Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

PRESERFLOTM Microshunt Implantation and Multiple Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Surgery

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-4-804-810

Abstract

Purpose: сomparative analysis of the effectiveness of PRESERFLO™ microshunt implantation and multiple NPDS in patients with refractory glaucoma.

Patients and methods. A total of 64 patients (67 eyes), including 27 male and 37 female with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), were examined and operated on as part of an open prospective study. All patients underwent implantation of the Preserflo™ drainage system or non-penetrating deep sclerectomy after previously performed surgical interventions for POAG (NPDS and/or implantation of various drainage models). The patients were divided into 2 groups — the Preserflo group (group I, 28 patients) and the NPDS group (group II, 36 patients). The follow-up period was 1.0 ± 0.1 years.

Results. In the study groups, complications such as hyphema (n = 2 in group I and n = 3 in group II) and ciliochoroidal detachment (n = 1 in group I and n = 2 in group II) were identified in the early postoperative period. In group I, severe hypotension was noted on day 1 after surgery (7.4 ± 1.8 mmHg compared with 31.0 ± 4.7 before surgery). Subsequently, an increase in IOP was noted to 18.3 ± 6.1 during the follow-up period of 1 year. In 17 out of 28 patients (60.7 %), an IOP of less than 18 mmHg was determined, of which 2 were without drug therapy. It was regarded as a “relative” and “absolute” success, respectively. In group II, in the early postoperative period, the dynamics of the decrease in IOP was less pronounced (17.5 ± 3.8 mmHg on the first day after surgery, with a further increase to 26.6 mmHg after a year of follow-up) even against the background of the maximum medication regimen. In the maximum follow-up period, the average number of drugs was used for reducing the IOP in group I was 0.94 ± 0.16, and in group II — 2.28 ± 0.87 (differences are statically significant, p < 0.05). The frequency of “relative” success in group I after 6 months and 1 year of follow-up was significantly higher than in group II (43.4 % versus 25 % and 53.6 % versus 30.6 %, respectively, p < 0.05).

Conclusion. The paper presents the first data in the literature on the comparative analysis of the effectiveness of Preserflo drainage implantation and non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in patients with refractory and repeatedly operated primary open-angle glaucoma. The advantage of the implantation of the Preserflo drainage in relation to the antihypertensive effect and reduction of the number of instillations of antihypertensive drugs have been shown.

About the Authors

К. B. Pershin
“Eximer” Eye; Academy of Postgraduate Education of The Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Pershin Kirill B. - MD, Professor, medical director, Ophthalmology Faculty Professor.

Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147; Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371



N. F. Pashinova
“Eximer” Eye; Academy of Postgraduate Education of The Federal Medical-Biological Agency
Russian Federation

Pashinova Nadezhda F. - MD, Professor, medical director, Ophthalmology Faculty Professor.

Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147; Volokolamskoe highway, 91, Moscow, 125371



A. Yu. Tsygankov
“Eximer” Eye Center
Russian Federation

Tsygankov Alexander Yu. - PhD, scientific advisor, ophthalmologist.

Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147



I. V. Kosova
“Eximer” Eye Center
Russian Federation

Kosova Irina V. – ophthalmologist.

Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147



E. A. Korneeva
“Eximer” Eye Center
Russian Federation

Korneeva Ekaterina A. - PhD, ophthalmologist.

Marksistskaya str., 3/1, Moscow, 109147



References

1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.

2. Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:673–679. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)91288-9.

3. Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study G Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:804–814. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024.

4. Caprioli J, Kim JH, Friedman DS, Kiang T, Moster MR, Parrish RK 2nd, Rorer EM, Samuelson T, Tarver ME, Singh K, Eydelman MB. Special Commentary: Supporting Innovation for Safe and Effective Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Summary of a Joint Meeting of the American Glaucoma Society and the Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, February 26, 2014. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1795–1801. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.029.

5. Kalala A. Gillmann K, Mermoud A. Prospective evaluation of penetrating deep sclerectomy in advanced open-angle glaucoma: filtration surgery adapted to resource scarcity in developing countries. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020;43(3):228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.07.024.

6. Bouillot A, Pierru A, Blumen-Ohana E, Brasnu E, Baudouin C, Labbé A. Changes in choroidal thickness and optic nerve head morphology after filtering surgery: nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1031-3.

7. Manasses DT, Au L. The New Era of Glaucoma Microstent Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2016;5:135–146. doi: 10.1007/s40123-016-0054-6.

8. Vinod K, Gedde SJ. Clinical investigation of new glaucoma procedures. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28:187–193. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000336.

9. Richter GM, Coleman AL. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:189–206. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80490.

10. Erichev VP, Pershin KB, Volzhanin AV, Makarova AS. Microshunt PRESERFLO™ for microinvasive glaucoma surgery. National Journal glaucoma. 2025;24(2):61–72 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2025-24-2-61-72.

11. Pinchuk L, Riss I, Batlle JF, Kato YP, Martin JB, Arrieta E, Palmberg P, Parrish RK, Weber BA, Kwon Y, Parel JM. The use of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-blockstyrene) as a microshunt to treat glaucoma. Regen Biomater. 2016;3:137–142. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbw005.

12. Beckers HJM, Aptel F, Webers CAB, Bluwol E, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, GarciaFeijoo J, Lachkar Y, Mendez-Hernandez CD, Riss I, Shao H, Pinchuk L, Angeles R, Sadruddin O, Shaarawy TM. Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO(R) MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5:195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.008.

13. Batlle JF, Corona A, Albuquerque R. Long-term Results of the PRESERFLO MicroShunt in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma From a Single-center Nonrandomized Study. J Glaucoma. 2021;30:281–286. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001734.

14. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Korneeva EA, Solovyeva GM. Preliminary outcomes of PreserFlo® microshunt implantation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2025;24(1):24–31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2025-24-1-24-31.

15. Pillunat KR, Herber R, Haase MA, Jamke M, Jasper CS, Pillunat LE. PRESERFLO MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: first results on efficacy and safety. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100:e779–e790. doi: 10.1111/aos.14968.

16. Fea AM, Laffi GL, Martini E, Economou MA, Caselgrandi P, Sacchi M, Au L. Effectiveness of MicroShunt in Patients with Primary Open-Angle and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Retrospective European Multicenter Study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022;5:210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.08.005.

17. Nobl M, Freissinger S, Kassumeh S, Priglinger S, Mackert MJ. One-year outcomes of microshunt implantation in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0256670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256670.

18. Durr GM, Schlenker MB, Samet S, Ahmed IIK. One-year outcomes of stand-alone ab externo SIBS microshunt implantation in refractory glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022;106:71–79. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317299.

19. Wagner FM, Schuster AK, Munder A, Muehl M, Chronopoulos P, Pfeifer N, Hofmann EM. Comparison of subconjunctival microinvasive glaucoma surgery and trabeculectomy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022; 100:e1120–e1126. doi: 10.1111/aos.15042.

20. Governatori L, Oliverio L, Mermoud A, Scampoli A, Sarati F, Carradori A, Catalani R, Monaco C, Caporossi T, Rizzo S. PreserFlo MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;263(4):885–899. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06649-w.

21. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AI, Solov’eva GM, Batalina LV, Gurmizov EP, Kashnikov VV, Ganichev GA, Malyutina IS. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with Ex-Press R-50 drainage implantation in glaucoma surgical treatment. National Journal glaucoma. 2018;17(1):43–53 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25700/NJG.2018.01.05.

22. Gubser PA, Pfeiffer V, Hug S, Shang X, Lincke JB, Häner NU, Zinkernagel MS, Unterlauft JD. PRESERFLO MicroShunt implantation versus trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma: a two-year follow-up study. Eye Vis (Lond). 2023;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00369-8.

23. Jamke M, Herber R, Haase MA, Jasper CS, Pillunat LE, Pillunat KR. PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261(10):2901–2915. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4.

24. Zweifel LAB, Storp JJ, Vietmeier FE, Danzer MF, Merté RL, Eter N, Brücher VC. Preserflo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy: Efficacy and Surgical Success within a Heterogenous Patient Cohort. Life (Basel). 2024;14(9):1171. doi: 10.3390/life14091171.


Review

For citations:


Pershin К.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu., Kosova I.V., Korneeva E.A. PRESERFLOTM Microshunt Implantation and Multiple Non-penetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma Surgery. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(4):804-810. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-4-804-810

Views: 34


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)