Wang GY, Cheng YH, Pei C. Comparison of IOL-Master 700 and IOL-Master 500 biometers in ocular biological parameters of adolescents. Int J Ophthalmol. 2021;14(7):1013–1017. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.07.08.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A, Yu Y, Wang Q. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015;41(10):2233–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.062.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A, Yu Y, Wang Q. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015;41(10):2233–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.062.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Першин КБ, Пашинова НФ, Цыганков АЮ, Легких СЛ, Афаунова ЗХ. Лазерная парциальная когерентная биометрия и иммерсионное ультразвуковое исследование при расчете оптической силы ИОЛ у пациентов с миопией. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2017;17(1):10–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Legkikh SL, Afaunova ZKh. Partial coherence laser interferometry and immersion ultrasonography for IOL power calculations in myopia. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2017;17(1):10–16 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
