Diagnostic Significance of Questionnaires in Patients with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Tearing is a common complaint that reduces the quality of life and can lead to social desadaptation of the patient. To objectively assess the patient’s condition and personalize medical care, it is necessary to take into account the physiological, psychological and social factors that determine the effect of tearing on the quality of life. The tool for such an assessment is a questionnaire. Currently, the most widely used questionnaires for determining the effect of tearing on the patient’s quality of life are the Lac-Q and WEQOL questionnaires. Most often, they are used to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment. However, there is no data related to patient questioning for detection of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Purpose: Determination of the diagnostic significance of questioning patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Material and methods. Two groups of patients (93 people) were interviewed using the Lac-Q and WEQOL questionnaires translated into Russian. The first group consisted of 55 patients with confirmed nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The second group included 38 patients with proper tear drainage. The results of interviewing were analyzed: ROC analysis was carried out to determine the threshold score for predicting nasolacrimal duct obstruction, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaires. In addition, we performed correlation and comparative analysis. Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. Results. Analysis of the obtained results showed that the threshold score for inclusion of the patient in the “nasolacrimal duct obstruction” group for both questionnaires is at least 6 points. The WEQOL questionnaire demonstrated a higher level of correlation between questions and the total score and higher sensitivity and specificity (97.4 % and 98.2 %; AUC = 0.993) compared to the Lac-Q questionnaire (94.7 % and 98.2 %; AUC = 0.921). Conclusion. The Lac-Q and WEQOL questionnaires are admissible to predict the presence of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Development of a more specific and less excessive questionnaire for prediction of nasolacrimal duct obstruction requires further research.

1. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Lawrence MG, Cook EF, Dailey R, Goldman L. Development of the ‘Activities of Daily Vision Scale’. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992 Dec;30(12):1111–1126. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199212000-00004.

2. Boisjoly H, Gresset J, Fontaine N, Charest M, Brunette I, LeFrançois M, Deschênes J, Bazin R, Laughrea PA, Dubé I. The VF-14 index of functional visual impairment in candidates for a corneal graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jul;128(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00071-9.

3. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;119(7):1050–1058. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050.

4. Sheludchenko VM, Osipyan GA, Arestova ON, Djalili RA, Khraystin Kh. Comparative assessment of the quality of life of keratoconus patients before and after intrastromal keratoplasty. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(5):40–46 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma202113705140.

5. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615– 621. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615. PMID: 10815152.

6. Makashova NV, Vasil’eva AE, Kolosova OYu. Effects of artificial tears on ocular surface in glaucomatous patients with long-term instillation of preserved antiglaucoma eye drops. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(2):59–65 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2018134259-65.

7. Mistry N, Rockley TJ, Reynolds T, Hopkins C. Development and validation of a symptom questionnaire for recording outcomes in adult lacrimal surgery. Rhinology. 2011 Dec;49(5):538–545. doi: 10.4193/Rhino11.042.

8. Schulz CB, Rainsbury P, Hoffman JJ, Ah-Kye L, Yang E, Malhotra R, Rogers S, Fayers P, Fayers T. The watery eye quality of life (WEQOL) questionnaire: a patient-reported outcome measure for surgically amenable epiphora. Eye (Lond). 2022 Jul;36(7):1468–1475. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01674-z. Erratum in: Eye (Lond). 2022 Jul;36(7):1521. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01733-5.

9. At’kova EL, Yartsev VD, Krakhovetskiy NN, Root AO, Reznikova LV. First results of balloon dacryoplasty in dacryostenosis. Ophthalmology Reports. 2015;8(2):35–40 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/OV2015235-40.

10. Shkolnik GS, Shkolnik SF. A new method of silicone intubation of the lacrimal pathways. Siberian scientific medical journal. 2019;39(3):90–94 (In Russ.). doi: 10.15372/SSMJ20190314.

11. Sipkova Z, Vonica O, Olurin O, Obi EE, Pearson AR. Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora. Eye (Lond). 2017 Dec;31(12):1664–1671. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.120.

12. Ali MJ, Iram S, Ali MH, Naik MN. Assessing the Outcomes of Powered Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Adults Using the Lacrimal Symptom (Lac-Q) Questionnaire. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jan/Feb;33(1):65–68. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000660.

13. Wong WK, Dean S, Nair S. Comparison between endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy by using the Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire: A pilot study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 Jan 1;32(1):46–51. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2018.32.4494.

14. Purevdorj B, Dugarsuren U, Tuvaan B, Jamiyanjav B. Anatomy of lacrimal sac fossa affecting success rate in endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in Mongolians. Anat Cell Biol. 2021 Dec 31;54(4):441–447. doi: 10.5115/acb.21.081.

15. Pirola F, Spriano G, Ferreli F, Russo E, Di Bari M, Giannitto C, De Virgilio A, Mercante G, Vinciguerra P, Di Maria A, Malvezzi L. Clinical outcome and quality of life of lacrimal sac mucocele treated via endoscopic posterior approach. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jan-Feb;43(1):103244. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103244. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

16. Kaptı HB, Korkmaz H. Evaluation of the efficacy of postoperative triamcinolone in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using lacrimal symptom questionnaire. Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;42(8):2573–2580. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02305-6.

17. Torabi P, Stenstrom B, Larsson AM, Bjornberg P, Svensson C, Engelsberg K. Outcomes of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy according to a modified Lacrimal Symptom Questionnaire (Lac-Q). Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2023 Dec 31;12(2):55–61. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1470.

18. Gupta S, Ali MJ, Ali MH, Naik MN. Assessing the outcomes of mini-Monoka stent dilatation for primary punctal stenosis using the lacrimal symptom questionnaire. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):269–271. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_799_17.

19. Nesaratnam N, Emeriewen K, Smith J, David B, Wawrzynski J, Sharma A, Saleh GM. Scaling the punctum and canaliculus in patients undergoing punctoplasty surgery: A prospective cohort study. Orbit. 2017 Dec;36(6):436–440. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1343857. Epub 2017 Aug 16. Erratum in: Orbit. 2018 Feb; 37(1):xi. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1374915.

20. Meduri A, Tumminello G, Oliverio GW, Inferrera L, Delia G, Aragona P, Cicciù M. Use of Lacrimal Symptoms Questionnaire After Punctoplasty Surgery: Retrospective Data of Technical Strategy. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;32(8):2848– 2850. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007813.

21. Lima-Fontes M, Leuzinger-Dias M, Falcão-Reis F, Sousa C. Injection of Botulinum Toxin A in the Lacrimal Gland for Treatment of Epiphora in Crocodile Tears Syndrome — A Case Report. Int Med Case Rep J. 2022 Sep 22;15:537–542. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S379024.

22. Schulz CB, Malhotra R. The ‘tears’ score: A tool for grading and monitoring epiphora. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul;32(4):2108–2115. doi: 10.1177/11206721221104550.