New Opportunities in Non-Preservative Glaucoma Therapy
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-260-265
Abstract
Most of the medicines used for the treatment of glaucoma include a preservative in various concentrations. With long-term topical therapy, patients with glaucoma may develop dry eye syndrome (DES). The severity of symptoms depends on the number of drugs used and the presence of a preservative in them. Against the background of DES progression, compliance to glaucoma therapy may decrease, and, consequently, the effectiveness of the treatment may decrease. Currently, new non-preservative hypotensive drugs containing brimonidine, as well as a fixed combination (FC) of dorzolamide and timolol, are available on the market.
Purpose: to compare assessment of the hypotensive effect and tolerability of preservative-free drugs FC Dorzolamid 20 mg/ml, Timolol 5 mg/ml (Dortmol Antiglau ECO) and Brimonidine 2 mg/ml (Brim Antiglau ECO) when switching from similar drugs containing a preservative in patients with compensated glaucoma.
Patients and methods. In this prospective clinical study, 60 patients (60 eyes) with compensated primary open-angle glaucoma on combined topical therapy were examined. In group 1 (30 patients, 30 eyes), the combinations of dorzolamide / timolol or brinzolamide / timolol were switched with the non-preservative Dortmol Antiglau ECO. In group 2 (30 patients, 30 eyes), the brimonidine as part of the medication regimen were replaced with the non-preservative Brim Antiglau ECO. The level of corneal-compensated IOP was assessed before the switch in therapy and after 1 month. Subjective feelings and objective signs of the treatment’s use were monitored during examination and using a questionnaire, which was compiled to study the tolerance of therapy.
Results. Switching to a preservative-free combination of dorzolamide and timolol resulted in a reduction in complaints of irritation, lacrimation, and foreign body sensation. The efficiency control did not reveal a significant change (p > 0.05) in the cornealcompensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). When transferred to the Brim Antiglau ECO as part of the local hypotensive treatment, intraocular pressure decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The average total score characterizing drug intolerance, when evaluated by the patient, decreased by 2.4 times, by the attending physician-by 1.9 times. The degree of conjunctival hyperemia on the MacMonnies photographic scale decreased in both groups.
Conclusion. Preservative-free drugs can be recommended for most patients with glaucoma as a starting treatment and as a replacement for current therapy.
About the Authors
A. A. AntonovRussian Federation
PhD, leading researcher,
Rossolimo str., 11A,B, Moscow, 119021
I. V. Kozlova
Russian Federation
PhD, leading researcher,
Rossolimo str., 11A,B, Moscow, 119021
A. A. Vitkov
Russian Federation
junior researcher,
Rossolimo str., 11A,B, Moscow, 119021
References
1. Erichev V.P., Ambartsumyan K.H., Fedorov A.A. Clinical and morphological evidence of the effect of preservatives on the eye surface in primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2014;13(4):13–22 (In Russ.).
2. Erichev V.P., Volzhanin A.V. Nonpreservative glaucoma treatment. National Journal glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2020;19(1):69–78 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25700/NJG.2020.01.10
3. Karlova E.V., Petrov S.Y., Germanova V.N. Preservative-free fixed combination in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: the VISIONARY Study (EUPAS22204). Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020;136(4):76–84 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013604176
4. Dorofeev D.A., Kryzhanovskaya A.V., Ciganov A.Z. Effectiveness of antihypertensive conservative-free therapy with fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol (intermediate results). Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020;136(2):73–80 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202013602173
5. Hollo G., Katsanos A., Boboridis K.G., Irkec M., Konstas A.G.P. PreservativeFree Prostaglandin Analogs and Prostaglandin/Timolol Fixed Combinations in the Treatment of Glaucoma: Efficacy, Safety and Potential Advantages. Drugs. 2018;78(1):39–64. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-017-0843-9
6. Konstas A.G., Hollo G. Preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed combination: a new opportunity in the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2016;17(9):1271–1283. DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2016.1182983
7. Konstas A.G., Quaranta L., Realini T. Overview of the [corrected] travoprost /timolol BAK-free fixed combination. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(5):757–766. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2012.662485
8. Swymer C., Neville M.W. Tafluprost: the first preservative-free prostaglandin to treat open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(11):1506–1510. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1R229
9. Cucherat M., Stalmans I., Rouland J.F. Relative efficacy and safety of preservativefree latanoprost (T2345) for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: an adjusted Indirect comparison meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(1):e69–75. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182a075e6
10. Uusitalo H., Egorov E., Kaarniranta K., Astakhov Y., Ropo A. Benefits of switching from latanoprost to preservative-free tafluprost eye drops: a meta-analysis of two Phase IIIb clinical trials. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:445–454. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S91402
Review
For citations:
Antonov A.A., Kozlova I.V., Vitkov A.A. New Opportunities in Non-Preservative Glaucoma Therapy. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(2):260-265. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-260-265