Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Comparion of two techniques crosslinking for progressive keratectasia

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2012-2-18-21

Abstract

Purpose: to compare surgical approaches, features of the postoperative period and functional results of conventional and opti- mized crosslinking techniques.
Methods: We followed 2 groups of patients (10 patients, 10 eyes each), treated in Volgograd branch of the S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Clinic for kerotoconus of the II-III degree according to the conventional method (I group) and the optimized technique (II group). the optimized technique consisted of the customized excimer laser corneal deepitalization to the depth of 2/3 of the epithelial layer. Excimer laser ablation with intraoperative «on-line» pachymetry was made by means of Schwind Amaris-500 Hz (Schwind, Germany).
Results: Method of the optimized crosslinking with a customized depth of excimer laser ablation required a longer period for satu- ration of the cornea with solution of riboflavin (mean 5-10 minutes). However, it was accompanied with a less severe corneal syndrome, a complete reepithelization and an earlier postoperative recovery of visual functions. Six months postoperatively a 1-2-line improve- ment of BCVA and UCVA was achieved in 19 patients (19 eyes). Decrease of cylindrical component averaged 1.2 D in the group I and 1 D in the group II. Mean refraction change in SE was 2.2 D in the group I and 2.0 D in the group II. Six months postoperatively one patient from the group II had a 1-line regression of BCVA in comparison to the preoperative level accompanied with a 10 μm corneal thinning and corneal curvature steepening by 2 D at the top of keratoconus, which was regarded as an aggravation of initial state.
Conclusion: Both approaches have proved their safety and effectiveness. However, incurrence of the above-mentioned case of state deterioration calls for the further comparative studies in order to evaluate clinical effectiveness of these methods.

About the Authors

L. N. Boriskina
Волгоградский филиал ФГУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова Росмедтехнологии», Волгоград, Россия
Russian Federation


I. A. Remesnikov
Волгоградский филиал ФГУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова Росмедтехнологии», Волгоград, Россия
Russian Federation


E. S. Blinkova
Волгоградский филиал ФГУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова Росмедтехнологии», Волгоград, Россия
Russian Federation


E. G. Solodkova
Волгоградский филиал ФГУ «МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» им. акад. С.Н. Федорова Росмедтехнологии», Волгоград, Россия
Russian Federation


References

1. Севостьянов Е. Н., Горскова Е. Н. Кератоконус плюс. Челябинск, 2006. — 147 с.

2. Roe R. H., Lass J. H., Brown G. C., Brown M. M. The value‐based medicine comparative effectiveness and cost‐ effectiveness of penetrating keratoplasty for kera- toconus // Cornea. — 2008. — Vol. 27, No 9. — P. 1001‐1007.

3. Bahar I., Kaiserman I., Srinivasan S., et al. Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus // Int. Ophthalmol. — 2008. — Vol. 28, No 3. — P. 141‐146.

4. Price F. W., Price M. O., Adult keratoplasty: has the prognosis improved in the last 25 years? // Int. Ophthalmol. — 2008. ‐Vol. 28, No 3. — P. 141‐146.

5. Colin J., Cochner B., Savary G. et al. Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings // J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. — 2000. ‐Vol. 26. — P. 1117‐1122.

6. Ferrara de A., Cunha P. Tecnica cirurgica para correcao de myopia; Аnel corne- ano intra‐estromal // Rev. Bras. Oftalmol. — 1995. — Vol. 54. — P. 577‐588.

7. Spoerl E., Schreiber J., Hellmund K., et al. Crosslinking effects in the cornea of rabbits // Ophthalmology. — 2000. — Vol. 97. — P. 203‐206.

8. Spoerl E., Wollensak G., Seiler T. Increased resistance of crosslinking cornea against enzymatic digestion // Current Eye Res. — 2004. — Vol. 29, No 1. — P. 35‐40.

9. Spoerl E., Wollensak G., Dittert D., et al. Thermomechanical behavior of collagen‐crosslinked porcine cornea // Ophthalmologica — 2004. — Vol. 218. — P. 136‐140.

10. Wollensak G., Spoerl E., Seiler T. Riboflavin / ultraviolet‐a induced collagen‐ crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus // Am. J. Ophthalmol. — 2003. — Vol. 135. — P. 620‐627.

11. Wollensak G., Wilsch M., Spoerl E., et al. Collagen fiber diameter in the rabbit cornea after collagen‐crosslinking by riboflavin / UVA // J. Cornea. — 2004. — Vol. 23, No 5. — P. 503‐507.


Review

For citations:


Boriskina L.N., Remesnikov I.A., Blinkova E.S., Solodkova E.G. Comparion of two techniques crosslinking for progressive keratectasia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2012;9(2):18-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2012-2-18-21

Views: 855


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)