Efficiency of Transscleral Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation in Different Types of Glaucoma
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2026-2-294-303
Abstract
Transscleral micropulse cyclophotocoagulation is a safe method for reducing ophthalmotonus, which has proven its effectiveness in various forms of glaucoma, including patients with high visual acuity.
Рurpose: to study the effectiveness of transscleral micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) in various types of glaucoma.
Materials and methods. The data of 193 eyes of 192 patients with decompensated glaucoma (primary open-angle glaucoma, secondary glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, including after IOL repositioning, primary angle-closure glaucoma) of various stages who underwent MP-TSCPC were analyzed. The observation period was up to 12 months. MP-TSCPC was performed on a Vitra A 810 device (Quantel Medical, France) with the following laser parameters: energy — W = 2000 mW, cycle exposure 31.3 %, total exposure time on four sectors — 160 sec.
Results. The MP-TSCPC is effective in POAG, where the IOP reduction was 32 % from the initial value by the end of the observation period, as well as in PACG, where the reduction by the end of 6 months was 51–56 % from the initial values. In secondary glaucoma by the end of the observation period — 37.5 % of the initial IOP, but without achieving the target values, including in neovascular glaucoma — 29 %. The total effectiveness of MP-TSCPC in the POAG group was 76.5 %, secondary glaucoma — 61.5 %, PACG — 100 %, neovascular glaucoma — 70 %, after IOL repositioning — 76.5 %. At the same time, no difference in effectiveness was found between the groups (p = 0.117). MP-TSCPC is more effective in advanced glaucoma, where by the end of the observation the hypotensive effect was 40 % of the initial value, and in advanced glaucoma, where it was 38 % of the initial one. The total effectiveness of MP-TSCPC in the advanced glaucoma group was 73.3 %, in advanced glaucoma — 80.3 %, in terminal glaucoma — 75 %, with no difference in effectiveness between the groups (p = 0.938). After MP-TSCPC, the number of drops of local hypotensive therapy decreased from 3.09 ± 0.6 to 2.95 ± 0.67 (p = 0.011). When performing MP-TSCPC to relieve pain in 43 eyes, the result was achieved in all cases.
Conclusion. MP-TSCPC has proven to be an effective and safe intervention for various types of glaucoma, with maximum effectiveness in the case of POAG and PACG at early and advanced stages. In various types of secondary glaucoma, the hypotensive effect is pronounced and persistent, but in a greater number of eyes without achieving compensation. Also, MP-TSCPC can be recommended for pain relief and reducing the drug load.
About the Authors
A. V. MalyshevRussian Federation
Malyshev Alexey V. - MD, head of the Ophthalmology Department, chief ophthalmologist of the Krasnodar Krai Ministry of Health, head of the Ophthalmology Department, Professor of the Ophthalmology Department, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
1st May str., 167, Krasnodar, 350000
A. S. Apostolova
Russian Federation
Apostolova Anastasia S. - PhD, ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, physician in the Diagnostic Department, Associate Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
Boris Galushkin str., 3, Moscow, 129301
D. N. Lovpache
Russian Federation
Lovpache Dzhamilya N. - PhD, Glaucoma Expert of the Russian Glaucoma Society, surgeon, Associate Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Boris Galushkin str., 3, Moscow, 129301;
Ostrovityanova str., 1, Moscow, 117513
A. A. Sergienko
Russian Federation
Sergienko Alexey A. - PhD, ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, Associate Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
Pobeda sq., 1, Krasnodar, 1350007
A. F. Teshev
Russian Federation
Teshev Adam F. - PhD, ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, head of the Eye Department, Associate Professor of the Ophthalmology Department, chief ophthalmologist of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Adygea
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
Zhukovsky str., 4, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic
G. Yu. Karapetov
Russian Federation
Karapetov Garry Yu. - PhD, ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, Associate Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
1st May str., 167, Krasnodar, 350000
M. K. Ashkhamakhova
Russian Federation
Ashkhamakhova Marina K. - ophthalmologist, assistant Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
Zhukovsky str., 4, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic
B. N. Hatsukova
Russian Federation
Khatsukova Bella N. - PhD, ophthalmologist, assistant Professor of the Ophthalmology Department
Pervomayskaya str., 191, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic;
Zhukovsky str., 4, Maykop, 385000, Adygea Republic
References
1. Kuroyedov AV, Gorodnichiy VV, Gaponko OV, Grigoriev DV, Diordiychuk SV, Krivulina DA, Mikulik VV, Petrov AA. Topical hypotensive therapy preceding surgical treatment of glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2023;22(3):34–43 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-3-34-43.
2. Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Ambler G, Bunce C, Wormald R, Nathwani N, Barton K, Rubin G, Buszewicz M. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatmentof ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019;393:1505–1516. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X.
3. Anisimova SYu, Anisimov SI, Kochmala OB, Ling P, Vokuev MA, Gavrilova NA. Comparative outcomes of topical and laser treatment in newly diagnosed patients with primary glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2024;23(3):37–43 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2024-23-3-37-43.
4. Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Shi W, Lim KS. Treatment Outcomesin the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:650–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.003.
5. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Korneeva EA, Solovyeva GM. Preliminary outcomes of PreserFlo® microshunt implantation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2025;24(1):24–31 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2025-24-1-24-31.
6. Aquino MC, Barton K, Tan AMW, Sng C, Li X, Loon SC, Chew PT. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2015;43(1):40–46. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12360.
7. Williams IM, Neerukonda VK, Stagner AM. The Histopathology of Two Eyes Enucleated after Continuous Transscleral and Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Refractory Secondary Glaucoma. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2022 Jun;8(2):93–99. doi: 10.1159/000521739.
8. Ioshin IE, Maksimov IV, Berezenko EA. Morphometric analysis of the anterior chamber in patients with refractory glaucoma after micropulse cyclophotocoagulation. National Journal glaucoma. 2024;23(1):13–21 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/20784104-2024-23-1-13-21.
9. Kurysheva NI, Radjabov MM, Radjabov MM. Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in micropulse mode in the treatment of initial primary open-angle glaucoma. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2020;4(35):136–137 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/2312-4911-2020-4-136-137.
10. Ioshin IE, Tolchinskaya AI, Rakova AV, Maksimov IV. Results of micropulse cyclophotocoagulation in patients with early stages of primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2022;21(4):22–28 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-41042022-21-4-22-28.
11. Johansyah CAP, Bambang L. A Systematic Review of Cyclophotocoagulation Techniques: Continuous Wave Versus Micropulse for Glaucoma Treatment. Beyoglu Eye J. 2024 Mar 1;9(1):1–7. doi: 10.14744/bej.2024.47123.
12. Sanchez FG, Lerner F, Sampaolesi J, Noecker R. Efficacy and Safety of Micropulse(R) Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2018; 93(12):573–579. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2018.08.003.
13. Zemba M, Dumitrescu OM, Vaida F, Dimirache EA, Pistolea I, Stamate AC, Burcea M, Branisteanu DC, Balta F, Barac IR. Micropulse vs. continuouswave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma. Exp Ther Med. 2022 Apr;23(4):278. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11207.
14. Szilagyi Z, Kranitz K, Nagy ZZ, Recsan Z. Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Results in Secondary Glaucoma. Life (Basel). 2023 May 9;13(5):1149. doi: 10.3390/life13051149.
15. Nguyen AT, Maslin J, Noecker RJ. Early results of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30(4):700–705. doi: 10.1177/1120672119839303.
16. Souissi S, Baudouin C, Labbé A, Hamard P. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using a standard protocol in patients with refractory glaucoma naive of cyclodestruction. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;31(1):112–119. doi: 10.1177/1120672119877586.
17. Garcia GA, Nguyen CV, Yelenskiy A, Akiyama G, McKnight B, Chopra V, Lu K, Huang A, Tan JCH, Francis BA. Micropulse Transscleral Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation in Refractory Glaucoma: Short-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Impact of Surgical History on Outcomes. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Nov-Dec;2(6):402–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.08.009.
18. Tekeli O, Köse HC. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and secondary glaucoma. EurJOphthalmol. 2021 May;31(3):1113–1121. doi: 10.1177/1120672120914231.
19. Kuciel-Polczak I, Helemejko M, Dobrowolski D, Janiszewska-Bil D, Krysik K, Grabarek BO, Lyssek-Boroń A. Assessment of the Effectiveness of Glaucoma Treatment Using MicroPulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients with Glaucoma Who Have Previously Undergone Vitreoretinal Surgery. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):179–193. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00598-5.
20. de Crom RMPC, Slangen CGMM, Kujovic-Aleksov S, Webers CAB, Berendschot TTJM, Beckers HJM. Micropulse Trans-scleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Patients With Glaucoma: 1- and 2-Year Treatment Outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2020 Sep;29(9):794–798. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001552.
21. Varikuti VNV, Shan P, Rai O, Chaves AC, Miranda A, Lim B. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in eyeswith good central vision. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:901–905. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001339.
22. Ioshin IE, Tolchinskaya AI, Maksimov IV, Rakova AV, Potapova OM, Illarionova AL, Romanova IA, Smirnova EV. Experience of repeated mCFC in the treatment of patients with refractory glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2021;20(3):30–39 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-3-30-39.
23. ELGwaily AM, Khedr SA, Assaf AH, Latif MAMAL, Elsayed HA, Latif AAMAL. MicroPulse® transscleral laser therapy in the management of glaucoma patients. Arch Soc EspOftalmol (Engl Ed). 2021 Dec;96(12):64030–39. 648. doi: 10.1016/j.oftale.2020.12.005.
24. Vig N, Ameen S, Bloom P, Crawley L, Normando E, Porteous A, Ahmed F. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation: initialresults using a reduced energy protocol in refractory glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 May;258(5):107330–39.1079. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04611-0.
Review
For citations:
Malyshev A.V., Apostolova A.S., Lovpache D.N., Sergienko A.A., Teshev A.F., Karapetov G.Yu., Ashkhamakhova M.K., Hatsukova B.N. Efficiency of Transscleral Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation in Different Types of Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2026;23(2):294-303. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2026-2-294-303
JATS XML



































