A Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Microinvasive Posterior Vitrectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Non-Full Thickness Macular Holes
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-239-245
Abstract
Purpose: to study the effectiveness of the posterior microinvasive vitrectomy in the surgical treatment of non-full thickness macular holes on the basis of the retrospective analysis of the retina changes, identified by OCT, and functional outcomes of surgical treatment.
Patients and Methods. A retrospective analysis of outcomes of posterior microinvasive vitrectomy was performed in 30 patients operated about non-full thickness macular holes. The following features were assessed: maximum diameter of the non-full thickness macular holes, the diameter at the base of the hole, the minimum thickness of the retina before and after operation, the maximum thickness of the retina before and after surgery. In addition, the configuration of the hole edges before surgery, the presence of intraretinal cysts before and after surgery, the integrity of the ellipsoid zone of the photoreceptors before and after the operation and the restoration of fovea centralis as a result of surgical treatment were assessed.
Results. As a result of surgical treatment the closure of non-full thickness macular holes was reached in all cases. The most corrected visual acuity in the postoperative period was ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 (0,66 ± 0,04). The visual acuity improved in 20 cases (64.5%), remained at the same level in 8 cases (25.8%) and decreased in 3 cases (9.6%, in 1 case due to the development of cataracts). The results of correlation analysis has allowed to establish correlation between the initial BCVA and the maximum retinal thickness (R = –0.4), and residual retinal thickness in the area of the hole (R = –0.3). The increase in visual acuity after surgical treatment significantly affected the recovery of the ellipsoid zone of the photoreceptors (RD = 0.833), regression of the retinal thickness (R = 0.42). In addition, the initial diameter of non-full thickness macular holes, both external and at the base, also had an impact on the increase in BCVA (R = –0.3 and R = –0.25, respectively).
Conclusion. Posterior microinvasive vitrectomy in the surgical treatment of non-full thickness macular holes is a highly effective method of treatment, as evidenced by the closure of the defect and improvement or stabilization of the most corrected visual acuity 90.4% cases. On the basis of the retrospective analysis it is found that the most significant increase in the most corrected visual acuity was increased in patients with low visual acuity. The recovery of the ellipsoid zone of photoreceptors, regression of the retinal thickness and the diameter of non-full thickness macular holes, both external and at the base mostly influences nn the recovery of the most corrected visual acuity.
About the Authors
Y. V. BayborodovRussian Federation
PhD, head of the 7th eye microsurgery department,
Yaroslava Gasheka str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283
K. S. Zhogolev
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist of the 7th eye microsurgery department,
Yaroslava Gasheka str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283
L. I. Balashevich
Russian Federation
MD, professor, chief scientific advisor, academician of Russian Academy of Natural Science,
Yaroslava Gasheka str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283
I. E. Panova
Russian Federation
MD, professor, vice-director,
Yaroslava Gasheka str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283
D. R. Mirsaitova
Russian Federation
junior research scientist, ophthalmologist,
Yaroslava Gasheka str., 21, Saint Petersburg, 192283
References
1. Gass J.D. Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction: a clinicopathologic case report. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 1975; 73:230–50.
2. Michalewska Z. Non-Full Thickness Macular Holes: A Closer Look. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers. 2012;43(2):152–60.
3. Балашевич Л.И., Байбородов Я.В., Жоголев К.С. Патология витреомакулярного интерфейса. Обзор литературы в вопросах и ответах. Офтальмохирургия. 2014;1:109–114. [Balashevich L.I., Bayborodov Ya.V., Zhogolev K.S. Pathology of the vitreomacular interface. A review of the literature in questions and answers. Ophthalmosurgery= Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2014;1:109–114. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2014-4-109-114
4. Haouchine B., Massin P., Tadayoni R., Erginay A., Gaudric A. Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;138: 732–9.
5. Michalewski J., Michalevska Z., Dziegielewski K., Nawrocki J. Evolution from a macular pseudohole to lamellar macular hole. Graefes Arch. Clin Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011;249:175–8. 29. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1463-1
6. Балашевич Л.И., Байбородов Я.В., Жоголев К.С. Хирургическое лечение патологии витреомакулярного интерфейса. Обзор литературы в вопросах и ответах. Офтальмохирургия. 2015;2:80–85. [Balashevich L.I., Bayborodov Ya.V., Zhogolev K.S. Surgical treatment of the pathology of the vitreomacular interface. A review of the literature in questions and answers. Ophthalmosurgery= Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2015;2:80–85. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2015-2- 80-86
7. Шкворченко Д.О., Шпак А.А., Миронова Т.С., Русановская А.В., Письменская В.А., Белоусова Е.В., Какунина С.А., Норман К.С. Хирургическое лечение эпиретинального фиброза, осложненного псевдоразрывом. Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2015;1:135. [Shkvorchenko D.O., Shpak A.A., Mironova T.S., Rusanovskaya A.V., Pismenskaya V.A., Belousova E.V., Kakunina S.A., Norman K.S. Surgical treatment of epiretinal fibrosis complicated by pseudohole. Modern technologies in ophthalmology= Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2015;1:135. (In Russ.)]
8. Lee S.J., Jang S.Y., Moon D., Choi K.S., Jung G.Y. Long-term surgical outcomes after vitrectomy for symptomatic lamellar macular holes. Retina. 2012;32(9):1743–48.
9. Sun J.P., Chen S.N., Chuang C.C., Lin C.W., Lin C.J., Huang J.Y., Yang C.M., Chen M.S., Yang C.H. Surgical treatment of lamellar macular hole secondary to epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(12):2681–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2364-x
10. Casparis H., Bovey E.H. Surgical treatment of lamellar macular hole associated with epimacular membrane. Retina. 2011;31(9):1783–90. DOI: 10.1097/ IAE.0b013e31820a6818
11. Shiraga F., Takasu I., Fukuda K., Fujita T., Yamashita A., Hirooka K., Shirakata Y., Morizane Y., Fujiwara A. Modified vitreous surgery for symptomatic lamellar macular hole with epiretinal membrane containing macular pigment. Retina. 2013;33(6):1263–9. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31828bcb61
12. Байбородов Я.В. Концепция анатомической реконструкции фовеолы в хирургическом лечении сквозных макулярных разрывов с использованием интраоперационного ОКТ-контроля . Офтальмологические ведомости. 2017;10(3):12–17. [Bayborodov Ya.V. The concept of anatomical reconstruction of the foveola in the surgical treatment of full thickness macular holes using intraoperative OCT control. Ophthalmology journal=Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;10(3):12–17. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.17816/OV10312-17]
13. Байбородов Я.В., Жоголев К.С., Хижняк И.В. Темпы восстановления остроты зрения после хирургического лечения макулярных разрывов с интраоперационным применением оптической когерентной томографии и различных методов визуализации внутренней пограничной мембраны. Вестник офтальмологии. 2017;133(6):90–98. [Bayborodov Ya.V., Zhogolev K.S., Khizhnyak I.V. Rates of recovery of visual acuity after surgical treatment of macular holes with intraoperative application of optical coherence tomography and various methods of visualization of the internal border membrane. Annals of Ophthalmology=Vestnik oftal’mologii.2017;133(6):90–98. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2017133690-98
14. Фокин В.П., Марухненко А.М., Нестерова Е.С., Хзарджан Ю.Ю., Ахмедов А.Э. Прогнозирование результатов хирургического лечения идиопатического макулярного разрыва. Современные технологии в офтальмологии. 2017;1:318– 320. [Fokin V.P., Marukhnenko A.M., Nesterova E.S., Khzarjan Yu.Yu., Akhmedov A.E. Predicting the results of surgical treatment of idiopathic macular hole Modern technologies in ophthalmology= Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal’mologii. 2017;1:318–320. (In Russ.)]
15. Шпак А.А., Шкворченко Д.О., Шарафетдинов И.Х., Юханова О. А. Прогнозирование результатов хирургического лечения идиопатического макулярного разрыва. Офтальмохирургия. 2015;2:55–61. [Shpak A.A., Shkvorchenko D.O., Sharafetdinov I.Kh., Yukhanova O.A. Prediction of the results of surgical treatment of idiopathic macular hole. Ophthalmosurgery= Oftal’mokhirurgiya. 2015;2:55–61. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2015-2-55-61
16. Шпак А.А., Шкворченко Д. О., Шарафетдинов И.Х., Юханова О. А. Функциональные результаты хирургического лечения идиопатических макулярных разрывов. Вестник. офтальмологии. 2016;132(2):14–20. [Shpak A.A., Shkvorchenko D.O., Sharafetdinov I.Kh., Yukhanova O.A. Functional results of surgical treatment of idiopathic macular holes. Annals of Ophthalmology=Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016;132(2):14–20. (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2016132214-20
Review
For citations:
Bayborodov Y.V., Zhogolev K.S., Balashevich L.I., Panova I.E., Mirsaitova D.R. A Retrospective Analysis of the Results of Microinvasive Posterior Vitrectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Non-Full Thickness Macular Holes. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018;15(2S):239-245. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-239-245