Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Quality of Life Change in Patients with Keratoconus. Literature Review

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2022-4-727-733

Abstract

In recent years, ophthalmologists have paid great attention to keratoconus, as the disease is socially significant and affects the young working-age population. According to the literature and in clinical practice, it was found that patients with keratoconus have similar character traits, which are manifested to a greater or lesser extent in each patient. According to a number of authors, these patients have less adaptability, passive aggression, and paranoia. In addition, there is a tendency to disorganization of thinking, substance abuse and anxiety. The article considers clinical cases of Association of keratoconus with mental disorders and diseases such as schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette’s syndrome. Examples of the occurrence of the disease after mechanical damage to the eyeball are given. This paper also describes changes in the quality of life of patients with this pathology, identified using different questionnaire options. The use of 18 different, most frequently used questionnaires to determine the impact of keratoconus on the patient’s quality of life is considered: specialized for keratoconus, General for eye pathology, and General medical for assessing mental functions. Using a specialized questionnaire for keratoconus, changes in the quality of life were evaluated in the following categories: visual acuity assessment, problems with near or far vision, restrictions on social interaction due to low vision, restriction of physical activity, dependence on others due to eye problems, deterioration of mental health associated with changes in the visual organ, driving problems, restrictions on visual fields, color perception and eye pain. General ophthalmological questionnaires were also used, in particular, to assess dry eye syndrome, visual impairment, contact lens use and their impact on quality of life, etc. In patients with keratoconus, other questionnaires were also used, for example, to assess the indicator of the state anxiety scale, selfassessment of depression. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the questionnaires, their applicability directly to patients with keratoconus.

About the Authors

M. M. Bikbov
Ufa Eye Research Institute of Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Russian Federation

PhD, MD, Professor, director

Pushkina str., 90, Ufa, 450008, Russian Federation 



E. L. Usubov
Ufa Eye Research Institute of Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Russian Federation

PhD, head of Department of corneal and lens surgery

Pushkina str., 90, Ufa, 450008, Russian Federation 



I. I. Kandarova
Ufa Eye Research Institute of Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Russian Federation

junior researcher, Department of corneal and lens surgery

Pushkina str., 90, Ufa, 450008, Russian Federation 



References

1. Bikbov M.M., Bikbova G.M. Corneal ectasia (pathogenesis, pathomorphology, clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment). Moscow: Ophthalmology; 2011. P. 9–20 (In Russ.).

2. Rabinowitz Y.S. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7

3. Mas Tur V., MacGregor C., Jayaswal R. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(6):770–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009

4. Hashemi H., Shaygan N., Asgari S. ClearKone Synergeyes or rigid gas permeable contact lens in keratoconic patients: a clinical decision. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(2):95–98. DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000016

5. Labiris G., Giarmoukakis A., Sideroudi H. Impact of keratoconus, cross linking and cross linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on self reported quality of life. Cornea. 2012;31(7):734–739. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823cbe85

6. Sevast’yanov E.N., Gorskova E.N. Keratokonus plyus. Chelyabinsk: PIRS; 2006. P. 35–47 (In Russ.).

7. Mannis M.J., Ling J.J., Kyrillos R., Barnett M. Keratoconus and Personality A Review. Cornea. 2018;37(3):400–404. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001479

8. Mannis M.J., Morrison T., Zadnik K. Personality trends in keratoconus: an analysis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(6):798–800. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060060084038

9. Cooke C.A., Cooper C., Dowds E. Keratoconus, myopia, and personality. Cornea. 2003;22(3):239–242. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200304000-00011

10. Rudisch B., D’Orio B., Compton M.T. Keratoconus and psychosis. Am. J Psychiatry. 2003;160(5):1011. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.1011

11. Schrhoff F., Leboyer M., Szoke A. Comorbidity between schizophrenia and keratoconus. Psychiatry Res. 2017;247:315–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.045

12. Kandarakis A., Karampelas M., Soumplis V. A Case of Bilateral Self Induced Keratoconus in a Patient With Tourette Syndrome Associated With Compulsive Eye Rubbing: case Report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011;11:28. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-11-28

13. Panikkar K., Manayath G., Rajaraman R. Progressive keratoconus, retinal detachment, and intracorneal silicone oil with obsessive compulsive eye rubbing. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(3):170–173. DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.192285

14. Khadka J., Schoneveld P.G., Pesudovs K. Development of a Keratoconus Specific Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(3):395–403. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001035

15. Kandel H., Pesudovs, K., Ferdi A. Psychometric Properties of the Keratoconus Outcomes Research A Save Sight Keratoconus Registry. Cornea. 2020;39(3):303–310. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002169

16. Jessica O.Y., Ralph E.G. Use of Acular LS in the Pain Management of Keratoconus: A Pilot Study. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;87(2):125–130. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181c75170

17. Kymes S.M., Walline J.J., Zadnik K. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(4);527–535. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.031

18. Khadka J., McAlinden C., Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of phthalmicquestionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(8):720–744. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000001

19. Lebedev O.I., Vykhodtsev A.V. Assessment of the quality of life and functional results after the combined technique of facorefractive surgery for high myopia. Modern technologies of cataract and refractive surgery. 2009;36–41 (In Russ.).

20. Saunier V., Mercier A.E., Gaboriau T. Vision related quality of lifeand dependency in French keratoconus patients: impact study. J CataractRefract Surg. 2017;43:1582–1590.

21. Gothwal V.K., Reddy S.P., Fathima A. Assessment of the impact of keratoconus on vision related quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2902–2910. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12 10783

22. Ozek D., Kemer O.E., Bayraktar N. Hydro cone lens visual performance and impact on quality of life in irregular corneas. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(6):458–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.04.003

23. Tatematsu Ogawa Y., Yamada M., Kawashima M. The disease burden of keratoconus in patients’ lives: comparisons to a Japanese normative sample. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34(1):13–16. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3180515282

24. Cingu A.K., Bez Y., Cinar Y. Impact of collagen cross linking on psychological distress and vision and health related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(6):349–353. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000129

25. Niziol L.M., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W. Long term outcomes in patients who received a corneal graft for keratoconus between 1980 and 1986. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(2):213–219.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.08.001

26. Kymes S.M., Walline J.J., Zadnik K. Changes in the quality of life of people with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(4):611–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.11.017

27. Labiris G., Giarmoukakis A., Sideroudi H. Impact of keratoconus, cross linking and cross linking combined with photorefractive keratectomy on self reported quality of life. Cornea. 2012;31(7):734–739. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823cbe85

28. Mahdaviazad H., Bamdad S., Roustaei N. Vision related quality oflife in Iranian patients with keratoconus: National Eye Institute—Vision Function Questionnaire 25. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(suppl 2):350–354. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000492

29. Zemova E., Eppig T., Seitz B. Interaction between topographic/ tomographic parameters and dry eye disease in keratoconus patients. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39(1):1–8. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2013.798667

30. Carracedo G., Gonzalez Meijome J.M., Martin Gil A. The influence of rigid gas permeable lens wear on the concentrations of dinucleotides in tears and the effect on dry eye signs and symptoms in keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(5):375–379. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.04.009

31. Vijaya K.G., Pesudovs K., Wright T.A. McMonnies. McMonnies questionnaire: enhancing screening for dry eye syndromes with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1401–1407. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4180

32. Mandathara P.S., Stapleton F.J., Kokkinakis J. Pilot Study of Corneal Sensitivity and Its Association in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2017;36(2):163–168. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000001077

33. Mostovoy D., Vinker S., Mimouni M. The association of keratoconus with blepharitis. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(3):339–344. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12643

34. Lee J.C., Chiu G.B., Bach D. Functional and visual improvement with prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem scleral lenses for irregular corneas. Cornea. 2013;32(12):1540–1543. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a73802

35. Carracedo G., Recchioni A., Alejandre Alba N. Signs and Symptoms o Dry Eye in Keratoconus Patients: A Pilot Study. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(11):1088–1094. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2014.987871

36. Carracedo G., Blanco M.S., Martin Gil A. Short term effect of scleral lens on the dry eye biomarkers in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(2):150–157. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000788

37. McAlinden C., Khadka J., de Freitas S.P.J. Psychometric properties of the NEI RQL 42 questionnaire in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7370–7374. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12 9969

38. Paranhos J.F., Paranhos A., Avila M.P. Analysis of the correlation between ophthalmic examination and quality of life outcomes following intracorneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(6):410–413.

39. Erdurmus M., Yildiz E.H., Abdalla Y.F. Contact lens related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35(3):123–127. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31819d1dd0

40. Weih L.M., Hassell J.B., Keeffe J. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(4): 927–935.

41. Gothwal V.K., Reddy S.P., Fathima A. Assessment of the impact of keratoconus on vision related quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2902–2910. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12 10783

42. Khor W.B., Wei R.H., Lim L. Keratoconus in Asians: demographics, clinical characteristics and visual function in a hospital based population. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;39:299–307. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02458.x

43. Ziakas N., Kanonidou E., Mikropoulos D. The impact of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus using the VF 14 questionnaire. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31:89–92.

44. Sahebjada S., Fenwick E.K., Xie J. Impact of keratoconus in the better eye and the worse eye on vision related quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:412–416. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12929

45. Cingu A.K., Bez Y., Cinar Y. Impact of collagen cross linking on psychological distress and vision and health related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(6):349–353. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000129

46. Moschos M.M., Gouliopoulos N.S., Kalogeropoulos C. Psychological aspects and depression in patients with symptomatic keratoconus. J Ophthalmol. 2018:Article ID 7314308. DOI: 10.1155/2018/7314308

47. Magli A., Forte R., Tortori A. Epithelium off corneal collagen crosslinking versus transepithelial cross linking for pediatric keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(5):597–601. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31826cf32d

48. McAlinden C., Khadka J., de Freitas J. Psychometric properties of the NEI RQL 42 questionnaire in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7370–7374. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12 9969

49. Park E.Y., Choi Y.I. Rasch analysis of the London Handicap Scale in stroke patients: a cross sectional study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:114. DOI: 10.1186/1743 0003 11 114

50. Pesudovs K., Gothwal V.K., Wright T. Remediating serious flaws in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(5):718–732. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.019

51. Kandel H., Pesudovs K., Watson S. L. Measurement of Quality of Life in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2020;39(3):386–393. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002170


Review

For citations:


Bikbov M.M., Usubov E.L., Kandarova I.I. Quality of Life Change in Patients with Keratoconus. Literature Review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022;19(4):727-733. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2022-4-727-733

Views: 724


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)