Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Patients Operated on for Glaucoma
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-220-224
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the results of operation in patients with glaucoma depending on its stage, terms of follow-up and detection.
Patients and methods. 102 patients (204 eyes) operated on at IRTC “Eye Microsurgery” Tambov branch within October-November 2017 were examined. Mean age was 69.6 ± 9.5 years old. There were 58 male and 44 female. Patients’ eyes were divided into 4 groups: eyes with absolute glaucoma (33), III stage of glaucoma (71), I–II stage of glaucoma (54) and healthy eyes (46). The age of glaucoma patients in all groups was almost identical: age 60-69 years old (47.7%) and 70–79 (31.3%) prevailed.
Results. The mean follow-up period was 2.2 years (from 1 week to 11 years), the average number of examinations per patient in a year was 5. Before the first surgery 16% of the eyes with absolute glaucoma were detected, 40% — with III stage glaucoma, 26.5% — I–II stage glaucoma, the rest 17.5% were healthy (paired) eyes. Within the total follow-up 211 antiglaucomatous and 36 cataract surgeries were performed. The marked visual improvement was not noted after antiglaucomatous surgeries. In 5 patients without any glaucoma symptoms but followed up during 5-10 years without interruption absolute glaucoma was revealed. Among the above mentioned patients 3 had a rather high level of tolerant pressure (17 mm Hg) and high true IOP (25 mm Hg), other 2 — low tolerant pressure (12–14 mm Hg) and normal true IOP (19–20 mm Hg).
Conclusion. If glaucoma is diagnosed based on the examinations and patient received treatment, he/she should be under the supervision of an experienced ophthalmologist who determine and change treatment in time, including early surgery.
About the Authors
V. A. MachekhinRussian Federation
Rasskazovskoe shosse, 1, Tambov, 392000;
Sovetskaya str., 93, Tambov, 392000
O. L. Fabrikantov
Russian Federation
Rasskazovskoe shosse, 1, Tambov, 392000;
Sovetskaya str., 93, Tambov, 392000
V. A. L’vov
Russian Federation
Rasskazovskoe shosse, 1, Tambov, 392000
References
1. WHO (1988) Coding instructions for the WHO/PBL eye examination record (version III). Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who. int/hq/1988/PBL_88.1.pdf. Accessed 18 January 2018.
2. Pascolini D., Mariotti S.P. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br. J. Ophthalmology. 2012;96(5):614–8. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301861
3. Song P., Wang J., Bucan K., et al. National and subnational prevalence and burden of glaucoma in China: A systematic analysis. Journal of global health. 2017;7(2):1–16. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.07.020705
4. Barry R., Murray P. Unregistered visual impairment: is registration a failing system? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:995–8. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059915
5. Ang G., Eke T. Life time visual prognosis for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Eye. 2007;21:604–8. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702284
6. Kooner K., Byung M., Cho J., Adams-Huet B. Risk. Factors for progression to blindness in high tension primary open angle glaucoma: Comparison of blind and nonblind subjects. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008;2(4):757–62.
7. Мачехин В.А., Фабрикантов О.Л. К вопросу о раннем выявлении и диспансеризации больных глаукомой. Практическая медицина. Офтальмология. 2013;3- 1(69):44–47. [Machekhin V.A., Fabrikantov O.L. With regard to early detection and medical examination of patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology=Oftal’mologiya. 2013;3-1(69):44–47. (In Russ.)]
8. Rossetti L., Digiuni M., Giovanni M., et al. Blindness and Glaucoma: A Multicenter Data Review from 7 Academic Eye Clinics. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:8(e0136632). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136632
9. Bourne R., Jonas J., Flaxman S., еt al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in highincome countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990–2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:629–38. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304033 PMID: 24665132
10. Stevens G, White R., Flaxman S. et al. Global prevalence of visual impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:2377–84. DOI: ORG/10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2013.05.025
11. Peters D., Bengtsson B., Heijl A. Lifetime risk of blindness in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(4):724–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.027
12. Мачехин В.А. Ретинотомографические исследования диска зрительного нерва в норме и при глаукоме. Москва: Офтальмология; 2011. [Machekhin V.A. [Retinotomographic examinations of optic disc in normal patients and glaucoma. Moscow: Ophthalmology; 2011. (In Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Machekhin V.A., Fabrikantov O.L., L’vov V.A. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Patients Operated on for Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(2S):220-224. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-220-224