To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Plasmapheresis as a Method for the Graft Disease Prevention in Patients with Keratoplasty
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-946-954
Abstract
Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness of plasmapheresis as a method for preventing and treating the graft rejection reaction in corneal transplantation.
Patients and methods. The study involved patients with surgical pathology of the cornea, who underwent a prophylactic course of plasmapheresis procedures and underwent penetrating keratoplasty (Main group); and patients with surgical pathology of the cornea who underwent penetrating keratoplasty, but did not undergo plasmapheresis (Comparison group), whose data were analyzed retrospectively. The control group consisted of conditionally healthy individuals of both genders. Subgroups of patients with high and low risk keratoplasty were also identified within the Main group and the Comparison group.
Results. Patients with keratoplasty who received a course of therapeutic plasmapheresis in the perioperative period demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the number of cases of a decrease in the level of C-reactive protein and a statistically significant decrease in the median values of the mean stimulated cytochemical index and the mobilization coefficient. Depending on the risk group for keratoplasty, the patients showed different dynamics of the levels of the studied interleukins after the course of plasmapheresis and keratoplasty. In patients of the Comparison group who did not receive a course of plasmapheresis in the preoperative period, over a period of 1.3 years, 22 cases (24 %) developed graft disease, while patients of both subgroups of the Main group who received a course of therapeutic plasmapheresis in the preoperative period, didn’t demonstrate any cases of graft disease. In patients of the Comparison group (in total for two subgroups), the maximum number of cases of graft disease (n = 24) was observed in the first 500 days after surgery. At the same time, the patients of the Main group who underwent plasmapheresis had the best graft survival rates: during the observation period, there were no cases of graft disease (in both subgroups).
Conclusion: the obtained data indicate the ability of plasmapheresis, performed in the perioperative period, to prevent the development of graft disease in patients with keratoplasty.
About the Authors
S. N. SakhnovRussian Federation
Sakhnov Sergey N., PhD, PhD (Biology), docent, director, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, RAEN academician
Krasnykh Partizan str., 6, Krasnodar, 350012; Mitrofan Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
V. V. Myasnikova
Russian Federation
Myasnikova Viktoriya V., MD, associate professor, deputy director for research, Associate Professor of the depart‑
ment of anesthesiology, reanimatology and transfusiology
Krasnykh Partizan str., 6, Krasnodar, 350012; Mitrofan Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
K. I. Melkonyan
Russian Federation
Melkonyan Karina I., PhD, head of the central research laboratory
Mitrofan Sedina str., 4, Krasnodar, 350063
S. V. Kravchenko
Russian Federation
Kravchenko Sergei V., PhD, research officer
Krasnykh Partizan str., 6, Krasnodar, 350012
References
1. Bai J., Fu H., Bazinet L., Birsner A.E., D’amato R.J. A method for developing novel 3D cornea-on-a-chip using primary murine corneal epithelial and endothelial cells. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020;11:453. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00453
2. Zhang B., Xue Q., Li J., Ma L., Yao Y., Ye H., Cui Z., Yang H. 3D bioprinting for artificial cornea: Challenges and perspectives. Medical engineering & physics. 2019;71:68–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.05.002
3. Sakhnov S.N., Myasnikova V.V., Romanov A.V., Kravchenko S.V. Prospects of using plasmapheresis for preventing the transplantat rejection. Modern Problems of Science and Education = Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2021;3: (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17513/spno.30806
4. Hori J., Yamaguchi T., Keino H., Hamrah P., Maruyama K. Immune privilege in corneal transplantation. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2019;72:100758. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.04.002
5. Батурина Г.С., Каткова Л.Е., Соленов Е.И., Искаков И.А. Восстановление функции эндотелия роговицы глаза (обзор литературы). Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2019;39(3):28–34. DOI: 10.15372/SSMJ20190304
6. Inoue K., Tsuru T. ABO antigen blood-group compatibility and allograft rejection in corneal transplantation. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1999;77(5):495– 499. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770501.x
7. Trufanov S.V., Subbot A.M., Malozhen S.A., Salovarova E.P., Krakhmaleva D.A. Risk factors, clinical presentations, prevention, and treatment of corneal graft rejection. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2016;132(6):108–116 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/ oftalma20161326108-116
8. Sakhnov S.N., Myasnikova V.V., Martsinkevich A.O., Melkonyan K.I., Rusinova T.V., Yutskevich Ya.A. Prognostic and preventive role of various factors in corneal rejection after keratoplasty. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery = Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2021;1:82–87 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25276/0235-41602021-1-82-87
9. Xie P., Tao M., Peng K., Zhao H., Zhang K., Sheng Y., Ankawi G., Ronco C. Plasmapheresis therapy in kidney transplant rejection. Blood purification. 2019;47(1– 3):73–84. DOI: 10.1159/000493521
10. Lee H.J., Shin K.H., Jo S.Y., Kim H.H. Transfusion and Plasmapheresis in Heart and Lung Transplantation in Korea. The Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion. 2021;32(2):129–131. DOI: 10.17945/kjbt.2021.32.2.129
11. Brar H.S., Dadlani A., Ng A.M. Successful High-Volume Plasmapheresis in Acute Liver Failure. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16143. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16143
12. Pranathi B., Nooreen N., Gadde M., Videkar A. Role of plasmapheresis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. J. Med. Sci. Res. 2019;7(4):115–119. DOI: 10.17727/ jmsr.2019/7-20
13. Gulieva M.G. Efferent therapy — plasmapheresis (literature review). Azerbaijan Journal of Ophthalmology 2020;34(3):89–104 (In Russ.).
14. Merz T., Marchesoni I., Caminiti G., Romanelli F. Efficacy of plasmapheresis as treatment for bilateral hyperviscosity syndrome related retinopathy in multiple myeloma. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021:1120672121997069. DOI: 10.1177/1120672121997069
15. Nesterova I.V., Chudilova G.A., Kovaleva S.V., Tarakanov V.A., Lomtatidze L.V., Kolesnikova N.V., Rusinova T.V., Evlevsky A.A., Malinovskaya V.V. Neutrophilic granulocytes: a reflection in the mirror of modern ideas. UK, USA, Moscow: Capricorn Publishing; 2018. 338 p. (In Russ.).
16. Barraquer R.I., Pareja-Aricò L., Gómez-Benlloch A., Michael R. Risk factors for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Medicine. 2019;98(17):e15274. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015274
17. Utkina E.A., Afanasyeva O.I., Pokrovsky S.N. C-reactive protein: pathogenetic characteristics and possible therapeutic target. Russian Journal of Cardiology = Rossiyskiy kardiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021;26(6):4138 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4138
18. Polevshchikov A.V., Nazarov P.G. Immunology of acute phase proteins of inflammation and work of R.V. Petrov. Immunology = Immunologiya. 2020;41(2):167–173 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33029/0206-4952-2020-41-2-167-173
Review
For citations:
Sakhnov S.N., Myasnikova V.V., Melkonyan K.I., Kravchenko S.V. To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Plasmapheresis as a Method for the Graft Disease Prevention in Patients with Keratoplasty. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(4):946-954. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-946-954