Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Medication Treatment for Presbyopia, Practical Experience

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-664-668

Abstract

Relevance. Presbyopia is a decrease in the amplitude of accommodation, when it can no longer provide comfortable work at the required working distance. In the context of progressive aging of the population, uncorrected presbyopia leads to economic losses due to decreased labor productivity. The pathogenesis of presbyopia is associated with an increase in the thickness and density of the lens, the accumulation of cross-links between crystallin proteins and a decrease in the elasticity of the capsule, which leads to a loss of the ability of the lens to change shape to provide accommodation. Pharmacological treatment of presbyopia can be an alternative for those who want a scenario without glasses and surgery. There are two main pharmacological strategies for correcting presbyopia: increasing the depth of focus (myoptics) and increasing the amplitude of accommodation (drugs that preserve the elasticity of the lens). One of the drugs that can affect the preservation of the elasticity of the lens is pirenoxine. Purpose: to gain experience in using Pirenoxine (Catalin) to prevent the development and progression of presbyopia. Materials and methods: An experimental group of 20 patients (14 women and 6 men) was recruited, to whom Catalin was prescribed according to the scheme: 4–5 times a day. The average age of the subjects was 45.4 years. The amplitude of absolute accommodation was determined; the reserve of relative accommodation was determined and addition was determined in two ways. A repeat study was conducted 8 months after the start of treatment. Results. As a result of the study, the volume and reserve of accommodation did not decrease, as did the amount of addition. The data obtained are comparable with the results of other similar studies. It can be assumed that against the background of the use of pirenoxine, the elastic properties of the lens and accommodative capabilities are preserved in the studied age group. Conclusion. A pharmacological strategy for the treatment and prevention of presbyopia aimed at maintaining the elasticity of the lens by instilling drops of pirenoxine is safe and promising.

About the Authors

M. A. Sushkova
“Viveya” Consultative and Diagnostic Center
Russian Federation

Maria A. Sushkova - ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category.

Zaparina str., 83, Khabarovsk, 680000



I. A. Chernatova
“Viveya” Consultative and Diagnostic Center
Russian Federation

Inessa A. Chernatova - head of the Ophthalmology department.

Zaparina str., 83, Khabarovsk, 680000



O. G. Badaeva
“Viveya” Consultative and Diagnostic Center
Russian Federation

Oksana G. Badaeva - ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category.

Zaparina str., 83, Khabarovsk, 680000



References

1. Rinskaya NV. Optometrist’s Handbook. Algorithm for Selecting Refraction: A Tutorial. Moscow: FARB-IT, 2018. (In Russ.).

2. Borisov FG, Loskutov IA. Age-related changes in the lens: diagnostics and treatment. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2024;20(47):32–35 (In Russ.).

3. Frick KD, Joy SM, Wilson DA, Naidoo KS, Holden BA. The Global Burden of Potential Productivity Loss from Uncorrected Presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug; 122(8):1706-10.

4. Fursova AZh, Loskutov IA, Borisov FG. Dysfunctional changes in the lens in real clinical practice. Ophthalmology. 2024;21(3):617–622 (In Russ.).

5. Agaeva TS. On the pathogenesis of cataract. Russian Children’s Ophthalmology 2012;1–2:61–63 (In Russ.).

6. Polunin GS, Makarov IA, Bubnova IA. Study of the therapeutic efficacy of Catalin in age-related cataract (observation period of 1 year). RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2012;13(3):110–114 (In Russ.).

7. Mishchenko OP, Yuryeva TN, Rozanova OI, Senchenko NYa, Shchuko AG. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of presbyopia correction using various intraocular optical systems: monovision, accommodating and multifocal. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2014;3:… (In Russ.). https://eyepress.ru/article/sravnitelnyy-analiz-effektivnosti-korrektsii-presbiopii-pri-pomoshchi-razlichny

8. Upaphong P, Thonusin C, Choovuthayakorn J, Chattipakorn N, Chattipakorn SC. The possible positive mechanisms of pirenoxine in cataract formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(16):9431. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169431.

9. Tsuneyoshi Y, Higuchi A, Negishi K, Tsubota K. Suppression of presbyopia progression with pirenoxine eye drops: experiments on rats and nonblinded, randomized clinical trial of efficacy. Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 28;7(1):6819. doi: 10.1038/s41598017072086.

10. Khvatova NV, Slyshalova NN. Available methods for studying accommodation in outpatient ophthalmological settings. The EYE GLAZ. 2019;2:59–68 (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Sushkova M.A., Chernatova I.A., Badaeva O.G. Medication Treatment for Presbyopia, Practical Experience. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):664-668. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-664-668

Views: 16


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)