Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. A review
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2014-3-13-19
Abstract
Photochemical crosslinking is widely applied in ophthalmology. Its biochemical effect is due to the release of singlet oxygen that promotes anaerobic photochemical reaction. Keratoconus is one of the most common corneal ectasia affecting 1 in 250 to 250 000 persons. Currently, the rate of iatrogenic ectasia following eximer laser refractive surgery increases due to biomechanical weakening of the cornea. Morphologically and biochemically, ectasia is characterized by corneal layers thinning, contact between the stroma and epithelium resulting from Bowman’s membrane rupture, chromatin fragmentation in keratocyte nuclei, phagocytosis, abnormal staining and arrangement of collagen fibers, enzyme system disorders, and keratocyte apoptosis. In corneal ectasia, altered enzymatic processes result in the synthesis of abnormal collagen. Collagen packing is determined by the activity of various extracellular matrix enzymes which bind amines and aldehydes of collagen fiber amino acids. In the late stage, morphological changes of Descemet’s membrane (i.e., rupture and detachment) develop. Abnormal hexagonal-shaped keratocytes and their apoptosis are the signs of endothelial dystrophy. The lack of analogs in domestic ophthalmology encouraged the scientists of Ufa Eye Research Institute to develop a device for corneal collagen crosslinking. The parameters of ultraviolet (i.e., wavelength, exposure time, power) to achieve the desired effect were identified. The specifics of some photosensitizers in the course of the procedure were studied. UFalink, a device for UV irradiation of cornea, and photosensitizer Dextralink were developed and adopted. Due to the high risk of endothelial damage, this treatment is contraindicated in severe keratoconus (CCT less than 400 microns). Major effects of corneal collagen crosslinking are the following: Young’s modulus (modulus of elasticity) increase by 328.9 % (on average), temperature tolerance increase by 5°C, and collagen fiber diameter increase by 12.2 % (anterior stroma) and 4.6 % (posterior stroma). In mild bullous keratopathy, corneal crosslinking provides antimicrobial effect. In moderate and severe keratopathy, crosslinking reduces pain and corneal edema and improves visual acuity immediately after the procedure. A case of HSV keratitis exacerbation was described. Amongst the complications, infection, halos, and posterior segment damage should be mentioned. Poor refractive results can be improved by the implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments.
About the Authors
M. M. BikbovRussian Federation
V. K. Surkova
Russian Federation
References
1. Wollensak G., Spoerl E., Seiler T. Riboflavin / ultraviolet — A — induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 620‑627.
2. Spoerl E., Mrochen M., Sliney D., Trokel S., Seiler T. Safety of UVA — riboflavin cross — linking of the cornea. Cornea 2007; 26: 385‑389.
3. Wollensak G., Wilsch M., Sproel E. et al. Collagen Fiber Diameter in the Rabbit Cornea after Collagen Crosslinking by Riboflavin / UVA. Cornea 2004; 23: 5:503‑507.
4. Neroev V. V., Petuhov A. B., Gundorova R. A., Oganesjan O. G. [Sphere of clinical application of corneal collagen cross-linking]. Prakticheskaja medicina [Practical medicine], 2012; 1: 4. (in Russ.).
5. Bikbov MM, Bikbovа G. M. [Corneal ectasis.] Ektazii rogovitsy. Moscow, Ophthalmology, 2011. 162 p. (in Russ.).
6. Gorskova E. N. [Prevalence of keratoconus in the Chelyabinsk region]. Vestnik mediciny [Annals of Medicine], 1995; 9:19‑21 (in Russ.).
7. Grigorjan A. V., Toropygin S. G., Chashhina E. S. [Tiology and pathogenesis of various forms of cornea. A review of the literature]. Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija [Cataract Refract surgery], 2012; 4: 11‑15. (in Russ.).
8. Semenova A. L., Kolidencev M. N. [Keratoconus. Prevalence, incidence, etiology, pathogenesis, classification]. Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija [Cataract Refract surgery], 2004; 4 (4): 4‑7. (in Russ.).
9. Rabinovitz Y. S. Definition, etiology and diagnosis of keratoconus. Highlights of Ophthalmology, International Edition 2004; 21: 241‑260.
10. Rad A., Jabbarvand M., Saif N. Progressive keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract. Surg. 2004; 20: 5: 718‑722.
11. Sevast’janov E. N., Gorskova E. N. [Keratoconus plus]. Keratokonus plyus.Cheljabinsk, PIRS, 2006. (in Russ.).
12. Seiler T., Quurke A. W. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 1998; 24: 7: 1007‑1009.
13. Dumbrova N. E., Titarenko T. D. [Study of corneal depending on the stage of development of keratoconus according to the light and electronic microscopy]. Oftal’mologija [Ophthalmology], 1980;5: 309‑311. (in Russ.).
14. Dhaliwal J. S., Kaufman S. C. Corneal collagen crosslinking: a confocal, electron and light microscopy study of eye bank corneas. Cornea 2009; 28: 62‑68.
15. Hollingsworth J. G., Bonshek R. E., Efron N. Correlation of the keratokonis cornea in vivo by confocal microscopy and in vitro by light microscopy. Cornea 2005; 24: 4: 397‑405.
16. Efron N. Contact lens — induced changes in the anterior eye as observed in vivo with the confocal microscope. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2007; 26: 4: 398‑436.
17. Ivanovskaja E. V., Vit V. V., Golovchenko V. G. [Immunological status of patients with different stages of keratoconus and keratoglobus]. Oftal’mologicheskij zhurnal [J Ophthalmol], 2000; 5: 40‑44. (in Russ.)
18. Meek K. M., S. J. Tuft, Y. Huang et al. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus corneas. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005; 46: 6: 1948‑1956.
19. Bubnova I. A. [Theoretical substantiation of the change of curvature of the cornea after the formation of corneal flap is formed when conducting intrastromal keratectomy]. Vestnik oftal’mologii [Annals of ophthalmology.], 2005; 6: 31‑33. (in Russ.).
20. Rodin A. S., Brizhak P. E. [Prospects of application of a method corneal crosslinking corneal collagen in the treatment of keratoconus and кератоэктазий]. Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija [Cataract Refract surgery], 2008; 4: 14‑23. (in Russ).
21. Radner W., Zehemayer M., Skorpik Ch., Mallinger R. Altered Organization of Collagen in Apex of Keratoconus Corneas. Ophthalmic Res. 1998; 30: 327‑332.
22. Wollensak G., Herbst H. Significance of the lacunar hydration pattern after corneal crosslinking. Cornea 2010; 29: 8: 899‑903.
23. Avetisov S. Je. [The role of acidity tears and CU-cofactor of the enzyme activity лизилоксидазы in the pathogenesis of keratoconus]. Vestnik oftal’mologii [Annals of ophthalmology.]. 2011; 2: 3‑8 (in Russ.).
24. Brian S., Wachler B. Corneal Collagen Crosslinking with Riboflavin. Cataract and Refract. Surg. 2005; 73‑74.
25. Coskunseven E., Jankov MR, Hafezi F. Contralateral eye study of corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UVA irradiation in patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 371‑376.
26. Caporossi A., Baiocchi S. et al. Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin — ultraviolet type A rays induced cross — linking of corneal collagen: Preliminary refractive results in an Italian study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2006; 32: 5: 837‑845.
27. Spoerl E., Huhle M., Seiler T. Induction of cross — links in corneal tissue. Exp. Eye Res. 1998; 66: 97‑103.
28. Wollensak G., Iomdina E. Long — term biomechanical properties of rabbit cornea after photodynamic collagen crosslinking. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 48‑51.
29. Wollensak G., Spoerl E, Wilsch M., Seiler T. Keratocyte apoptosis after corneal collagen cross-linking using riboflavin UVA treatment. Cornea. — 2004. 23: 43‑49.
30. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M., Khalimov A. R. [The results of clinical use of corneal collagen crosslinking device «Ufalink»]. Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija [Cataract Refract surgery]. 2009; 7 (2): 14‑17. (in Russ.).
31. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M., Khalimov A. R. [A new cornea protector for crosslinking «Dextralink»]. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem po oftal’mohirurgii «VOSTOK-ZAPAD». [Collection of scientific papers of the scientific and practical conference with international participation «EAST — WEST»]. Ufa, 2011: 60‑61. (in Russ.).
32. Raiskup — Wolf F., Hoyer A., Spoerl E., Pillunat L. E. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet — A light in keratoconus: long — term results. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008; 34: 796‑801.
33. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M., Khabibullin A. F. [Corneal collagen crosslinking in keratoconus treatment]. [Annals of ophthalmology.] Vestnik oftal’mologii, 2011; 5: 21‑25. (in Russ.).
34. Hafezi F., Mrochen M., Iseli H. P., Seiler T. Collagen cross-linking with ultraviolet —A and hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in thin corneas. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2009; 35: 4: 621‑624.
35. Raiskup-Wolf F., Spoerl E. Reply: long-term results of collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and UVA in keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. surg. 2008; 34:1617.
36. Yuksel N., Bilgihan K., Hondur A. M. Herpetic keratitis after corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet — A for progressive keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 2011; 31: 513‑515.
37. Wollensak G. Crosslinking treatment of progressive keratoconus: new hope. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17: 356‑360.
38. Dhawan S., K. Rao, Natrajan S. Complications of corneal collagen cross-linking. J Ophthalmol 2011. — Article ID: 869015. Available at: http: www.ncbi.nlm.gov / pmc / articles / PMC3255294 / pdf / JOP201. – 69015.pdf.Accessed February 2, 2013.
39. Witting — Silva C., Whiting M., Lamoureux E., Lindsay RG, Sullivan LJ, Snibson GR A randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross — linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24: 720‑725.
40. Bubnova I. A., Antonov A. A., Novikov I. A., Sukhanova E. V., Petrov C. Y., Avetisov K. S. [Comparison of different IOP indices in patients with altered biomechemical properties of the cornea]. Glaukoma [Glaucome], 2011; 1:10‑14. (in Russ.).
41. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M. [Curative potential of crosslinking in bullous keratopathy treatment]. Oftal’mohirurgija [Ophthalmosurgery]. 2009; 2: 30‑33. (in Russ.).
42. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M., Khabibullin A. F. [The usage of corneal collagen crosslinking in bullous keratopathy treatment]. Oftal’mohirurgija [Ophthalmosurgery], 2011; 1: 24‑27. (in Russ.).
43. Ferrari G., Luliano L., Vigano M., Rama P. Impending corneal perforation after collagen cross-linking for herpetic keratitis. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39: 4: 638.
44. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M. [The results of «MyoRing» intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus treatment]. Oftal’mohirurgija [Ophthalmosurgery]. 2012; 4 (4): 6‑9. (in Russ.).
45. Bikbov M. M., Usubov E. L., Iskhakova A. K. [KeraRing intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation combined with one-step corneal collagen crosslinking for corneal ectasia]. Kataraktal’naja i refrakcionnaja hirurgija [Cataract Refract surgery]. 2012; 9 (4): 27‑30. (in Russ.).
46. Bikbov M. M., Bikbova G. M., Iskhakova A. K. [The results of KeraRing intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus]. Oftal’mohirurgija [Ophthalmosurgery]. 2013; 2 (7): 55‑58. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bikbov M.M., Surkova V.K. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. A review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2014;11(3):13-19. https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2014-3-13-19