Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Problems of Intraocular Correction in Patients after Radial Keratotomy

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2026-2-259-267

Abstract

Widespread use of radial keratotomy (RKT) at the end of the last century determined numerous difficulties in planning intraocular correction in this group of patients associated with the calculation of the optical power of the intraocular lens (IOL), the choice of the type of intraocular correction and the specifics of surgical intervention. Postkeratotomic deformations are usually accompanied by irregular changes in the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, and, despite the advent of new calculation formulas, make the refractive result difficult to predict. Modern research methods allow a detailed analysis of keratotopographic parameters in complex clinical situations when determining indications for implantation of toric IOLs. At the same time, a wide range of IOLs of various types and designs, with functionality of obtaining vision at different distances, allows not only implantation of monofocal IOLs, but requires systematization of existing knowledge, in relation to patients with complex corneal surface relief. Recommendations for implantation of multifocal IOLs (MIOLs) are in most cases of a cautionary nature due to the peculiarities of image formation when using the diffraction design of the optical part. The principle of splitting the light flux, accompanied by a high probability of photopic phenomena and potentially affecting the indices of contrast sensitivity, in combination with the difficulty of predicting the achievement of target refraction are among the main limiting factors. The group of lenses with extended depth of focus is free from many of the disadvantages of MIOLs, but also needs to be studied in patients with RKT. Thus, the question of choosing the type of optical correction is directly determined by a number of factors, the consistent study of which is of great practical importance for determining the optimal strategy when planning intraocular correction in patients with a history of RKT.

About the Author

N. S. Timofeyeva
Cheboksary Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Timofeyeva Nina S. - PhD, head of the operating unit 

Traktostroiteley ave., 10, Cheboksary, 428028



References

1. Neroev VV. Ophthalmological morbidity in the Russian Federation. Available from: https://ovis.ru/ru/encyclopedia/ophthalmological-morbidity-in-russian-federation 2024/ (accessed July 1st 2025) (In Russ.).

2. Anisimov SI, Anisimova SYu, Smotrich EA, Zavgorodnyaya TS, Zolotorevsky KA. Keratotensotopography — new diagnostic possibilities for studying of the biomechanical cornea properties. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2011;8(4):13–17 (In Russ.).

3. Cláudia M. Francesconi Radial Keratotomy. Available from: https://entokey.com/radial-keratotomy/ (accessed July 1st 2025).

4. Bourque LB, Cosand BB, Drews C, Waring GO 3rd, Lynn M, Cartwright C. Reported satisfaction, fluctuation of vision, and glare among patients one year after surgery in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(3):356–363. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150056026.

5. Lynn MJ, Waring GO, Sperdutto RD. Factors affecting and predictability of radial keratotomy in the PERK study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:42–51. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010048030.

6. Bullimore MA, Sheedy JE, Owen D. Diurnal visual changes in radial keratotomy: implications for visual standards. Refractive Surgery Study Group. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71(8):516–521. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199408000-00005.

7. McDonnell PJ, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Waring GO. Morning-to-evening change in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity 11 years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):233–239. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30711-2.

8. Rashid ER, Waring GO 3rd. Complications of radial and transverse keratotomy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;34(2):73–106. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(89)90037-4.

9. Charpentier DY, Garcia P, Grunewald F, Brousse D, Duplessix M, David T. Refractive results of radial keratotomy after 10 years. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(6):646–648. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19981101-13.

10. Tsyrenzhapova EK, Rozanova OI, Mikhalevich IM, Rozanov IS. Improving the diagnosis of postkeratotomic corneal deformity using artificial intelligence methods to optimize the calculation of intraocular lenses. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2025;18(S3):37–42 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-3-supplement-37-42.

11. Khoroshilova-Maslova IP, Andreeva LD, Ilatovskaya LV, Kuznetsova IA. Clinical and histopathologicalstudies of enucleated eyes with contusion ruptures afterradial keratotomy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 1998;4:3–8 (In Russ.).

12. Avetisov SE, Antonov AA, Mitichkina TS, Vedmedenko II, Avetisov KS. On the question of progressive hyperopia correction after radial keratotomy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(5):226231 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2020136052226.

13. Bikbulatova AA, Pasikova NV. Phacoemulsification of cataract 19 years after radial keratotomy (clinical case). Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2014;3:23–25 (In Russ.).

14. Panteleev EN, Malyugin BE, Bessarabov AN, Semakina AS, Khapaeva LL. Carrying out corneal tunnel incision in patients after radial keratotomy during phacoemulsification. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019;5:121–124 (In Russ.).

15. Bikbulatova AA, Pasikova NV. Iatrogenic keratectasia as a late complication of anterior keratotomy. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015;187(12):38–40 (In Russ.).

16. Iskakov IA. Processes for manufacturing multifocal diffractive-refractive intraocular lenses. Avtometriya. 2017;53(5):30–39 (In Russ.). doi: 10.15372/AUT20170503.

17. KohnenT. Current and future nomenclature and categorization ofintraocularlenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024;50(8):787–788. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001510.

18. Alfonso JF, Martín-Escuer B, Domínguez-Vicent A, Montés-Micó R, FernándezVega L. Lensectomy after radial keratotomy: 1-year follow-up. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(11):2561–2568. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01104-w.

19. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1998;14(4):397–407. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-19980701-05.

20. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic cornealrefractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1396–1403.

21. Shammas HJ. Improving Quality of Vision After Cataract Surgery. Cataract Refractive Surgery Today. 2014:3–4.

22. Nuzzi R, Monteu F, Tridico F. Implantation of a Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens after Radial Keratotomy and Cross-Linking with Hyperopia and Astigmatism Residues: A Case Report. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2017;8(2):440–445. doi: 10.1159/000479813.

23. Shukhaev SV. Selection of keratometric data for the iol toricity calculation. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2023;3s:27–36 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/02354160-2023-3S-27-36.

24. Mimura T, Fujimura S, Yamagami S, Usui T, Honda N, Shirakawa R, Fukuoka S, Amano S. Severe hyperopic shift and irregular astigmatism after radial keratotomy. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35(6):345–347. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181bece3d.

25. Kemp JR, Martinez CE, Klyce SD, Coorpender SJ, McDonald MB, Lucci L, Lynn MJ, Waring GO 3rd. Diurnal fluctuations in corneal topography 10 years afterradial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(7):904–910. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00090-5.

26. Basilious A, Basilious A. Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation After Radial Keratotomy. Journal of refractive surgery case reports. 2022;2(4):e68–e71. doi: 10.3928/jrscr-20221130-01.

27. Likhorad E, Beliakouski P, Pazniak M. Toric IOL implantation in patients with previously performed radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology. Eastern Europe. 2022;12(1):18–24 (In Russ.). doi: 10.34883/PI.2022.12.1.019.

28. Chen SSW, Torii H, Yotsukura E, Nishi Y, Negishi K. Implantation of a toric intraocular lens after repeated radial keratotomy procedures: A case report. Heliyon. 2023;9(12):e22500. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22500.

29. Canedo ALC, Wang L, Koch DD, Al-Mohtaseb Z. Accuracy of astigmatism correctionwith toric intraocularlensimplantation in eyeswith previousradial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(4):417–420. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000779.

30. Messenger WB, Ambati BK. Unilateral implantation of a pseudoaccommodating toric intraocular lens in 2 patients after radial keratotomy. JCRS Online Case Reports. 2014;2(4):73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcro.2014.09.005.

31. Weinberger D, Fink-Cohen S, Axer-Siegel R. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment operation after radial keratotomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75(2):214–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00127.x.

32. Bang SP, Aaker JD, Sabesan R, Yoon G. Improvement of neural contrast sensitivity after long-term adaptation in pseudophakic eyes. Biomed Opt Express. 2022;13(9):4528–4538. doi: 10.1364/BOE.465117.

33. Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(4):703–711. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01648-6.

34. Bikbov ММ, Altynbayeva GR. Оcular optic system aberrations following implantation of various multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2012;7(2):20–23 (In Russ.).

35. Konovalov ME, Burdel KV, Zenina ML, Konovalova MM, Reznikova AB. Features multifocal iols calculation in patients after radial keratotomy. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2019;31(6):46–53 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2019-646-53.

36. Martín-Escuer B, Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Domíngez-VicentA, MontésMicó R. Refractive correction with multifocal intraocular lenses after radial keratotomy. Eye (Lond). 2019 Jun;33(6):1000–1007. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0364-8.

37. Gupta I, Oakey Z, Ahmed F, Ambati BK. Spectacle Independence after Cataract Extraction in Post-Radial Keratotomy Patients Using Hybrid Monovision with ReSTOR(®) Multifocal and TECNIS(®) Monofocal Intraocular Lenses. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2014;5(2):157–161. doi: 10.1159/000363372.

38. Agarwal S, Thornell E. Spectacle Independence in Patients with Prior Radial Keratotomy Following Cataract Surgery: A Case Series. Int Med Case Rep J. 2020;13:53–60. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S230863.

39. Breyer DRH, Kaymak H, Ax T, Kretz FTA, Auffarth GU, Hagen PR. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6(4):339–349. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017186.

40. Karuppiah P, Varman NVA, Varman A, Balakumar D. Comparison of clinical outcomes of trifocal intraocular lens (AT LISA, Eyecryl SERT trifocal) versus extended depth of focus intraocular lens (Eyhance, Eyecryl SERT EDOF). Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(8):2867–2871. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2921_21. Erratum in: Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(12):4472. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.362035.

41. Asena L, Kırcı Dogan İ, Oto S, Dursun Altınors D. Comparison of visual performance and quality of life with a new nondiffractive EDOF intraocular lens and a trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(5):504–511. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001142.

42. Kohnen T. Optical Design and Functional Classification of Contemporary Intraocular Lenses. Alcon Inc. 6/24 IMG-VIV-2400020. 2024. URL: https://crstodayeurope.com/articles/optical-design-and-functional-classification-of-contemporary-intraocular-lenses/optical-design-and-functional-classification-of-contemporary-intraocular-lenses/ (accessed 15.07.2025).

43. Dołowiec-Kwapisz A, Misiuk-Hojło M, Piotrowska H. Cataract Surgery after Radial Keratotomy with Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Lens Implantation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(5):689. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050689.

44. Baartman BJ, Karpuk K, Eichhorn B, Ferguson TJ, Sudhagoni RG, Berdahl JP, Thompson VM. Extended depth of focus lens implantation after radial keratotomy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1401–1408. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S208550.

45. Kim KH, Seok KW, Kim WS. Multifocal Intraocular Lens Results in Correcting Presbyopia in Eyes After Radial Keratotomy. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(6):e22–e25. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000208.

46. Barnett V, Barsam A, Than J, Srinivasan S. Small-aperture intraocular lens combined with secondary piggyback intraocular lens during cataract surgery after previous radial keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):1042–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.005.

47. Dick HB, Piovella M, Vukich J, Vilupuru S, Lin L. Clinical Investigators. Prospective multicenter trial of a small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):956–968. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.038.

48. Tsyrenzhapova EK, Rozanova OI, Seliverstova NN. Analysis of optical properties of posterior surface of cornea in patients after anterior radial keratotomy. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(4):24–29 (In Russ.). doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.4.3.

49. Kasyanov AA, Ryzhkova EG. IOL power calculation features after radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022;19(2):325–333 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/18165095-2022-2-325-333.

50. Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(10):1658–1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.029.

51. Pasikova NV, Bikbulatova AA. Сlinical case of intraocular lens power calculation after the frontradial keratotomy. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2016;94(2-1):124–127 (In Russ.).

52. Geggel HS. Intraocular Lens Power Selection after Radial Keratotomy: Topography, Manual, and IOLMaster Keratometry Results Using Haigis Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):897–902. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.12.002.

53. Bogush IV. Combined method of intraocular lens power calculation affer radial keratotomy. The siberian scientific medical journal. 2009;29(4):93–99 (In Russ.).

54. Panteleev EN, Bessarabov AN, Agafonov SG, Khaludorova NB. Possibilities of using standard methods for assessing the refractive power of the cornea to calculate the optical power of IOLs after anterior dosed radial keratotomy. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011;14(133):295–297 (In Russ.).

55. Awwad ST, Dwarakanathan S, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Verity SM, Mootha VV, McCulley JP. Intraocular lens power calculation after radial keratotomy: estimating the refractive corneal power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(6):1045–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.018.

56. Ioshin IE. Phacoemulsification and calculation of intraocular lenses in patients given keratorefractive surgery. Part 2. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2021;14(4):118–125 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-4-118-125.

57. Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;238(9):765–773. doi: 10.1007/s004170000188.

58. Moshirfar M, Sperry RA, Altaf AW, Stoakes IM, Hoopes PC. Predictability of Existing IOL Formulas After Cataract Surgery in Patients with a Previous History of Radial Keratotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024;13(6):1703–1722. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00946-7.

59. Olsen T, Hoffmann P. C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):764–773. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.037.

60. Moshirfar M, Duong AA, Shmunes KM, Castillo-Ronquillo YS, Hoopes PC. Light Adjustable Intraocular Lens for Cataract Surgery After Radial Keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 2020;36(12):852–854. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201002-01.


Review

For citations:


Timofeyeva N.S. Problems of Intraocular Correction in Patients after Radial Keratotomy. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2026;23(2):259-267. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2026-2-259-267

Views: 15

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)