Assessment side light effects in patients after implantation of different models IOL
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2012-4-36-38
Abstract
Purpose: to evaluate the side effects of light in patients after implantation of IOLs of different models.
Methods: the study involved 192 patients (216 eyes) operated for cataract (3 groups of patients). the average age of patients was 63±0.78 years. Follow-up was 12 months. the first group included 63 patients (72 eyes) after cataract extraction and implantation of the national refractive-diffractive trifocal IOL MIOL-Record 3. the second group included 64 patients (70 eyes) after cataract extraction and implantation of domestic bifocal IOL refractive-diffractive MIOL-Acсord. the third group consisted of 65 patients (74 eyes) after cataract extraction and IOL implantation domestic monofocal MIOL-2. the postoperative questionnaire (using a detailed oral interview) was conducted after 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. the patient is asked about the presence of these light effects: flashes of light, circles of light scatter at the sight of the light source, flash, glitter, glimmer, blindingly bright light.
Results: At 2.77% (2 patients) of cases in patients with MIOL-Record 3 in a detailed survey in the postoperative period revealed light effects. In patients with MIOL-Accord and MIOL-2 light effects were 2.85% (2 patients) and 1.35% (1 patient). the difference between the groups was not statistically reliable.
Conclusion: this study found no statistically significant increase of side light effects in patients with multifocal IOLs compared
with monofocal IOLs.
About the Authors
A. D. ChuprovRussian Federation
K. C. Ivonin
Russian Federation
A. A. Zamirov
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Kudryavtseva
Russian Federation
References
1. Kohnen T., Kook D., Auffarth G. U., et al. Use of multifocal intraocular lens- es and criteria for patient selection // Ophthalmologe. — 2008. — Vol.105. — P. 527‐532.
2. Hütz W. W., Jäckel R., Hoffman P. C. Comparison of visual performance of silicone and acrylic multifocal IOLs utilizing the same diffractive design // Acta Oph- thalmologica. — 2010. — Vol. 17. — P. 857‐861.
3. Lane S. S., Javitt J. C., Nethery D. A., et al. Improvements in patient‐reported out-
4. comes and visual acuity after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with + 3.0 diopter addition: multicenter clinical trial // J. Cataract Refract. Surg. — 2010. — Vol. 36. — P. 1887‐1896.
5. Wang W. Y., Wang J., Zhang J. et al. Clinical observation on visual quality in pa- tients implanted with monofocal and multifocal aspheric intraocular lenses // Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. — 2010. — Vol. 46. — P. 686‐690.
Review
For citations:
Chuprov A.D., Ivonin K.C., Zamirov A.A., Kudryavtseva Yu.V. Assessment side light effects in patients after implantation of different models IOL. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2012;9(4):36-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2012-4-36-38