RESULTS OF NEW RUSSIAN INTRAOCULAR LENSES IMPLANTATION
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2017-4-299-305
Abstract
Purpose: to analyze the data obtained from a multicenter study of the hydrophobic IOL Citrin and a hydrophilic IOL Aquamarine implantation and a comparison of the Acrysoft IQ with Citrine and IOL by the given parameters.
Patients and methods. A total of 100 IOLs produced by NanOptic (96 hydrophobic IOLs Citrine and 4 hydrophilic IOLs Aquamarine) and 24 IOL Acrysoft IQ were implanted. 7 ophthalmological clinics in different Russian cities took part in the study. The observation period was from 1 to 10 months. The indication for phacoemulsification was age cataract in 99 cases (99 eyes). The clear lens was removed for refractive purpose in one patient (2 eyes) with high degree of myopia. The age of the patients was 34–81. The basic examination was made for patients before the operation. The mean uncorrected visual acuity before the operation was (UCVA) 0.13±0.14 (0.001–0.6), the average corrected visual acuity (BVVA) was 0.32±0.28 (0.001–0.85). All patients underwent standard phacoemulsification.
Results. There were no complication in the early postoperative period. In the postoperative period, the mean UCVA was 0.52±0.24 (0.2–1.0), the mean VCVA was 0.75±0.24 (0.3–1.0). In all cases, the refraction obtained was consistent with the prediction. The error in calculating the IOL was minimal and permissible. In 72% cases, the threshold contrast sensitivity was normal or slightly decreased. In some cases, there were difficulties in implantation of a hydrophobic IOL. At the same time, difficulties in implanting the hydrophilic IOL weren’t registered.
Conclusions. The first results of implantation of new Russian IOLs on the given parameters appeared to be satisfactory. Further research, including the dynamic long term observation of the implantation results is required.About the Authors
D. D. DementyevRussian Federation
Dement´ev Dmitrii. D. - PhD, Medical director
Davydkovskaya str, 3-2, Moscow, 121352
M. V. Sysoeva
Russian Federation
Sysoeva Mary V. – ophthalmologist.
Davydkovskaya str, 3-2, Moscow, 121352
A. V. Shipunova
Russian Federation
Shipunova Ann. V. - PhD, Ophthalmologist.
Davydkovskaya str, 3-2, Moscow, 121352
I. M. Ivanchikova
Russian Federation
Ivanchikova Iren. M. – ophthalmologist.
Davydkovskaya str, 3-2, Moscow, 121352
References
1. Schmidt D, Grzybowski A. Vincenz Fukala (1847-1911): versatile surgeon and early historian of ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(6):550–556. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.04.002.
2. Schmidt D, Grzybowski A. Vincenz Fukala (1847-1911) and the early history of clear lens operations in high myopia. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(9):636–637. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110802-04.
3. Schmidt D, Grzybowski A. Vincenz Fukala (1847-1911) and the early history of clear lens operations in high myopia. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2013;27:41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.11.002.
4. Svyataslav. N. Fyodorov. The “Sputnik” intraocular lens. In book:The History of Modern Cataract Surgery. ed. Marvin L. Kwitko and Charles D. Kelmann. Kugler Publ. 1998, pp. 107-110
5. Сысоева М.В., Шипунова А.В, Иванчикова И.М. Первый опыт использования новой ИОЛ российского производства при коррекции миопии высокой степени. Офтальмология. 2017;14(1):88-91. [Sysoeva M.V., Shipunova A.V., Ivanchikova I.M. The first results of lens exchange for «Aquamarine», Nanooptica (Russia) IOL in patients with high myopia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2017;14(1): 88-91/ (in Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2017-1-88-91
6. Farbowitz MA, Zabriskie NA, Crandall AS, et al. Visual complaints associated with the AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1339-1345.
7. Arne JL. Phakic intraocular lens implantation versus clear lens extraction in highly myopic eyes of 30- to 50-year-old patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:2092–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.082.
8. Emarah AM, El-Helw MA, Yassin HM. Comparison of clear lens extraction and collamer lens implantation in high myopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;14:447–454.
9. Fernández-Vega L, Alfonso JF, Villacampa T. Clear lens extraction for the correction of high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2349–2354. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00794-2.
10. Gabrić N, Dekaris I, Karaman Z. Refractive lens exchange for correction of high myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2002;12:384–387.
11. Hoffman RS, Fine IH, Packer M. Refractive lens exchange as a refractive surgery modality. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15(1):22–28. doi: 10.1097/00055735200402000-00005.
12. Krader-Gutman C. Lens Exchange. Euro Times. 2012;17:9.
13. Packer M, Fine H, Hoffman RS. Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery. In: Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS, editors. Refractive lens Exchange. Berlin: Springer; 2005. pp. 11–20.
14. American Academy of Ophthalmology: Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. In Cataract in the Adult Eye. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011. Available at: http://one.aao.org/guidelines browse?filterĽ preferred practicepatternsguideline. Accessed July 15, 2014. http://one.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/cataract-in-adult-eye-ppp--october-2011
15. Packer M, Fine H, Hoffman RS. Biometry for Refractive Lens Surgery. In: Fine IH, Packer M, Hoffman RS, editors. Refractive lens Exchange. Berlin: Springer; 2005. pp. 11–20.
16. Wang JK, Chang SW. Optical biometry — intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths. Int J Ophthalmol.2013;6(2):150–154. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.02.08
17. Kubaloğlu A, Yazicioğlu T, Tacer S. Small incision clear lens extraction for correction of high myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:1–6.
Review
For citations:
Dementyev D.D., Sysoeva M.V., Shipunova A.V., Ivanchikova I.M. RESULTS OF NEW RUSSIAN INTRAOCULAR LENSES IMPLANTATION. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2017;14(4):299-305. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2017-4-299-305