Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Local Radiation Complications Following Proton Therapy for Uveal Melanoma

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-596-603

Abstract

Purpose: to study the frequency and clinical symptoms of local radiation complications that occur after proton therapy in patients with uveal melanoma using pencil beam scanning technology. Patients and methods: The retrospective analysis included 35 patients with uveal melanoma who received proton therapy using pencil beam scanning technology in hypofractionation mode at a dose of 49 Gy in 7 fractions. The initial tumor prominence was 9.2 mm (Me 9.7; IQR 2.75), the base diameter was 16.1 mm (Me 16.5; IQR 11.25), and the follow-up period was 3 to 54 months (Me 13.0; IQR 9.5 months). Results. In the study group, sustained local tumor control was achieved in all patients, and complete tumor regression was observed in 3 patients in 22–26 months after the start of treatment. With a median follow-up of 13.0 months, a wide range of various radiation-related complications was observed, with the most common being ophthalmic hypertension (54.3 %), cataract (51.4 %), and neovascular glaucoma (34.3 %). In addition, dermatitis (34.4 %), dry eye syndrome (17.1 %), post-radiation retinopathy (14.3 %), hemophthalmus (8.6 %), and scleromaly (2.9 %) were recorded at various times. Secondary enucleation was performed in 6 (17.1 %) of the treated patients due to the development of secondary neovascular glaucoma or corneal ulcer with a risk of perforation. Conclusion. Proton therapy with a scanning pencil beam in hypofractionation mode in the treatment of UM is characterized by the same effectiveness of the local effect on the tumor and the range and frequency of post-radiation complications as the literature data. Not only the improvement of technology, the development of preventive measures, but also the definition of clear criteria for indications and limitations for the use of this treatment method are required to reduce the risk of developing post-radiation damage.

About the Authors

I. E. Panova
Saint Petersburg Branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Irina E. Panova - MD, Professor, deputy director for scientific work.

Yaroslav Gashek str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283; Kirochnaya str., 41, Saint-Petersburg, 191015; Universitetskaya emb., 7–9, Saint Petersburg, 199034



E. M. Svistunova
Saint Petersburg Branch of S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Evgeniia M. Svistunova – ophthalmologist.

Yaroslav Gashek str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283



N. A. Vorobyev
Saint-Petersburg State University; Medical Institute named after Berezin Sergey
Russian Federation

Nikolay A. Vorobyev - PhD, oncologist, radiologist, head of the Department of Proton Radiation Therapy.

Universitetskaya emb., 7–9, Saint Petersburg, 199034; Esenin str., 2/3a, St. Petersburg, 194354



N. I. Martynova
Medical Institute named after Berezin Sergey
Russian Federation

Natalia I. Martynova - oncologist, radiologist.

Esenin str., 2/3a, St. Petersburg, 194354



I. A.I. Al-Mousa
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Ibrahim A.I. Al-Mousa – resident.

Kirochnaya str., 41, Saint-Petersburg, 191015



References

1. Brovkina AF. (ed.). Ophthalmooncology: Manual for Physicians. Moscow: Meditsina; 2002:1–352 (In Russ.).

2. Souto EB, Zielinska A, Luis M, Carbone C, Martins-Gomes C, Silva AM. Uveal melanoma: Physiopathology and new in situ-specific therapies. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. 2019;84:15–32. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03860-z.

3. Hrbacek J, Kacperek A, Beenakker JM, Mortimer L, Denker A, Mazal A. PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2024;120(5):1307–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.017.

4. Liegl R, Schmelter V, Fuerweger C, Ehret F, Priglinger S, Muacevic A, Foerster P. Robotic CyberKnife radiosurgery for the treatment of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023;250:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.021.

5. Zemba M, Dumitrescu OM, Gheorghe AG, Radu M, Ionescu MA, Vatafu A, Dinu V. Ocular complications of radiotherapy in uveal melanoma. Cancers. 2023;15(2):333. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020333.

6. Yarovoy AA, Golanov AV, Galbatsova AG, Kostyuchenko VV, Osinov IK, Yarovaya VA. Treatment of uveal melanoma by stereotactic Gamma Knife radiosurgery: results of 10-year experience. Voprosy Onkologii. 2024;70(4):661–668 (In Russ.). doi: 10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-4-661-668.

7. Kaprin AD, Mardynskiy YuS. Therapeutic Radiology: National Guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2018:1–864 (In Russ.).

8. Hussain RN, Chiu A, Pittam B, Taktak A, Damato BE, Kacperek A, Errington D, Cauchi P, Chadha V, Connolly J, Salvi S. Proton beam radiotherapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma in the UK—national audit of referral patterns of 1084 cases. Eye. 2023;37(5):1033–1036. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02178-0.

9. Saakyan SV, Borodin YuI, Shirina TV. Evaluation of the treatment efficiency and survival of patients with uveal melanoma after treatment with a narrow medical proton beam. In: Coll. of scientific papers Scientific and practical conference with international participation “5th Russian National Ophthalmological Forum”. Moscow; 2012:516–520 (In Russ.).

10. Valsky VV, Saakyan SV, Borodin YuI. Complications after proton radiation therapy of uveal melanoma: treatment and prevention. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2013;6(3):12–15 (In Russ.).

11. Khoroshkov VS. History and prospects of proton therapy. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 2019;64(2):52–60 (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/article_5ca5fc2765c9f5.02525917.

12. Panova IE, Vorobyov NA, Samkovich EV, Svistunova EM, Martynova NI, Bykhovsky AA. Proton therapy for uveal melanoma (preliminary results). Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2023;3s:90–101 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2023-3s-90-101

13. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

14. Passarin O, Zografos L, Schalenbourg A, Moulin A, Hospital JE. Scleritis after proton therapy in uveal melanoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229:395–398. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299705.

15. Panova IE, Svistunova EM, Vorobyov NA, Samkovich EV, Martynova NI, Bykhovsky AA. Neovascular glaucoma as a complication of proton therapy for uveal melanoma. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2024;24(4):185–192 (In Russ.). doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2024-24-4-4.

16. Uveal melanoma. Clinical recommendations. 2020. URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/uvealnaja_melanoma.pdf (accessed 10 Mar 2025). (In Russ.).

17. Nathan P, Cohen V, Coupland S, Curtis K, Damato B, Evans J, Fenwick S, Kirkpatrick L, Li O, Marshall E, McGuirk K, Ottensmeier C, Pearce N, Salvi S, Stedman B, Szlosarek P, Turnbull N. Uveal Melanoma UK National Guidelines. European Journal of Cancer. 2015;51(16):2404–2412. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.013.

18. Rao PK, Barker C, Coit DG, Joseph RW, Materin M, Rengan R, Sosman J, Thompson JA, Albertini MR, Boland G, Carson Iii WE, Contreras C, Daniels GA, DiMaio D, Durham A, Fields RC, Fleming MD, Galan A, Gastman B, Grossman K, Guild V, Johnson D, Karakousis G, Lange JR; ScM; Margolin K, Nath S, Olszanski AJ, Ott PA, Ross MI, Salama AK, Skitzki J, Swetter SM, Wuthrick E, McMillian NR, Engh A. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Uveal Melanoma, Version 1.2019. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2020;18(2):120–131. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0007.

19. Lane AM, Kim IK, Gragoudas ES. Uveal Melanoma: Proton Beam Radiation Therapy. Clinical Ophthalmic Oncology. 2019;219–232. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17879-6_13.

20. Foti PV, Travali M, Farina R, Palmucci S, Spatola C, Liardo RLE, Milazzotto R, Raffaele L, Salamone V, Caltabiano R, Broggi G, Puzzo L, Russo A, Reibaldi M, Longo A, Vigneri P, Avitabile T, Ettorre GC, Basile A. Diagnostic methods and therapeutic options of uveal melanoma with emphasis on MR imaging—Part II: Treatment indications and complications. Insights Into Imaging. 2021;12(1):1–24. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01001-w.

21. Tseng VL, Coleman AL, Zhang ZF, McCannel TA. Complications from plaque versus proton beam therapy for choroidal melanoma: a qualitative systematic review. Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2016;7(3):169–185. doi: 10.4236/jct.2016.73018.

22. Conway RM, Poothullil AM, Daftari IK, Weinberg V, Chung JE, O’Brien JM. Estimates of ocular and visual retention following treatment of extra-large uveal melanomas by proton beam radiotherapy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2006;124(6):838– 843. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.6.838.

23. Thariat J, Maschi C, Lanteri S, Peyrichon ML, Baillif S, Herault J, Salleron J, Caujolle JP. Dry Eye Syndrome After Proton Therapy of Ocular Melanomas. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2017;98(1):142–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.199.


Review

For citations:


Panova I.E., Svistunova E.M., Vorobyev N.A., Martynova N.I., Al-Mousa I.A. Local Radiation Complications Following Proton Therapy for Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):596-603. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-596-603

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)