Topographic Localization of the Demarcation Line after UV Corneal Crosslinking in Progressive Keratoconus
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-32-37
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the topographic location of the demarcation line in in different areas of the cornea after standard corneal crosslinking.
Patients and methods. 12 patients (15 eyes) with keratoconus of stages 1–2 of Amsler-Kruimerich classification were observed. UV cross-linking was performed in all patients according to the standard Dresden protocol with 0.1% aqueous solution of riboflavin. The patients underwent optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment of the eye on “DRI OCT Triton” (“Topcon”, Japan) in different areas of the cornea to assess the location of the demarcation line. Results. Demarcation line was revealed in
1 month after standard corneal cross-linking in most cases (87%). Biomicroscopy showed that DL limited the anterior and middle
laers of the stroma from the posterior one. The stromal demarcation line depth according to OCT averaged 305.73 ± 41.08 μm (range of 282–345 μm) at the center, nasally — 215.16 ± 35.5 μm (range of 160–289 μm) and temporally 205,23 ± 32.81 μm (range of 190–276 μm). A significant difference in the depth of DL localization in the central zone of the cornea and a 6 mm zone (p < 0.001) was noted. Conclusion. The corneal stromal (обычно) demarcation line is one of the indicators of the depth of photochemical process of corneal cross-linking. Optimal timing of detection of DL following corneal collagen crosslinking is 2 weeks — 3 months. The depth of DL in the corneal studied areas is different; it is deeper in the central zone than in the peripheral ones.
About the Authors
M. M. BikbovRussian Federation
MD, professor, Head
V. K. Surkova
Russian Federation
MD, professor, Leading Research Officer
A. R. Khalimov
Russian Federation
PhD, Head of Department
E. L. Usubov
Russian Federation
PhD, Leading Research Officer
L. I. Khalimova
Russian Federation
Junior Research Officer
References
1. Бикбов М.М., Бикбова Г.М. Эктазии роговицы. М.: Офтальмология; 2011:86–87. [Bikbov M.M., Bikbova G.M. Corneal ectasia. M.: Oftalmologija, 2011:86–87 (in Russ.)]
2. Бикбов М.М., Халимов А.Р., Усубов Э.Л. Ультрафиолетовый кросслинкинг роговицы. Вестник РАМН. 2016;71(3). [Bikbov M.M., Khalimov A.R., Usubov E.L. Ultraviolet Corneal Crosslinking. Annals of Russian academy of medical sciences=Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2016;71(3) (in Russ.)] DOI: 10.15690/vramn562
3. Бикбов М.М., Суркова В.К., Зайнуллина Н.Б., Гумерова С. Г., Морфологические изменения роговицы после лечения кератоконуса методом кросслинкинга роговичного коллагена. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2014;14(3):18–22. [Bikbov M, Bikbova G, Surkova V, Zainullina N, Gumerova S. Morphological changes in cornea after corneal collagen cross-linking as keratoconus treatment. J Cataract Refract. Surg=Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2014;14(3):18–22 (in Russ.)]
4. Халимов А.Р., Бикбов М.М., Дроздова Г.А., Шевчук Н.Е., Казакбаева Г.М., Усубов Э.Л. Влияние стандартного и трансэпителиального УФ-сшивания роговицы на динамику системного и локального уровня цитокинов у пациентов с кератоконусом. Российский иммунологический журнал 2016;10(1);19:65–72. [Khalimov A.R., Bikbov M.M., Drozdova G.A., Shevchuk N.E., Kazakbaeva G.M., Usubov E.P. The influence of standard and transepithelial UV corneal crosslinking on dynamics of system and local cytokines levels in keratoconus patients. Russian Journal of Immunology=Rossiyskiy immunologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016;10(1);19: 65–72. (in Russ.)]
5. Wollensak G., Spoerl E., Seiler T. Riboflavin/Ultraviolet-A Induced Collagen Crosslinking for the Treatment of Keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol 2003;135(5): 620–627.
6. Kymionis G.D., Grentzelos M.A., Kankariya V.P., Liakopoulos D.A., Portaliou D.M., Tsoulnaras K.I., Karavitaki A.E., Pallikaris A.I. Safety of high intensity corneal crosslinking. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1337–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2013.11.041
7. Seiler T., Hafezi F. Corneal Cross-Linking-Induced Stromal demarcation Line. Cornea 2006;25(9):1057–1059. DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000225720.38748.58
8. Moramarco A., Iovieno A., Sartori A., Fontana L. Corneal stromal demarcation line after accelerated crosslinking using continuous and pulsed light. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2546–2551.DOI.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.033
9. Kymionis G.D., Tsoulnaras K.I., Grentzelos M.A., et al. Corneal stromal demarcation line after standard and high-intensity collagen crosslinking determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J. Cataract Refract. Surg 2014;40:736–740. DOI.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.029
10. Doors M., Tahzib N.G., Eggink F.A., et al. Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to study corneal changes after collagen crosslinking. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009;148:844–851.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.031.
11. Malta J.B., Renesto A.C., Moscovici B.K., et al. Stromal demarcation line induced by corneal cross-linking in eyes with keratoconus and non-keratoconic asymmetric topography. Cornea 2015;34:199–203. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000305.
12. Kymionis G.D., Grentzelos M.A., Plaka A.D., et al. Evaluation of the corneal collagen crosslinking using anterior optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2013;32:907–910. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31828733ea
13. Ng A.L.K., Chan T.C.Y., Lai J.S.M. and Cheng A.C.K. Comparison of the central and peripheral cornel stromal demarcation line depth in conventional versus accelerated collagen cross-linking. Cornea 2015;34(11):1432–1436. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000626
14. Yam J.C., Cheng A.C. Reduced cross-linking demarcation line depth at the peripheral cornea after corneal collagen cross-linking. J Refract Surg. 2013;29 (1):49–53. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20121228-03
15. Koller T., Schumacher S., Fankhauser F II, et al. Riboflavin/ultraviolet a crosslinking of the paracentral cornea. Cornea. 2013;32:165–168. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318269059b
16. Bikbova, G., Bikbov, M. Standard corneal collagen crosslinking versus transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking, 24 months follow-up: randomized control trial. Acta Ophthalmologica; 2016;94(7):е600-е606. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13032
17. Bikbova G., Bikbov M. Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking by iontophoresis of riboflavin. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(l):30–34. DOI: 10.1111/aos.12235
18. Bouheraoua N., Juove L., Sanharawi M., et al. Optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy following three different protocols of corneal collagencrosslinking in keratoconus. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:7601–7609. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15662
19. Tomita M., Mita M., Huseynova T. Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen crosslinking. J. Cataract Rafract. Surg. 2014;40:1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcrs.2013.12.012
Review
For citations:
Bikbov M.M., Surkova V.K., Khalimov A.R., Usubov E.L., Khalimova L.I. Topographic Localization of the Demarcation Line after UV Corneal Crosslinking in Progressive Keratoconus. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(1):32-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-32-37