Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

A Personalized Approach to the Treatment of Patients with Latent Stage Angle-Closure Glaucoma

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3S-566-571

Abstract

A latent stage of angle-closure glaucoma is a functional unit, which leads to the progression of glaucoma in the absence of treatment.

Purpose. To determine tactics and to evaluate the results of a personalized approach to treatment in patients with a latent stage of angle-closure glaucoma.

Patients and methods. An analysis of surgical treatment of 35 patients (56 eyes) with latent stage of  angleclosure glaucoma has been carried out. The first group (I) included patients with accommodative a  transparent lens, the absence or the presence of ametropia is not more than 1.0 diopter, a high rating for the quality of life according to the questionnaire VF14 (Visual Function). All patients in group I were treated with a personalized combined laser iridectomy with a preliminary coagulation of the iris. The second group (II) included patients with a little accommodative, transparent or opaque lens, the absence or presence of  ametropia more than 1.0 D, a low ranking for the quality of life. The second group of patients was divided into  two subgroups: IIA — all the patients underwent personalized combined laser iridectomy with a preliminary coagulation of the iris; IIB — all the patients underwent phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. The result of surgical treatment was evaluated in terms of the depth of the anterior chamber, the degree of  opening of the anterior chamber angle in accordance with the classification of van-Beuningen, according to the questionnaire of quality of life VF14.

Results. The degree of opening of the eye anterior chamber angle and anterior chamber depth have been increased in all the groups, but the indicators have varied. In group IIB the results were significantly effective and credible. In group I, the ranking of quality of life after laser iridectomy was not changed, remained consistently high; in the IIB it was significantly increased, while in the IIA it remained low. 

Conclusion. Personalized combined laser iridectomy with a preliminary coagulation of the iris and phacoemulsification with IOL implantation are effective methods of treatment the latent stage of angle-closure  glaucoma. The laser iridectomy as a treatment of latent stage of angle-closure glaucoma is sufficient in the case of conserved accommodation, of the crystalline lens, the absence of ametropia and the high rating for the quality of life questionnaire VF14. Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation is required in the case of ametropia, poor accommodation or its absence and especially cataract changes in the lens, the low for the quality of life.

About the Authors

E. I. Belikova
Federal Institute of the Professional Development; Ophthalmology Clinic of Dr. Belikova
Russian Federation

МD, рrofessor, head of the department of ophthalmology chief physician of the clinic

Gamalei str., 15, Moscow, 123098, Russian Federation

Budenny ave., 26/2, Moscow, 105118, Russian Federation



G. A. Sharova
Ophthalmology Clinic of Dr. Belikova
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

Budenny ave., 26/2, Moscow, 105118, Russian Federation



References

1. Shchuko A.G., Chesheyko Ye.Yu., Yuryeva T.N. Criteria for differential diagnostics of functional angular block — latent stage of closed — angle glaucoma. Annals of Orenburg State University = Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012;148(12):239–243 (In Russ.).

2. Danilenko O.V., Bol’shunov A.V., Il’ina T.S. Laser iridectomy influence on anatomical and functional characteristics in primary angle‑closure glaucoma and relative papillary block. National Journal of Glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2014;13(4):48–55 (In Russ.).

3. Egorova E.V., Fayzieva U.S. Phacoemulsification is an operation of choice in primary angle closure glaucoma with block induced by the lens. Glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2012;3:12–17 (In Russ.).

4. Jacobi P.C., Dietlein T.S., Lеuke C. Primary phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for acute angle‑closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(9):1597–1603. DOI: 10.1016/S0161‑6420(02)01123‑5

5. Lam D.S., Leung D.Y., Tham C.C., Li F.C., Kwong Y.Y. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1134–1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.10.033

6. Belikova E.I., Sharova G.A. A method for diagnosing the functional angular block of the anterior chamber of the eye in the latent stage of angle‑closure glaucoma. Patent RU 2730971, 19.03.2020 (In Russ.).

7. Alonso J., Espallargues M., Andersen T.F., Cassard S.D., Dunn E., Bernth‑Petersen P. International applicability of the VF‑14. An index of visual function in patients with cataracts. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(5):799–807. DOI: 10.1016/s0161‑6420(97)30230‑9

8. Linder M., Chang T.S., Scott I.U., Hay D., Chambers K., Sibley L.M. Validity of the visual function index (VF‑14) in patients with retinal disease. Arch. Ophthalmol.1999;117(12):1611–1616. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.12.1611

9. Libman E.S., Galperin M.R., Grishina E.E., Senkevich N.Yu. Methods for evaluation of the life quality in ophthalmologic patients. Russian ophthalmological journal. Clinical ophthalmology = Rossiyskiy oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2002;3(3):119–121 (In Russ.).

10. Belikova E.I., Sharova G.A. Reactive hypertension after combined laser iridectomy with adequate medication. Effective pharmacotherapy = Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya 2020;16(21):6–11 (In Russ.). DOI 10.33978/2307‑3586‑2020‑16‑21‑6‑11

11. Belikova E.I., Sharova G.A. Method for determining the management approach to patients with a latent stage of closed‑angle glaucoma and syndrome of pigment dispersion. Patent RU 2726404, 19.03.2020 (In Russ.).

12. Trubilin V.N., Kaira N.A. A novel method of combined phacoemulsification and vacuum trabeculoplasty ab interno. Оphthalmology in Russia = Oftal’mologiya. 2014;11(1):28–36 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18008/1816‑5095‑2014‑1‑28‑37

13. Imaizumi M., Takaki Y., Yamashita H. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for acute angle closure not treated or previously treated by laser iridotomy. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2006;32(1):85–90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.11.014

14. Greve E.L. Primary angle closure glaucoma: extracapsular cataract extraction or filtering procedure? Int. Ophthalmol. 1988;12 (3):157–162. DOI: 10.1007/bf00129999

15. Komarova M.G. Where are we now? Glaucoma News = Novosti glaukomy. 2019;49(1):61–63 (In Russ.).

16. Azuara‑Blanco A., Burr J., Ramsay C., et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle‑closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389–1397. DOI: 10.1016/S0140‑6736(16)30956‑4

17. Komarova M.G. Changing the paradigm of surgical treatment of glaucoma — antiglaucomatous lens surgery, as the operation of the first choice. Glaucoma News = Novosti glaukomy. 2016;37(1):112–117 (In Russ.).

18. Moshetova L.K., Cochergin S.A., Alekseev I.B., Samoylenko A.I., Beisekeeva J.S. Anatomic‑functional changes in anterior chamber after phacoemulsification in eyes with primary angle‑closure glaucoma. Glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2011;2:44–51 (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Belikova E.I., Sharova G.A. A Personalized Approach to the Treatment of Patients with Latent Stage Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(3s):566-571. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3S-566-571

Views: 1829


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)