Optimization of the Lens Nucleus Fragmentation Pattern During Hybrid Phacoemulsification with Different Cataract Densities

Purpose: comparative study of the energy and hydrodynamic parameters of phacoemulsification using different patterns of femtosecond laser fragmentation of the lens nucleus in patients with grade III and IV cataracts.

Patients and methods. Femtosecond laser (hybrid) phacoemulsification was performed in 252 patients (252 eyes) with grade III cataracts (group 1), and 237 patients (237 eyes) with grade IV cataracts according to the Buratto classification (group 2). In subgroup 1A, the pizza pattern (10 radial incisions) was used for femtosecond laser fragmentation of the nucleus. In subgroup 1B — the cylinder pattern (a combination of 8 radial incisions with 5 circular incisions), and in subgroup 1C — the grid pattern (8 radial incisions in combination with multiple incisions in the central zone in the form of a grid with a cell of 0.5 mm). In subgroup 2A, the pizza pattern was used for femtosecond laser fragmentation of the nucleus, in subgroup 2B — the cylinder pattern, and in subgroup 2C — the mesh pattern. Anterior capsulorhexis and preliminary fragmentation of the lens nucleus were performed using the VICTUS femtosecond laser surgical system. The effective ultrasound time and volume of the irrigation solution consumed at the stage of emulsification of the nuclear fragments were calculated. Corneal endothelial cell loss was assessed in 3 months after the surgery.

Results. In group 1, the shortest effective ultrasound time was revealed if the mesh pattern 1.65 ± 0.69 s, it was significantly less than the cylinder pattern — 2.33 ± 0.72 s (p < 0.05) and the pizza pattern — 3.18 ± 0.83 (p < 0.01). In group 2, the shortest effective ultrasound time was revealed when using the “grid” pattern 3.96 ± 0.81 s, it was significantly less than the “cylinders” pattern — 4.93 ± 0.93 s (p < 0.05) and the “pizza” pattern — 6.17 ± 1.13 s (p < 0.05). In group 1, the volume of irrigation solution consumed during emulsification of nuclear fragments was significantly less when using the “grid” pattern — 20.3 ± 3.0 ml compared to the “cylinders” patterns — 30.4 ± 5.6 (p < 0.05) and the “pizza” pattern 38.2 ± 7.8 ml (p < 0.01). In group 2, the volume of irrigation solution consumed during emulsification of nuclear fragments was significantly less when using the “mesh” pattern — 39.0 ± 7.9 ml compared to the “cylinder” patterns — 57.5 ± 10.0 ml (p < 0.05) and the “pizza” pattern — 77.0 ± 12.9 ml (p < 0.01). In group 1, after using the “mesh” pattern, the loss of corneal endothelial cells was 3.36 ± 0.93 %, which was significantly less compared to the “cylinder” pattern — 5.04 ± 1.21 % (p < 0.05) and the “pizza” pattern — 6.93 ± 1.53 % (p < 0.05). In group 2, after using the “grid” pattern, the loss of corneal endothelial cells was 8.61 ± 1.65 %, it is significantly less compared to the “cylinders” pattern — 9.83 ± 1.73 % (p < 0.05) and the “pizza” pattern — 11.52 ± 1.91% (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. The “grid” pattern allows to minimize the effective ultrasound time, the volume of the spent irrigation solution and, as a consequence, the loss of corneal endothelial cells compared to other patterns of femtosecond laser fragmentation

1. Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J. Refract. Surg. 2009;25(12):1053–1060. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04.

2. Anisimova SYu, Anisimov SI, Trubilin VN, Novak IV. Femtolaserassisted phacoemulsification. The first domestic experience. Cataractal and Refractive Surgery. 2012;12(3):7–10 (In Russ.).

3. Анисимова СЮ, Трубилин ВН, Трубилин АВ, Анисимов СИ. Сравнение механического и фемтосекундного капсулорексиса при факоэмульсификации катаракты. Катарактальная и рефракционная хирургия. 2012;12(4):16–18. Anisimova SYu, Trubikin VN, Trubilin AV, Anisimov SI. Compare mechanical and femtosecond capsulorhexis in phacoemulsification. Cataractal and Refractive Surgery. 2012;12(4):16–18 (In Russ.).

4. Avetisov SE, Mamikonyan VR, Yusef YuN, Yusef SN, Ivanov MN, Avetisov KS. Hybrid phacoemulsification: a new stage in the improvement of cataract surgery. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2014;130(2):4–7 (In Russ.).

5. Kecik M, Schweitzer C. Femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery: Update and perspectives Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1131314. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1131314.

6. Fine H, Packer M, Hoffman R. New phacoemulsification technologies. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2002;28:1054–1060. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01399-8.

7. Fine H, Packeer M, Hoffman R. Power modulations in new phacoemulsification technologies: Improved outcomes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2004;30(5):1014–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.09.062.

8. Malyugin BE. Stateoftheart cataract surgery and intraocular optical correction. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2014;130(6):80–88 (In Russ.).

9. DickHB, SchultzT. AReviewof LaserAssisted VersusTraditional. Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6:7–18. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0080-z.

10. Assaf A, Aly M, Zaki R, Shaaban Y, Aziz B. Femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery in soft and hard nuclear cataracts: a comparison of effective phacoemulsification time. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:1095–1100. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S300145.

11. Chen X, Yu Y, Zhu Y, Wang W, Yao Y. Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laserassisted cataractsurgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2017;43(4):486–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.010.

12. Schroeter A, Kropp M, Cvejic Z, Thumann G, Pajic B. Comparison of femtosecond laserassisted and ultrasoundassisted cataract surgery with focus on endothelial analysis. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(3):996. doi: 10.3390/s21030996.

13. Whang WJ, Yung HJ, Lee SH, Koo M, Oh HY, Yoo YS, Joo CK. Effect of pre fragmentation on efficacy and safety for phacoemulsification in femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery: a nonrandomized clinical trial. Ann Transl Med. 2023;11(1):5. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1279.

14. Kaur M, Titiyal JS, Surve A, Verma R. Effect of Lens Fragmentation Patterns on Phacoemulsification Parameters and Postoperative Inflammation in Femtosecond LaserAssisted Cataract Surgery. Current Eye Research. 2018;43(10):1228– 1232. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1485951.

15. Leda R, Machado D, Hida W, Motta A, Pacini T, Amorim R. Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1709–1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717.

16. Nagy Z. Femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery: facts and results. NewJersey: SLACK Incorporated, 2014.

17. Avetisov KS. Differentiated approach to hybrid phacoemulsification in small pupil. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2015;131(3):61–63 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma201513136161-63.

18. Yusef SN. Modified technique of hybrid phacoemulsification. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2015;131(3):56–60 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2015131356-60.

19. Huseynova T, Mita M, Corpuz C, Sotoyama Y, Tomita M. Evaluating the different laser fragmentation patterns used in laser cataract surgeries in terms of effective phacoemulsication time and power. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:2067–2071. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S64611.