The Comparison of Results of Implantation in Two Groups with PanOptix IOL and Synergy IOL
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2023-2-228-232
Abstract
Purpose: compare the results of implantation of two types of premium IOLs (Synergy and PanOptix) according to several criteria.
Materials and methods. Patients were treated in the “EyeDoctor” ophthalmology clinic, Almaty, Kazakhstan. Synergy group: 8 people (4 men and 4 women.) PanOptix group: 25 people (9 men and 16 women).
Results. A month after the operation, results were special but comparable.
Conclusion. It can be concluded that the hybrid IOL Synergy is in not inferion in refractive results to well matched PanOptix.
About the Authors
E. M. Molokotin
“EyeDoctor” Ophthalmologic Clinic of MD Molokotin
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Molokotin Evgeny M., PhD, head physician of the EyeDoctor Clinic, Surgeon
A. Kekilbaiuly str., 264, unit 7, Almaty
Yu. I. Malakhova
“EyeDoctor” Ophthalmologic Clinic of MD Molokotin
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Malakhova Yuliya I., surgeon, laser surgeon
A. Kekilbaiuly str., 264, unit 7, Almaty
I. N. Aruchidi
“EyeDoctor” Ophthalmologic Clinic of MD Molokotin
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Aruchidi Igor N., surgeon
A. Kekilbaiuly str., 264, unit 7, Almaty
References
1. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Konovalova MM, Tsygankov AYu, Konovalov ME. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Presbyopia Correction. Literature Review. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2019;4(4):41–55 (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019‑4.4.6.
2. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Miyovich OP. The outcomes of the implantation of bifocal and trifocal IOLs for presbyopia. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2016;16(2):23–29 (In Russ.).
3. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu. Presbyopia‑correcting surgical options. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2016;16(2):4–14 (In Russ.).
4. Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, Naduvilath T, Naidoo KS. Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia: Systematic Review, Meta‑analysis, and Modelling. Ophthalmology. 2018 Oct;125(10):1492–1499. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013.
5. Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision Amer. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 1987;64:723–730.
6. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, Romaniuk D. Refrac tive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59(6):579–598. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.04.004.
7. Tan N, Zheng D, Ye J. Comparison of visual performance after implantation of 3 types of intraocular lenses: accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(5):693–698. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000425.
8. Bilgehan Sezgin Asena. Refractive outcomes, visual acuity, spectacle independence, and optical phenomena after cataract removal or refractive clear lens replacement: a comparison of two trifocal intraocular lens models. New in ophthalmology. 2020;1:32–42 (In Russ.).
9. Ruiz‑Mesa R, Abengozar‑Vela A., Ruiz‑Santos M. Functional results of implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens and a lens with an increased depth of focus: a comparative study. New in ophthalmology. 2020;3:47–52 (In Russ.).
10. Pershin КB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov АYu, Antonov EA. First Experience of Multifocal and Toric Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses Implantation (ShortTerm Analysis). Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(3):408–414 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816‑5095‑2021‑3‑408‑414.
11. Belikova EI, Borzykh VA. Results of Trifocal Intraocular Lenses Implantation in Patients with Cataract and Presbyopia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(3):248–255 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816‑5095‑2018‑3‑248‑255.
12. Maliugin BÉ, Sobolev NP, Fomina OV, Belokopytov AV. Comparative analysis of the functional results after implantation of various diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(1):80–89 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma202013601180.
13. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Konovalova MM, Tsygankov AYu, Konovalov ME, Temirov NE. Short Term Analysis of New Single‑Piece Aspheric Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2019;16(1):19–25 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816‑5095‑2019‑1‑19‑25.
14. Alfonso JF, Puchades C, Fernandez‑Vega L, Merayo C, Montes‑Mico R. Contrast sensitivity comparison between AcrySofReSTOR and Acri.LISA aspheric intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(7):471–477. doi: 10.3928/1081597X‑20090728‑04.
15. Molokotin EM, Malakhova YuI. Presbyopia correction methodology using “Monovision” method with combination implantation trifocal and monofocal IOL. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2021;5(40):62–66 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/23124911‑2021‑5‑62‑66.
Review
For citations:
Molokotin E.M., Malakhova Yu.I., Aruchidi I.N. The Comparison of Results of Implantation in Two Groups with PanOptix IOL and Synergy IOL. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2023;20(2):228-232. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2023-2-228-232
Views:
2119
Email this article 