Experience of Xenoplast Drainage Using in Non-penetrating Surgery of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-612-617
Abstract
Purpose: to evaluate the hypotensive efficacy and safety of Xenoplast drainage in non-penetrating surgery of primary open-angle glaucoma. Materials and methods. The analysis of the medical records of 157 patients (157 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who underwent hypotensive non-penetrating surgery (non-penetrating deep sclerectomy — NDSE) using Xenoplast drainage (group 1) and without drainage (group 2). The results were evaluated for up to 36 months. Results. The positive effect of the operation, including absolute and relative success, was 96% in group 1 on day 6, then gradually decreased and was 74 % after 36 months. In group 2, the positive effect was 100 % and decreased to 58 % at the appropriate time of follow-up. In both groups, in the early postoperative period, there was a low percentage of eye complications (5.4 % and 4.8 %), typical for non-penetrating antiglaucoma surgeries. The number of descemetogoniopunctures, performed as the second stage of NDSE, was insufficient, both in the 1st group — 42 %, and in the 2nd — 51 %. Conclusion. All of the above points to the advantage of using Xenoplast drainage during non-penetrating deep sclerectomy.
About the Authors
T. V. Gavrilova
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University; Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Gavrilova - MD, Professor, RAS Corresponding Member, head of the Ophthalmology Department.
Petropavlovskaja str., 26, Perm, 614990; Pushkin str., 85, Perm, 614045
Yu. A. Kozyreva
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Kozyreva - resident of the Ophthalmology Department.
Petropavlovskaja str., 26, Perm, 614990
S. N. Mukhamadeeva
Perm Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana N. Mukhamadeeva - head of the 2nd Ophthalmology Department.
Pushkin str., 85, Perm, 614045
L. I. Solovyeva
E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa I. Solovyeva - PhD, Associate Professor.
Petropavlovskaja str., 26, Perm, 614990
M. V. Chereshneva
Institute of Immunology and Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mаrgarita V. Chereshneva - MD, Professor, principal researcher, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation.
Pervomajskaja str., 91, Ekaterinburg, 620041
References
1. Primary open-angle glaucoma. National guidelines / Edited by EA Egorov, AV Kuroedova. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2023:1032 (In Russ.). doi: 10.33029/9704-7661-1-LFP-2023-1-1032.
2. Clinical guidelines: Glaucoma primary open-angle. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2024 (In Russ.). URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/96_2 (аccessed 27.02.2025).
3. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;105 (Suppl 1):1–169. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines.
4. Krylova IA, Goydin AP, Pronichkina MM, Yablokova NV, Gurko TS. Analysis of laser descemetogoniopuncture outcomes depending on term of realization after non-penetrating antiglaucomatous surgery. Annals of Tambov University. 2014;19(4):1163–1165 (In Russ.).
5. Shunkevich ON, Melikhova IA, Boriskina LN, Balalin SV. The role of descemetogoniopuncture in normalization of intraocular pressure with increased ophthalmotonus in the early postoperative period after microinvasive non-penetrating deep sclerectomy. Annals of Orenburg State University. 2012;12(148):232–233 (In Russ.).
6. Petrov SYu. Principles of modern incisional surgery for glaucoma by the 4th Edition of the Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma of the European Glaucoma Society. RMJ Clinical ophthalmology. 2017;18(3):184–189 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-3-184-189.
7. Tereshchenko AV, Trifanenkova IG, Molotkova IA, Zhukov SS. Drainage devices in glaucoma surgery. National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(2):88–96. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25700/NJG.2020.02.10.
8. Gavrilova TV, Lyubimov KS, Mukhamadeeva SN, Chereshneva MV. Using of modern types of drainage in glaucoma surgery: our experience. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):71–76 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-71-76.
9. Anisimova SYu, Anisimov SI, Rogacheva IV. Long-term results of surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma using collagen drainage resistant to biodegradation. National Journal glaucoma. 2011;2:28–33 (In Russ.).
10. Fedorov SN, Kozlov VI, Timoshkina NT. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery. 1989;3(4):52–55 (In Russ.).
11. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Kosova IV, Solovyova GM. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and implantation of collagen drainage in the surgical treatment of glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2022;21(2):42–50 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-2-42-50.
Review
For citations:
Gavrilova T.V., Kozyreva Yu.A., Mukhamadeeva S.N., Solovyeva L.I., Chereshneva M.V. Experience of Xenoplast Drainage Using in Non-penetrating Surgery of Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):612-617. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-612-617
Views:
12
Email this article 