Inverted Posterior Femto-Keratoplasty: Quality of the Surface of the Corneal Section and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-216-222
Abstract
Purpose. To evaluate the quality of the surface of an ultra-thin donor transplant prepared from the endothelial surface of the cornea using a femtosecond laser and to demonstrate the preliminary clinical results.
Patients and Methods. 4 eyes were operated: 3 with Fuch`s endothelial dystrophy and 1 with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. All patients were treated with DSEK with an ultrathin graft prepared by Alcon Wavelight FS 200 femtosecond laser (Germany). Before and after surgery UCVA, BSCVA, astigmatism, ECD were measured. EC death, graft thickness and CCT were evaluated at 12 months` observation. Atomic force microscopy was used for examination of 10 samples. Control group was 5 corneal flaps obtained by mechanical microkeratome (Moria SLK-2, France). Main group — 5 corneal flaps, obtained by femtosecond laser. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. Coefficient of reliability p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Results. RMS value of femto-laser group samples was 18.6 ± 7.8 um. RMS of microkeratome group samples was 22.3 ± 18.3 um. Statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between the values of the studied parameter in these groups (p > 0.05). Transparent engraftment was observed in all cases, no corneal edema was identified. BSCVA ranged from 0.2 to 0.6, which was associated with the presence of concomitant pathology. Astigmatism was 1.35 ± 1.0 D. ECD = 1526 ± 434 cells/mm2. EC loss = 48.0 ± 12.8 %. Graft thickness in the central zone was 78.0 ± 18.1 µm. Center-Edge Index — 0.84 ± 0.12. CCT = 600 ± 31 um. No postoperative complications were found.
Conclusion. The developed settings allowed to obtain high-quality ultra-thin graft with a sufficiently uniform surface without a risk of perforation. Preliminary clinical results showed the method potential for restoration of corneal transparency. ECD loss corresponded to the one achievable by DSAEK.
About the Authors
A. N. PashtaevRussian Federation
Pashtaev Aleksei N.
PhD, researcher
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
B. E. Malyugin
Russian Federation
Malyugin Boris E.
MD, PhD, Professor, deputy director general for science
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
S. B. Izmailova
Russian Federation
Izmailova Svetlana B.
PhD, MD, head of transplant surgery department
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
N. P. Pashtaev
Russian Federation
Pashtaev Nikolai P.
MD, PhD, Professor, deputy director for science
Tractorostroiteley ave., 10, Cheboksary, 42808
K. N. Kuzmichev
Russian Federation
Kuzmichev Konstantin N.
resident
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
S. S. Alieva
Russian Federation
Alieva Sabina S.
resident
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
K. I. Katmakov
Russian Federation
Katmakov Konstantin I.
ophthalmologist
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59A, Moscow, 127486
References
1. Tan D., Mehta J. Future directions in lamellar corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2007;26(1):21–28. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f685c
2. Eye Bank Association of America: Statistical report on eye banking activity for 2016. Washington, 2017. EBAA. Allrightsreserved.
3. Al-Towerki A.Е., Gonnahеl S., Al-Rajhi A., Wagoner М.D. Changing indications for corneal transplantation at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (1983–2002). Cornea. 2004;23(6):584–588. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000121708.58571.5b
4. Gorovoy M. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006; 25(8):886–899. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000214224.90743.01
5. Maeno A., Naor J., Lee H.M., Hunter W.S., Rootman D.S. Three decades of corneal trasplantatain: indications and patient characteristics. Cornea. 2000;19(1):7–11. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200001000-00002
6. Sugar A., Sugar J. Techniques in penetrating keratoplasty: a quarter century of development. Cornea. 2000;19(5):603–610. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200009000-00005
7. Neff K., Biber J., Holland E. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(4):388–391. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f236c6
8. Sikder S., Nordgren R.N., Neravetla S.R., Moshirfar M. Ultra-thin donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty with a double-pass microkeratome. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011;152(2):202–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.051
9. Busin M., Patel A.K., Scorcia V., Ponzin D. Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(1):521–524. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7753
10. Малюгин Б.Э., Мороз З.И., Борзенок С.А., Дроздов И.В., Айба Э.Э., Паштаев А.Н. Первый опыт и клинические результаты задней автоматизированной послойной кератопластики (ЗАПК) с использованием предварительно выкроенных консервированных ультратонких роговичных трансплантатов. Офтальмохирургия. 2013;(3):12–16. [Malyugin B.E., Moroz Z.I., Borzenok S.A., Drozdov I.V., Aiba E.E., Pashtaev A.N. First experience and clinical results of DSAEK utilizing the pre-cut ultrathin grafts. The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery = Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2013;(3):12–16 (In Russ.)].
11. Малюгин Б.Э., Измайлова С.Б., Малютина Е.А., Антонова О.П., Гелястанов А.М. Клинико-функциональные результаты хирургического лечения катаракты и первичной эндотелиальной дистрофии роговицы Фукса методом одномоментной факоэмульсификации и центрального десцеметорексиса. Вестник офтальмологии. 2017;(6):16–22. [Malyugin B.E., Izmaylova S.B., Malyutina E.A., Antonova O.P., Gelyastanov A.M. Clinical and functional results of onestep phaco surgery and central descemetorhexis for cataract and Fuchs primary endothelial corneal dystrophy. Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2017;(6):16–22 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2017133616-22
12. Phillips P.M., Phillips L.J., Saad H.A., Terry M.A., Stolz D.B., Stoeger C., Franks J., Davis-Boozer D. ‘‘Ultrathin’’ DSAEK tissue prepared with a low-pulse energy, high-frequency femtosecond laser. Cornea. 2013;32:81–86. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825c72dc
13. Hjortdal J., Nielsen E., Vestergaard A., Søndergaard A. Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser. Open.Ophthalmol. J. 2012;6:19–22. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101206010019
14. Liu Y.C., Teo E.P., Adnan K.B., Yam G.H., Peh G.S., Tan D.T., Mehta J.S. Endothelial approach ultrathin corneal grafts prepared by femtosecond laser for Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55(12):8393–401. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15080
15. Ivarsen A., Hjortdal J. Clinical outcome of Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty with femtosecond laser-prepared grafts. Acta. Ophthalmol. 2018;96(5):e655–e656. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13672
16. Малюгин Б.Э., Шилова Н.Ф., Антонова О.П., Анисимова Н.С., Шормаз И.Н. Сравнительный анализ клинико-функциональных результатов задней послойной кератопластики с использованием фемтосекундного лазера и микрокератома. Офтальмохирургия. 2019;(1):20–26. [Malyugin B.E., Shilova N.F., Antonova O.P., Anisimova N.S., Shormaz I.N. Comparative analysis of the results of clinical and functional results using a fettosecond laser and microkeratome. The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery = Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2019;(1):20–26 (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2019-1-20-26
17. Zhang T., Li S.W., Chen T.H., He J.L., Kang Y.W., Lyu F.Q., Ning J.H., Liu C. Clinical results of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2017;10(2):223–227. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.02.07
Review
For citations:
Pashtaev A.N., Malyugin B.E., Izmailova S.B., Pashtaev N.P., Kuzmichev K.N., Alieva S.S., Katmakov K.I. Inverted Posterior Femto-Keratoplasty: Quality of the Surface of the Corneal Section and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(2):216-222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-216-222