First Experience of Multifocal and Toric Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses Implantation (Short-Term Analysis)
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-3-408-414
Abstract
Aim. Analysis of the functional results of new IOL with an extended depth of focus implantation a in the short-term (6 months) follow-up period.
Patients and methods. The prospective study included 27 patients (40 eyes) after bilateral (n = 12) or monolateral (n = 15) implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony with an average follow-up period of 6.5 ± 0.2 (6–7) months. In all cases, IOL implantation was preceded by cataract phacoemulsification or removal of the transparent lens for refractive purposes. The age range was from 39 to 78 (60.6 ± 10.1) years. EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 was implanted in 30 eyes, and toric EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony ZXT100, ZXT150, ZTX225, and ZXT300 were implanted in 10 eyes in the presence of clinically significant astigmatism.
Results. An increase in UCNVA from 0.18 ± 0.04 to 0.79 ± 0.11, UCIVA from 0.21 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.10, UCDVA from 0.24 ± 0.06 to 0.95 ± 0.16, BCNVA from 0.61 ± 0.05 to 0.80 ± 0.03, BCIVA from 0.58 ± 0.10 to 0.97 ± 0.19, and BCDVA from 0.65 ± 0.08 to 1.0 ± 0.06 (p < 0.05 in all cases). The spherical equivalent of refraction decreased from –4.5 ± 1.8 in the preoperative period to –0.18 ± 0.92 in the follow-up period of 6 months after implantation of the Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 IOL. In the group with toric IOLs, a decrease in the cylindrical component of refraction was shown from 1.33 ± 1.02 (modulo) to 0.61 ± 0.44 (modulo) during the maximum observation period. In all cases, the rotational stability of the implanted IOLs was noted. In 9 patients out of 24 (37.5 %), permanent or periodic optical phenomena were detected, of which 4 patients (16.7 %) had halos, 3 (12.5 %) had glare, and 2 (8.3 %) had difficulty driving in the dark. These side effects did not affect the overall patient satisfaction — 22 patients (91.7 %) rated the result of the operation as “excellent”, and 2 patients (8.3 %) — as “good”.
Conclusion. The paper presents an analysis of the first experience in the Russian Federation of implantation of new IOLs with extended depth of focus and their toric version in 27 patients. Data on the effectiveness of this IOL for vision correction at all distances, low frequency of side optical phenomena, and high patient satisfaction are presented. Further comparative studies with other multifocal IOLs are needed.
About the Authors
К. B. PershinRussian Federation
Pershin Kirill B., MD, PhD, Professor, medical director, ophthalmology faculty professor
Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147;
Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371
N. F. Pashinova
Russian Federation
Pashinova Nadezhda F., MD, PhD, Professor, medical director, ophthalmology faculty professor
Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147;
Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371
А. Yu. Tsygankov
Russian Federation
Tsygankov Alexander Yu., PhD, scientific advisor
Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147
E. A. Antonov
Russian Federation
Antonov Evgeny A., ophthalmologist
Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147
References
1. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu. Presbyopia-correcting surgical options. Cataract and refractive surgery = Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2016;16(2):4–14 (In Russ.).
2. Hutz W.W., Eckhardt H.B., Rohrig B., Grolmus R. Intermediate vision and reading speed with array, Tecnis, and ReSTOR intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:251–256. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080301-06
3. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu., Miyovitch O.P. The outcomes of the implantation of bifocal and trifocal IOLs for presbyopia. Cataract and refractive surgery = Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2016;16(2):23–29 (In Russ.).
4. Wilkins M.R., Allan B.D., Rubin G.S., Findl O., Hollick E.J., Bunce C., Xing W. Moorfields IOL Study Group. Randomized trial of multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision after bilateral cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2449–2455.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.048
5. Aurich H., Pham D.T. Individualised correction of presbyopia by the use of phacoemulsification: monovision and multifocal lenses. Klin Mon fur Augenheilkd. 2014;231:1004–1007. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383095
6. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Iu., Miyovich O.P., Likh I.A., Gurmizov E.P. Binocular implantation of new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens for presbyopia correction. Russian Medical Journal. Clinical Ophthalmology = Rossijskiy medicinskiy zhurnal. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2018;24(5):228–232 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18821/08692106-2018-24-5-228-232
7. Alio J.L., Plaza-Puche A.B., Fernandez-Buenaga R., Pikkel J., Maldonado M. Multifocal intraocular lenses: an overview. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62:611–634. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.03.005
8. Cochener B., Lafuma A., Khoshnood B., Courouve L., Berdeaux G. Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:45–56. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S14325
9. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Konovalova M.M., Tsygankov A.Yu., Konovalov M.E., Temirov N.E. Short Term Analysis of New Single-Piece Aspheric Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Ophthalmology in Russia = Oftal’mologija. 2019;16(1):19–25 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2019-1-19-25
10. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Konovalova M.M., Tsygankov A.Yu., Konovalov M.E. Clinical and functional results of bifocal and trifocal intraocular lenses implantation: a comparative analysis. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research = Saratovskiy nauchno-medicinskiy zhurnal. 2019;15(2):518–524 (In Russ.).
11. Mendicute J., Kapp A., Levy P., Krommes G., Arias-Puente A., Tomalla M., Barraquer E., Rozot P., Bouchut P. Evaluation of visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:203–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.037
12. de Silva S.R., Evans J.R., Kirthi V., Ziaei M., Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12):Cd003169. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4
13. Gatinel D., Loicq J. Clinically relevant optical properties of bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:273–280. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20160121-07
14. Lamba A., Pereira A., Varma D., Shahidi A., Smith D., Ahmed I.I.K. Retrospective analysis on the visual outcomes and photic phenomena following bilateral extended depth of focus intraocular lens implants. Can J Ophthalmol. 2020;55(2):126–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.07.024
15. Pilger D., Homburg D., Brockmann T., Torun N., Bertelmann E., von Sonnleithner C. Clinical outcome and higher order aberrations after bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(4):425–432. DOI: 10.1177/1120672118766809
16. Takahashi M., Yamashiro C., Yoshimoto T., Kobayashi Y., Higashijima F., Kobayashi M., Hatano M., Ohta M., Nagai T., Teranishi S., Suzuki K., Takabatake R., Kimura K. Influence of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses on visual field sensitivity. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0237728. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237728
17. Ganesh S., Brar S., Pawar A., Relekar K.J. Visual and Refractive Outcomes following Bilateral Implantation of Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens with Micromonovision. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018:7321794. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7321794
18. Sachdev G.S., Ramamurthy S., Sharma U., Dandapani R. Visual outcomes of patients bilaterally implanted with the extended range of vision intraocular lens: A prospective study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018;66(3):407–410. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_813_17
19. Choi S.H., Lee H.K., Yoon C.H., Kim M.K. Visual Performance after a Unilateral or Bilateral Implantation of Enlarged Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Cataract: A Prospective Clinical Trial. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:2163809. DOI: 10.1155/2019/2163809
20. Kohnen T., Böhm M., Hemkeppler E., Schönbrunn S., DeLorenzo N., Petermann K., Herzog M. Visual performance of an extended depth of focus intraocular lens for treatment selection. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(10):1556–1563. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0443-x
21. Tan J., Qin Y., Wang C., Yuan S., Ye J. Visual quality and performance following bilateral implantation of TECNIS Symfony intraocular lenses with or without micromonovision. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1071–1077. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S202380
22. Jackson M.A., Edmiston A.M., Bedi R. Optimum Refractive Target in Patients with Bilateral Implantation of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:455–462. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S237457
23. Gundersen K.G. Rotational stability and visual performance 3 months after bilateral implantation of a new toric extended range of vision intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1269–1278. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S173120
24. Sandoval H.P., Lane S., Slade S., Potvin R., Donnenfeld E.D., Solomon K.D. Extended depth-of-focus toric intraocular lens targeted for binocular emmetropia or slight myopia in the nondominant eye: Visual and refractive clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(10):1398–1403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.05.019
25. Temirov N.E., Temirov N.N. Subjective complaints following implantation of various multifocal intraocular lenses. Cataractal and refractive surgery = Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija. 2015;15(1):43–48 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Pershin К.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov А.Yu., Antonov E.A. First Experience of Multifocal and Toric Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses Implantation (Short-Term Analysis). Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(3):408-414. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-3-408-414