Modern Strategies for Using Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Treatment of Glaucoma. Review
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2022-2-242-246
Abstract
This review analyzes the data on the effectiveness of the use effectiveness of the use of laser methods for the treatment of patients with glaucoma, namely selective laser trabeculoplasty. The authors analyzed the sources of domestic and foreign literature for 1996–2020. The review reflects the history of application of this method, as well as the rationale for choosing it, as the treatment for various forms of glaucoma. The efficiency of once or repeatedly applied procedures, depending also on the modification of SLT used, are presented according different authors. So far, SLT has been proven to be the laser treatment that improves the safety and efficacy of glaucoma treatment. It is necessary to continue research to study the possibilities of using it as an alternative to local hypotensive therapy, when choosing a treatment strategy for newly diagnosed initial glaucoma.
About the Authors
O. A. Shmeleva-Kenoufi
Medical Research and Education Center of the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD, ophthalmologist of the Ophthalmology department,
Lomonosovsky ave., 27/10, Moscow, 119234
M. A. Melnik
Medical Research and Education Center of the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist of the Ophthalmology department,
Lomonosovsky ave., 27/10, Moscow, 119234
V. R. Mamikonyan
Medical Research and Education Center of the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, Professor, head of the Ophthalmology department,
Lomonosovsky ave., 27/10, Moscow, 119234
A. I. Mukha
Medical Research and Education Center of the Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
MD, ophthalmologist of the consultative and diagnostic department,
Lomonosovsky ave., 27/10, Moscow, 119234
References
1. Latina M.A., Tumbocon J.A. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a new treatmentoption for open angle glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13(2):94–96. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200204000-00007
2. Dolzhich G.I., Osipova E.N. Comparative characteristics of selective and argon-laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2008;3:29–32 (In Russ).
3. Garg A., Gazzard G. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: past, present and future. Eye. 2018;32(5):863–876. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.273
4. Latina M.A., Sibayan S.A., Shin D.H., Noecker R.J., Marcellino G. Q-switched532-nm Nd: YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2082–2090. DOI: 10.1016/SO161-6420(98)91129-0
5. Waisbourd M., Katz L.J. Selective laser trabeculoplasty as a first-line therapy: a review. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;49(6):519–522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.10.003
6. Latina M.A., de Leon J.M. Selective laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmol. Clin. North Am. 2005;18(3):409–419. DOI: 10.1016/j.ohc.2005.05.005
7. Holló G. Argon and low energy, pulsed Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty. A prospective, comparative clinical and morphological study. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 1996;74(2):126–131. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1996.tb00055.x
8. Kagan D.B., Gorfinkel N.S., Hutnik CML. Mechanisms of selective laser trabeculoplasty: a Review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2014;42(7):675–681. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12281
9. Alvarado J.A., Alvarado R.G., Yeh R.F. A new insight into the cellular regulation of aqueous outflow: how trabecular meshwork endothelial cells drive a mechanism that regulates the permeability of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1500–1505. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081307
10. Cvenkel B., Hvala A., DrnovsekOlup B., Gale N. Acute ultrastructural changes of the trabecular meshwork after selective laser trabeculoplasty and low power argon laser trabeculoplasty. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(3):204–208. DOI: 10.1002/Ism.10203
11. Skaat A., Rosman M.S., Chien J.L. Microarchitecture of Schlemm Canal before and after selective laser trabeculoplasty in enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(4):361–366. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000624
12. De Keyser M., De Belder M., De Belder J., De Groot V. Selective laser trabeculoplasty as replacement therapy in medically controlled glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(5):577–581. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13509
13. Katsanos A., Konstas A.G., Mikropoulos D.G. A review of the clinical usefulness of selective laser trabeculoplasty in exfoliative glaucoma. Adv. Ther. 2018;35(5):619– 630. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0695-z
14. Kennedy J.B., SooHoo J.R., Kahook M.Y., Seibold L.K. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: an Update. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2016;5(1):63–69. DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000175
15. Leahy K.E., White A.J. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: current perspectives. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015;11(9):833–841. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S53490
16. Pillunat K.R., Spoerl E., Terai N., Pillunat L.E. Effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty on ocular haemodynamics in primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(4):374–377. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13360
17. Stunf Pukl S., Drnovšek-Olup B. Impact of laser pulse duration on the reduction of intraocular pressure during selective lasertrabeculoplasty. Int. Ophthalmol. 2018;38(1):83–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0426-x
18. Koucheki B., Hashemi H. Selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2012;21(1):65–70. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182027596
19. Li X., Wang W., Zhang X. Meta-analysis of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical medication in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. BMC ophthalmol. 2015;19(15):107. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0091-2
20. Mansouri K., Shaarawy N. Comparing pattern scanning laser trabeculoplasty to selective laser trabeculoplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(5):361–365. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13280
21. Zhou Y., Aref A.A. A Review of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Recent Findings and Current Perspectives. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2017;6(1):19–32. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-017-0082-x
22. Latina M.A., Sibayan S., Dong H. Q-switched 532-nm Nd: YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty). Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2082–2090. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420 (98)91129-0
23. Ho C.L., Lai J.S., AquiN M.V. Selective laser trabeculoplasty for primary angle closed with persistently elevated intraocular pressure after iridotomy. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(7):563–566. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c2d1
24. Hammer T., Schlotzer-Schrehardt U., Naumann G. Unilateral or asymmetric pseudoexfoliation syndrome? Au ultrastyctural study. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):1023–1031. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1023
25. Vyborny P., Sicakova S. Selective laser trabeculoplasty — new possibilities in glaucoma Treatment. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2009; 65(1):8–11.
26. Magaramov D.A., Kachalina G.F., Sokolovskaya T.V. Laser activation of trabeculae in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery = Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2007;1:29–32 (In Russ).
27. Chen E., Golchin S., Blomdahl S. A comparison between 90 degrees and 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2004;13(1):62–65. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200402000-00012
28. Nagar M., Ogunyomade A., O’Brart D.P. A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(11):1413–1417. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.052795
29. Shibata N., Sugiyama T., Ishida O. Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma in japanese eyes: comparison of 180 degrees with 360 degrees SLT. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(17):17–21. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181fc8020
30. Tawfique K., Khademi P., Querat L. Comparison between 90-degree and 360degree selective lasertrabeculoplasty (SLT): A 2-year follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(4):427–429. DOI: 10.1111/aos13949
31. Wong C., Tao L.W., Skalisky S.E. A retrospective review comparing the safety and efficacy of 120 versus 160 applications of selective laser trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(1):94–99. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000828
32. Ayala M. Intraocular pressure reduction after initial failure of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(2):315–320. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2522-1
33. Polat J., Grantham L., Mitchell K., Realini T. Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(10):1437–1441. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307486
34. Damgi K., Shan K., Rock W. Selective laser trabeculoplasty v argon laser trabeculoplasty: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(6):718– 722. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.83.6.718
35. Martinez de la Casa J.M., Garsia-Feijoo J., Castillo A. Selective vs argon laser trabeculoplasty: hypotensive efficacy, anterior chamber inflammation and postoperative pain. Eye. 2004;18(5):498–502. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700695
36. Szigiato A.A., Trope G.E., Jin Y., Buys Y.M. Same-Day Bilateral Glaucoma Laser Treatments in Ontario: 2000 to 2013. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(4):339–342. DOI: 10.1097/IJG0000000000000375
37. Francis B.A., Loewen N., Hong B., Dustin L., Kaplowitz K. Repeatability of selective laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;28(16):128. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0299-9
Review
For citations:
Shmeleva-Kenoufi O.A., Melnik M.A., Mamikonyan V.R., Mukha A.I. Modern Strategies for Using Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Treatment of Glaucoma. Review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022;19(2):242-246. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2022-2-242-246
Views:
678
Email this article 