Evaluation of the Method for Analyzing the Quality of Patients’ Vision for Decision-making on Initial Cataract Surgery with High Visual Acuity
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-2-289-294
Abstract
The purpose: to evaluate the results of applying the method to determine indications for surgery of initial cataracts with high visual acuity based on a correlation analysis of the relationship between higher order aberrations and subjective quality of vision.
Patients and methods. 243 patients (243 eyes) were examined at the JSC “Ekaterinburg Center of the Scientific and Technical Complex “Microsurgery of the Eye”. Patients were divided into groups by the type of cataract: patients with cortical cataract — 79 eyes, with nuclear cataract — 89 eyes, with posterior subcapsular cataract — 75 eyes. The age in the group ranged from 42 to 85 years, 103 men (42 %), 140 women (48 %). Determination of wavefront aberrations was performed on an aberrometer operating on the principle of ray tracing. Internal aberrations were assessed with drug-induced mydriasis, pupil diameter of 5 mm. The degree of visual impairment in patients with initial cataract and high visual acuity was determined based on objective and subjective assessment.
Results. The correlation between the values of higher order internal aberrations (coma, trefoil, spherical aberration) and the data of the developed questionnaire was determined.
Conclusions. Different types of initial lens opacities can create a unique set of aberrations and change the quality of vision. These changes can be assessed using modern imaging techniques and questionnaires, which helps in diagnosis and decision-making on surgical treatmentю
About the Authors
D. I. IvanovRussian Federation
Ivanov Dmitry I. PhD, MD, head of the II Surgical Department, Ophthalmic Surgeon
Bardina str., 4a, Ekaterinburg, 620149
E. M. Titarenko
Russian Federation
Titarenko Elena M. head of the Residency Department, ophthalmologist
Bardina str., 4a, Ekaterinburg, 620149
References
1. Koroleva IA, Egorov EA. Age‑related cataract: prevention and treatment. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2018;4:194–198 (In Russ.).
2. Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness challenges for the 21st century. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):249–256.
3. Yuzhakov AM. Main directions in the elimination of avoidable blindness in the Russian Federation. Elimination of avoidable blindness: WHO global initiative. Materials of the Russian interregional symposium. Moscow, 2003:27–31 (In Russ.).
4. Orlova OM, Trubilin VN. Cataract surgery as a medical and social problem. Sociology of Medicine. 2017;116(2):119–122 (In Russ.).
5. Liu X, Guan Z, Liang S, Feng S, Zhou Y. Associations of cataract, cataract surgery with dementia risk: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of 448,140 participants. Eur J Clin Invest. 2024 Feb;54(2):e14113. doi: 10.1111/eci.14113.
6. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study., GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by cataract: a meta‑analysis from 2000 to 2020. Eye 2024;38:2156–2172. doi: 10.1038/s41433‑024‑02961‑1.
7. Amesbury EC, Grossberg AL, Hong DM, Miller KM. Functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with 20/20 or better preoperative visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1505–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.031.
8. Zhu X, Ye H, He W, Yang J, Dai J, Lu Y. Objective functional visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with good preoperative visual acuity. Eye (Lond). 2017 Mar;31(3):452–459. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.239.
9. Mishor, G. Higher order aberrations and age‑related cataract: a pre‑ and post‑ operative study. Thesis, Cardiff University, 2012.
10. Faria‑Correia F, Lopes B, Monteiro T, Franqueira N, Ambrósio R Jr. Scheimpflug lens densitometry and ocular wavefront aberrations in patients with mild nuclear cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):405–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.069.
11. Lee J, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Higher‑order aberrations induced by nuclear cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2104–2109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.029. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):4.
12. Sachdev N, Ormonde SE, Sherwin T, McGhee CN. Higher‑order aberrations of lenticular opacities. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Aug;30(8):1642–1648. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.048.
13. Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function. Ophthalmology. 2009 Aug;116(8):1436–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Jun 4. PMID: 19500847.
14. Rocha KM, Nosé W, Bottós K, Bottós J, Morimoto L, Soriano E. Higher‑order aberrations of age‑related cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Aug;33(8):1442–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.059.
15. Fernández J, Rodríguez‑Vallejo M, Martínez J, Tauste A, Piñero DP. From Presbyopia to Cataracts: A Critical Review on Dysfunctional Lens Syndrome. J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 27:4318405. doi: 10.1155/2018/4318405.
16. Owsley C. Vision and Aging. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:255–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev‑vision‑111815‑114550.
Review
For citations:
Ivanov D.I., Titarenko E.M. Evaluation of the Method for Analyzing the Quality of Patients’ Vision for Decision-making on Initial Cataract Surgery with High Visual Acuity. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(2):289-294. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-2-289-294