Loss of Corneal Endothelial Cells during Glaucoma Surgery

As known, there are changes in the biomechanical properties of the fibrous tunic in glaucoma. This is also due to the imbalance between the formation and loss of collagen fibers. The cornea is a highly sensitive tunic of the eyeball, endothelium is one of the target organs in the formation of pathological changes in primary open-angle glaucoma, and endothelial dysfunction, according to many authors, plays a significant role in its pathogenesis. The unintended consequences of glaucoma surgery lead to a progressive loss of corneal endothelial cells, which can lead to corneal decompensation. In the proposed literature review, we analyzed more than 30 publications by authors representing the results of multicenter studies of the pathological effects of antiglaucoma operations on the corneal endothelium in patients with various types of uncompensated glaucoma. The analysis of both classic fistulizing type operations and modern, so-called micro-invasive techniques (MIGS), including the use of various drains and devices, is presented. Thus, the smallest decrease in the density of endothelial cells was noted during deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy. The use of mitomycin C in glaucoma surgery significantly improving the prognosis, but increases the loss of endothelial cells in both high and low concentrations. The highest rates of loss of corneal endothelial cells are noted during using valves and shunts. Ex-PRESS shunt implantation is associated with a significant loss of corneal endothelial cell density in the immediate area to the drainage tube, and therefore, shunt implantation should not be considered as an option for eyes with corneal dysfunction. In addition, the authors prove that the drainage device changes its position in the anterior chamber, especially when performing massage and self-massage of filtration bleb, which leads to a greater loss of density of corneal endothelial cells.

primary open angle glaucoma, trabeculectomy, microinvasive glaucoma surgery, drainage, density of corneal endothelial cells, loss of corneal endothelial cells

1. Janson B.J., Alward W.L., Kwon Y.H., Bettis D.I., Fingert J.H., Provencher L.M., Goins K.M., Wagoner M.D., Greiner M.A. Glaucoma-associated corneal endothelial cell damage: A review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018;63(4):500–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.11.002

2. Pasechnikova N.V., Mikheytseva I.N., Elskiy V.N. Endothelium regulation problems in pathogenesis of primary glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma = Nacional’nyj Zhurnal Glaukoma. 2014;13(4):5–12 (In Russ.).

3. Cho S.W., Kim J.M., Choi C.Y., Park K.H. Changes in corneal endothelial cell density in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2009;53(6):569– 573. DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0740-1

4. Malakhova A.I., Deev L.A., Molchanov V.V. Cornea changes at patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma = Nacional’nyj zhurnal glaukoma. 2015;14(1):84–93 (In Russ.).

5. Alekseev I.B., Strakhov V.V., Melnikova N.V., Popova A.A.: Changes in the fibrous tunic of the eye in patients with newly diagnosed primary openangle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma = Nacional’nyj Zhurnal Glaukoma. 2016;15(1):13–24 (In Russ.).

6. Ang G.S., Bochmann F., Townend J., Azuara-Blanco A. Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(4):259–262. DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0b013e31815c3a93

7. Hau S., Barton K. Corneal complications of glaucoma surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009; 20: 131–136. DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e328325a54b

8. Kim M.S, Kim K.N., Kim C.S Changes in Corneal Endothelial Cell after Ahmed Glaucom Valve Implantation and Trabeculectomy: 1-Year Follow-up. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016;30:416–425. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.416

9. Arnavielle S., Lafontaine P.O., Bidot S., Creuzot-Garcher C., D’Athis P., Bron A.M. Corneal endothelial cell changes after trabeculectomy and deep sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(3):324–328. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180391a04

10. Sihota R., Sharma T., Agarwal H.C. Intraoperative mitomycin C and the corneal endothelium. Acta P Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76(1):80–82. DOI: 10.1034/j.16000420.1998.760115.x

11. Storr-Paulsen T., Norregaard J.C., Ahmed S., Storr-Paulsen A. Corneal endothelial cell loss after mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(8):654–657. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181659e56

12. Shin D.B., Lee S.B., Kim C.S. Effects of viscoelastic material on the corneal endothelial cells in trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin-C. Kor J Ophthalmol. 2003;17:83–90. DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2003.17.2.83

13. Shaheer M., Amjad A., Ahmed N. Comparison of Mean Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss after Trabeculectomy with and without Mitomycin C. Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28(4):301–303. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.04.301

14. Higashide T., Nishino T., Sakaguchi K., Yamada Y., Sugiyama K. Determinants of Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Trabeculectomy With Mitomycin. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(1):61–67. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001108

15. Okumura N., Matsumoto D., Okazaki Y., Koizumi N., Sotozono C., Kinoshita S., Mori K. Wide-field contact specular microscopy analysis of corneal endothelium post trabeculectomy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(4):751–757. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3889-1

16. Lee E.K., Yun Y.J., Lee J.E., Yim J.H., Kim C.S. Changes in corneal endothelial cells after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:361–367. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.04.016

17. Tan A.N., Webers C.A., Berendschot T.T., de Brabander J., de Witte P.M., Nuijts R.M., Schouten J.S., Beckers H.J. Corneal endothelial cell loss after Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation in the anterior chamber. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:91–96. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13161

18. Gedde S.J., Herndon L.W., Brandt J.D., Budenz D.L., Feuer W.J., Schiffman J.C. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):804–814. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024

19. Nassiri N., Nassiri N., Majdi N.M., Salehi M., Panahi N., Djalilian A.R., Peyman G.A. Corneal endothelial cell changes after Ahmed valve and Molteno glaucoma implants. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011;42:394–399. DOI: 10.3928/1542887720110812-04

20. Casini G., Loiudice P., Pellegrini M., Sframeli A.T., Martinelli P., Passani A., Nardi M. Trabeculectomy Versus EX-PRESS Shunt Versus Ahmed Valve Implant: Shortterm Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015;160(6):1185– 1190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.022

21. Tan A.N., de Witte P.M., Webers C.A., Berendschot T.T., De Brabander J., Schouten J.S., Beckers H.J. Baerveldt drainage tube motility in the anterior chamber. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24:364–370. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000379

22. Law S.K., Coleman A.L., Caprioli J. Dynamic tube movement of Ahmed glaucoma valve. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(8):628–631. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996f33

23. Dermott M.L., Swendris R.P., Shin D.H., Juzych M.S., Cowden J.W. Corneal endothelial cell counts after Molteno implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:93–96. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73530-5

24. Arimura S., Miyake S., Iwasaki K., Gozawa M., Matsumura T., Takamura Y., Inatani M. Randomised Clinical Trial for Postoperative Complications after Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy with 2-Year Follow-Up. Sci Rer. 2018;8:161–68. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34627-w 8

25. Gillmann K., Bravetti G., Mermoud A., Mansouri K. Anterior Chamber XEN Gel Stent Movements: The Impact on Corneal Endothelial Cell Density. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(6):e93–e95. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001200

26. Kasahara M., Shoji N., Matsumura K. The Influence of Trabectome Surgery on Corneal Endothelial Cells. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(2):150–153. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001128

27. Hau S., Scott A., Bunce C., Barton K. Corneal endothelial morphology in eyes implanted with anterior chamber aqueous shunts. Cornea. 2011;30:50–55. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181e16d7d

28. Koo E.B., Hou J., Han Y. Effect of glaucoma tube shunt parameters on cornea endothelial cells in patients with Ahmed valve implants. Cornea. 2015;34(1):37–41. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000301

29. Mendrinos E., Dosso A., Sommerhalder J., Shaarawy T. Coupling of HRT II and ASOCT to evaluate corneal endothelial cell loss and in vivo visualization of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Eye (Lond). 2009;23(9):1836–1844. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.321

30. Netland P.A., Sarkisian S.R., Moster M.R., Ahmed I.I., Condon G., Salim S., Sherwood M.B., Siegfried C.J. Randomized, prospective, comparative trial of EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device versus trabeculectomy (XVT study). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;157:433–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.014

31. Tojo N., Hayashi A., Miyakoshi A. Corneal decompensation following filtering surgery with the Ex-PRESS (®) mini glaucoma shunt device. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2015;17:499–502. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S81050

32. Wang W., Zhang X. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing EXPRESS implantation with trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 014 Jun 27;9(6):e100578. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100578

33. Konopińska J., Deniziak N., Saeed E., Bartczak A., Zalewska R., Mariak Z., Rękas M. Prospective randomized study comparing combined phaco-ExPRESS and Phacotrabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma treatment: 12 month follow-up. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:720109. DOI: 10.1155/2015/720109

34. Gonzalez-Rodriguez J.M., Trope G.E., Drori-Wagschal L., Jinapriya D., Buys Y.M. Comparison of trabeculectomy versus Ex-PRESS: 3-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmology. 2016;100(9):1269–1273. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307161

35. Omatsu S., Hirooka K., Nitta E., Ukegawa K. Changes in corneal endothelial cells after trabeculectomy and EXPRESS shunt: 2-year follow-up. BMC Ophthalmology. 2018;18(1):243. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0913-0