VISUAL ACUITY AND CLINICAL REFRACTION FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF VARIOUS MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2015-2-37-42
Abstract
Aim. To analyze visual acuity, clinical refraction, and defocusing tolerance after the implantation of monofocal IOL with rotational asymmetric optic (Lentis Mplus 313 MF) compared with Acrysof ReSTOR SN6AD1.
Materials and methods. Phacoemulsification was performed in a total of 194 patients (288 eyes), i.e., 144 patients (188 eyes) with cataract and 50 patients (100 eyes) with presbyopia and high ametropia. The patients were divided into two groups. Study group included 132 patients (194 eyes) implanted with Lentis Mplus while control group included 62 patients (94 eyes) implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR. Uncorrected distance (5 m), intermediate (50‑70 cm), and near (20‑40 cm) visual acuity under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (8 cd/m2) conditions were measured, objective and subjective refractometry were performed, and defocusing tolerance was evaluated.
Results. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance and near visual acuity was high while intermediate visual acuity was moderately low. Lentis Mplus patients had better near and intermediate visual acuity under mesopic conditions as compared with Acrysof ReSTOR patients. Emmetropia (target refraction) was achieved in 90.2% of study group patients and in 87.2% of control group patients. In patients implanted with Lentis Mplus, refraction was measured by subjective method. Optimal A-constant for Lentis Mplus and Acrysof ReSTOR was 118.0 and 118.6, respectively. Under defocusing, Lentis Mplus patients had better visual acuity than Acrysof ReSTOR patients. This indirectly confirms better intermediate vision.
Conclusions. Lentis Mplus provides better vision at various distances that does not almost depend on light levels and induces minimal dysphotopsia.
About the Authors
N. N. TemirovRussian Federation
Contact information : Temirov Nikolay Nikolaevich, temirov.n@gmail.com
N. E. Temirov
Russian Federation
References
1. Rudakova T.E. [Intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction. Accommodation of pseudophakic eye and its assessment]. Intraokulyarnye linzy dlya korrektsii presbiopii. Osobennosti akkomodatsii glaza s artifakiey i sposoby ee opredeleniya. [Refractive Surgery & Ophthalmology]. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya i oftal’mologiya 2004; 4 (2): 47 52. (in Russ.).
2. Bellucci R. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2005; 16 (1): 33 37.
3. Malyugin B.E. [Cataract surgery and intraocular correction of aphakia: advances, problems, and perspectives]. Khirurgiya katarakty i intraokulyarnaya korrektsiya afakii: dostizheniya, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya. [Annals of Ophthalmology]. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2006; 122 (1): 37 41. (in Russ.).
4. Pepose J.S., Qazi M.A., Davis J., Doane J.F., Loden J.C., Sivalingham V., Mahmoud A.M. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vis combination Crystalens, ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am.J. Ophthalmol. 2007; 144 (3): 347 357.
5. Takhtaev Yu.V., Balashevich L.I. [Surgical correction of hyperopia and presbyopia with pseudoaccomodative lenses AcrySof ReSTOR]. Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya gipermetropii i presbiopii refraktsionno-difraktsionnym psevdoakkomodiruyushchimi linzami AcrySof ReSTOR. [Ophthalmosurgery]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2005; 3: 12 16. (in Russ.).
6. Chiam P.J., Chan J.H., Aggarwal R.K., Kasaby S. ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: quality of vision. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2006; 32 (9): 1459 1463.
7. Takhchidi Kh.P., Iskakov I.A., Pichikova N.A. [Comparative assessment of the outcomes of bifocal diffractive-refractive and monofocal intraocular lens implantation]. Sravnitel’naya otsenka rezul’tatov implantatsii bifokal’nykh difraktsionnorefraktsionnykh i monofokal’nykh intraokulyarnykh linz. [Ophthalmosurgery]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2009; 1: 18 20. (in Russ.).
8. Fedorova I.S., Kopaev S.Yu., Kuznetsova T.S., Uzunyan D.G. [Intraocular correction of high ametropia with individual multifocal IOLs]. Intraokulyarnaya korrektsiya ametropiy kraynikh stepeney c primeneniem individual’nykh mul’tifokal’nykh IOL LentisMplus. [Ophthalmosurgery]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2013; 3: 46 51. (in Russ.).
9. Temirov N.E., Korkhov E.A. [Clinical outcomes of aphakia correction with various models of multifocal IOLs]. Klinicheskie rezul’taty korrektsii afakii razlichnymi tipami mul’tifokal’nykh IOL. [Ophthalmology]. Oftal’mologiya. 2010; 1: 8 13. (in Russ.).
10. Auffarth G.U. Intraocular lens Lentis Mplus et Lentis Mplus toric. Cataract Refract. Surg. Today Europe. 2012: 1 15.
11. Alio J.L., Plaza-Puche A.B., Picero D.P., Javaloy J., Ayala M.J. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with 2 multifocal intraocular lens models with rotational asymmetry. J. Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37 (9): 1605 1614.
12. Granberg A. Intraocular lens Lentis Mplus et Lentis Mplus toric. Cataract Refract. Surg. Today Europe. 2012, Jan;1 15.
13. Zaldivar R., Shultz M.C., Davidorf J.M., Holladay J.T. Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with extreme myopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2000; 26 (5): 668 674.
14. Bessarabov A.N., Panteleev E.N. [Adaptive IOL power calculations for refractive lensectomy (Part I)]. Adaptivnyy raschet opticheskoy sily IOL dlya refraktsionnoy lensektomii (I chast’). [Ophthalmosurgery]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2000; 4: 46 57. (in Russ.).
15. Bessarabov A.N., Panteleev E.N. [Adaptive IOL power calculations for refractive lensectomy (Part II)]. Adaptivnyy raschet opticheskoy sily IOL dlya refraktsionnoy lensektomii (I chast’). [Ophthalmosurgery]. Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2001; 1: 40 50. (in Russ.).
16. Ivanov M.N., Bocharov V.E., Mamikonyan V.R., Shevelev A.Yu., Gantsovskiy P.I. [Comparative study of modern IOL power calculation formulas]. Sravnitel’noe izuchenie sovremennykh formul rascheta opticheskoy sily IOL. [Refractive Surgery & Ophthalmology]. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya i oftal’mologiya. 2003; 3 (2): 10 14. (in Russ.).
17. Avetisov S.E., Mamikonyan V.R., Kas’yanov A. A., Shirshikov Yu.K., Ryzhkova E.G. [Retrospective study of IOL power calculation formula accuracy, evaluation of A constant calculation efficacy]. Retrospektivnyy analiz tochnosti razlichnykh formul rascheta opticheskoy sily IOL, otsenka effektivnosti rascheta personifitsirovannoy konstanty. [Refractive Surgery & Ophthalmology]. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya i oftal’mologiya. 2003; 3 (4): 21 27. (in Russ.).
18. Ivanov M.N., Shevelev A.Yu., [Intraocular lens power calculation formula]. Formula rascheta opticheskoy sily intraokulyarnykh linz. [Annals of Ophthalmology]. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2003; 119 (4): 52 54. (in Russ.).
19. Kas’yanov A. A. [Analysis of IOL power calculation techniques]. Analiz metodov rascheta opticheskoy sily IOL. [Refractive Surgery & Ophthalmology]. Refraktsionnaya khirurgiya i oftal’mologiya. 2004; 4 (1): 61 65. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Temirov N.N., Temirov N.E. VISUAL ACUITY AND CLINICAL REFRACTION FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION OF VARIOUS MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2015;12(2):37-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2015-2-37-42