Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Possibilities of Modern Imaging Methods in Epibulbar Lesions Diagnostics

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-2-333-338

Abstract

Aim of the study: to study the informativeness of new modes of standardized A-echography in the diagnosis of retinal detachment, vitreous adhesions, and retinoschisis.

Patients and methods. The study included 180 patients (180 eyes) with vitreoretinal pathology aged 40 to 78 years (mean age 62 ± 6.2 years): 70 patients (70 eyes) with local retinal detachment (RD), 70 patients (70 eyes) with vitreous adhesions, and 40 patients (40 eyes) with retinoschisis (RS). All patients underwent a comprehensive ultrasound examination, including B-echography and standardized A-echography in the modes of quantitative evaluation of echo signals Retina I (evaluation of the number of echo signal microoscillations) and Retina QII (evaluation of the difference in reflectivity (DR) in comparison with the sclera).

Results. According to B-echography, RD was diagnosed in 66 patients (94.29 %), vitreous adhesions — in 63 cases (90 %), retinoschisis — in 36 patients (90 %), in 15 patients (25 %) the assessment of the detected pathological intraocular abnormalities was complicated due to the similarity of the echographic image. According to standardized A-echography, RD was recorded in 65 cases (92.86 %). The results of the echo signal microoscillations assessment in the Retina A1 mode corresponded to “R++” and “R+++”, the DR in the Retina QII mode corresponded to 10.56 ± 3.18 dB. Vitreous adhesions were recorded in 63 cases (90 %). In the Retina A1 mode, the indicators corresponded to “M++” and “M+++”, the DR was 25.45 ± 5.56 dB (Retina QII mode). In patients with RD in the Retina A1 mode, the values  corresponded to “R++” and “R+++” in 32 patients (80 %) and “M++” in 8 patients (20 %), the DR in the Retina QII mode was 21.44 ± 6.78 dB. When comparing the DR values  (Retina QII mode) in the groups with RD and vitreous adhesions, the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The difference in the DR values  in the RD group was significant when compared with patients with vitreous adhesions (p < 0.05) and insignificant when compared with patients with RD (p > 0.05).

Conclusion. New modes of standardized A-echography in combination with traditional B-echography makes it possible to significantly increase the informative value of ultrasound diagnostics of RD, vitreous adhesions and retinoschisis.

About the Authors

T. N. Kiseleva
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Kiseleva Tatiana N. PhD, MD, Professor, head of Ultrasound Diagnostic Department

Sadovaja-Chernogrjazskaja str., 14/19, Moscow, 105062



A. N. Bedretdinov
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Bedretdinov Aleksei N. PhD, researcher of Ultrasound Diagnostic Department

Sadovaja-Chernogrjazskaja str., 14/19, Moscow, 105062



A. L. Batalova
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Batalova Aset L. postgraduate

Sadovaja-Chernogrjazskaja str., 14/19, Moscow, 105062



N. I. Ovechkin
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Ovechkin Nicolay I. PhD, head of Operating unit

Sadovaja-Chernogrjazskaja str., 14/19, Moscow, 105062



References

1. Neroev VV. Ophthalmology: clinical recommendations. Moscow: GEOTAR‑Media; 2020 (In Russ.).

2. Osmanov RE Modern methods of surgical treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Tambov University Reports Series “Natural and technical sciences”. 2015;20(3):658–662 (In Russ.).

3. Brinton DA, Wilkinson CP. Retinal detachment — Principles and practice. Oxford: University Press. Inc., 2009. P. 109–115.

4. Kwon OW, Song JH, Roh MI. Retinal Detachment and Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2016;55:154–162. doi: 10.1159/000438972.

5. Kiseleva TN, Lugovkina KV, Bedretdinov AN. High‑frequency echography of the eye in macular hole diagnosis. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2022;15(3):34– 39 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072‑0076‑2022‑15‑3‑34‑39.

6. Ultrasound examinations in ophthalmology: Manual for physicians. 1st ed. Eds VV Neroev, TN Kiseleva. Moscow: Ikar Publishing House, 2019 (In Russ.).

7. Vrablik ME, Snead GR, Minnigan HJ, Kirschner JM, Emmett TW, Seupaul RA. The diagnostic accuracy of bedside ocular ultrasonography for the diagnosis of retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta‑analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):199–203.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.020.

8. Almendárez JE, Vargas DM, González C, Takane M, Koga W. Ultrasound findings in ocular trauma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015 Dec;90(12):572–577. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2015.07.010.

9. Ossoinig KC. Standardized Ophthalmic Echography of the Eye, Orbit, and Periorbital Region. A Comprehensive Slide Set and Study Guide. 3rd ed. Goodfellow, Iowa City.1985;12.

10. Fonkeu Y, Singh N, Hayden‑Loreck B, Singh AD. Diagnostic A‑Scan of Choroidal Melanoma: Automated Quantification of Parameters. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2019 Aug;5(5):350–357. doi: 10.1159/000496345.

11. Genovesi‑Ebert F, Rizzo S, Chiellini S, Di bartolo E, Marabotti A, Nardi M. Reliability of standardized echography before vitreoretinal surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 1998;212 Suppl 1:91–92. doi: 10.1159/000055438.

12. Kim RS, Jain RR, Brown DM, Bretana ME, Kegley EN, Singer MA, Aragon AV, Schefler AC. Elevated Choroidal Thickness and Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in the Fellow Eyes of Patients with Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2018 Nov;4(6):375–380. doi: 10.1159/000486864.

13. Cennamo G, Montorio D, Breve MA, Brescia Morra V, Menna F, Cennamo G. Evaluation of optic nerve subarachnoid space in primary open angle glaucoma using ultrasound examination. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0208064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208064.

14. Gottlieb M, Holladay D, Peksa GD. Point‑of‑Care Ocular Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta‑Analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(8):931–939. doi: 10.1111/acem.13682.

15. Kachan TV, Skrypnik OV, Marchenko LN, Dalidovich AA. Features of differential diagnostics and treatment of peripheral retinal tears and retinal detachments. Ophthalmology. Eastern Europe. 2022;12(1):68–78 (In Russ.). doi: 10.34883/PI.2022.12.1.023.

16. Lorenzo‑Carrero J, Perez‑Flores I, Cid‑Galano M. B‑scan ultrasonography to screen for retinal tears in acute symptomatic age‑related posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(1):94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.040.

17. Volodin PL, Belyanina SI Acute posterior vitreous detachment. Clinical ophthalmology. 2022;22(4):247–253 (In Russ.). doi: 10.32364/23117729‑2022‑22‑4247‑25.

18. Kicova N, Bertelmann T, Irle S. Evaluation of a posterior vitreous detachment: a comparison of biomicroscopy, B‑scan ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography to surgical findings with chromodissection. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(4):264–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑3768.2011.02330.


Review

For citations:


Kiseleva T.N., Bedretdinov A.N., Batalova A.L., Ovechkin N.I. Possibilities of Modern Imaging Methods in Epibulbar Lesions Diagnostics. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(2):333-338. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-2-333-338

Views: 72


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)