Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Formulas for Toric IOLs Optical Power Calculating at Lens Surgery in Patients after Penetrating Keratoplasty

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-589-595

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the effectiveness of 9 calculating the IOL optical power formulas for toric monofocal IOL and wavefront formation mechanism IOL at cataract surgical treatment in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Patients and methods. The study included 68 patients (68 eyes) underwent cataract surgery after PK. 32 patients (32 eyes) were implanted with the EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity DFTx15 (group A), and 36 patients (36 eyes) were implanted with the monofocal IOL AcrySof IQ Toric SN6ATx (group B). The average period after the PK procedure in group A was 49.06 ± 18.48 months, in group B — 53.25 ± 17.19 months. The average age was 45.71 ± 13.65 years, 27 men, 41 women. The optical power of the IOL was calculated using the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Haigis, Kane, Barrett Toric Calculator, EVO formulas. The last two formulas were calculated with the predicted (PPC) and measured posterior corneal surface (MPC). Results. The lowest values of the median absolute error (MedAE) were noted for formulas that take into account the measured posterior surface of the cornea — Barrett Toric Calculator (in group A MedAE = 0.778; in group B MedAE = 0.805) and EVO (in group A MedAE = 0.799; in group B MedAE = 0.801). In group A, the highest percentage of hits within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were obtained for the Barrett (MPC) formulas (±0.5 D — 34.4%; ±1.0 D — 59.4%), Kane (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%) and EVO (MPC) (±0.5 D — 31.3%; ±1.0 D — 56.3%); in group B, within ±0.5 D for the Barrett (MPC) (16.7%) and EVO (MPC) (16.7%) formulas, within ±1.0 D for the Barrett (MPC) (41.7%), Kane (38.9%) and EVO (MPC) (38.9%) formulas. Conclusion. Using the posterior corneal surface parameters in the IOL optical power calculating allows more accurate target refraction in patients with PK. The Barrett Toric Calculator and EVO formulas with the introduction of posterior corneal surface parameters can be recommended for use in clinical practice of aphakia surgical correction in patients with previously performed PK.

About the Authors

D. A. Khvan
Pacific State Medical University Ministry; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Khvan - postgraduate of the Otorhinolaryngology Department.

Ostryakova ave., 2, Vladivostok, 690002; Borisenko str, 100e, Vladivostok, 690088



G. A. Fedyashev
Pacific State Medical University Ministry; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Gleb A. Fedyashev - MD, head of the Otorhinolaryngology Department.

Ostryakova ave., 2, Vladivostok, 690002; Borisenko str, 100e, Vladivostok, 690088



M. P. Ruchkin
Pacific State Medical University Ministry; Primorskii Center of Eye Microsurgery
Russian Federation

Micheal P. Ruchkin - PhD, assistant of the Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology Department.

Ostryakova ave., 2, Vladivostok, 690002; Borisenko str, 100e, Vladivostok, 690088



References

1. Feizi S, Zare M. Current approaches for management of postpenetrating keratoplasty astigmatism. J Ophthalmol. 2011;2011:708736. doi: 10.1155/2011/708736.

2. Dietrich T, Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Naumann GO, Seitz B. Treffsicherheit der Kunstlinsenberechnung bei Katarakt-Operation nach perforierender Keratoplastik — retrospektive Studie an 72 Augen [Accuracy of IOL power prediction in cataract surgery after penetrating keratoplasty--retrospective study of 72 eyes]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Aug;228(8):698–703. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245640.

3. Cazabon S, Quah SA, Jones MN, Batterbury M, Kaye SB. Sequential versus combined penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Jul;87(7):482–486. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e1728e.

4. Gruenauer-Kloevekorn C, Kloevekorn-Norgall K, Duncker GI, Habermann A. Refractive error after triple and non-simultaneous procedures: is the application of a standard constant keratometry value in IOL power calculation advisable? Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84(5):679–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00705.x.

5. Pellegrini M, Furiosi L, Salgari N, D’Angelo S, Zauli G, Yu AG, Busin M. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;50(1):17–22. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14026.

6. Özbek Uzman S, Yalnız Akkaya Z, Düzova E, Şingar E, Burcu A. Corneal Pathology and Cataract: Combined Surgery or Sequential Surgery? Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 25;51(1):1–6. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.04382.

7. Cung LX, Hang DTT, Hiep NX, Quyet D, Thai TV, Nga VT, Bac ND, Nguyen DN. Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Outcomes After Penetrating Keratoplasty. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 20;7(24):4301–4305. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.379.

8. Lockington D, Wang EF, Patel DV, Moore SP, McGhee CN. Effectiveness of cataract phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lenses in addressing astigmatism after keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Dec;40(12):2044–2049. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.03.025.

9. Devebacak A, Degirmenci C, Barut Selver O, Palamar M, Egrilmez S. Correction of high astigmatism with toric intraocular lens in eyes with corneal transplant. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 31:11206721221123885. doi: 10.1177/11206721221123885.


Review

For citations:


Khvan D.A., Fedyashev G.A., Ruchkin M.P. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Formulas for Toric IOLs Optical Power Calculating at Lens Surgery in Patients after Penetrating Keratoplasty. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):589-595. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-589-595

Views: 9


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)