Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

Prevention of Fibrous Changes in the Model of Ophthalmosurgical Trauma in the Treatment of Glaucoma

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2024-4-809-816

Abstract

The process of fibrosis in the area of newly formed outflow tracts during surgical treatment of glaucoma leads to a decrease in efficiency. Today, various approaches are used to reduce postoperative scarring. In some cases, the use of certain methods, as well as their combinations, does not bring the expected result. It is proposed to evaluate the antifibrotic effect of adipose tissue autograft in an experiment. This study considers an experimental model for preventing fibrotic changes in surgical trauma during glaucoma treatment.

Objective: Development of a model and experimental clinical and morphological substantiation of the antifibrotic effect of adipose tissue autografting in the area of surgical trauma during glaucoma treatment.

Material and methods. The studies were conducted on 10 eyes of laboratory animals (5 mature rabbits). The animals underwent surgery according to the volume of traumatic impact corresponding to non-penetrating surgery. Two groups were identified: the main group — 5 eyes (the left eye of the animal) surgically treated with the introduction of a fraction of adipose tissue into the surgical area, the comparison group — 5 eyes (the right eye of the animal) without autotransplantation of adipose tissue. The observation period was 1 month. During biomicroscopy on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15 and 30 after the intervention, the characteristics of the surgical area were assessed according to the Würzburg Clinical and Morphological Classification (WBCS). After the animals were withdrawn from the experiment, histological comparison of the tissue areas of the surgical areas was performed.

Results. Comparison of the total index of the Würzburg Clinical and Morphological Classification shows that starting from the 5th day after the intervention, there is a clear distinctive dynamic between the study groups. In the group with the introduction of adipose tissue, there was minimal vascularization of the surgical area, with the original height and width of the formed cushion maintained throughout the observation period. Histological comparison confirms the absence of signs of formation of scar connective tissue in the area of operation in rabbits with autotransplantation of adipose tissue, while in the comparison group rabbits there is a pronounced tendency to scarring.

Conclusions. The experimental model demonstrates the possibility of autotransplantation of adipose tissue into the sub-Tenon space in surgical treatment of glaucoma. The justification for the antifibrotic effect is obtained based on the obtained clinical and morphological data.

About the Authors

V. N. Nikitin
Eye Microsurgery Ekaterinburg Center
Russian Federation

Nikitin Vladimir N., PhD, ophthalmic surgeon of the II surgical department

A. Bardina St. 4A, Ekaterinburg, 620149



D. I. Ivanov
Eye Microsurgery Ekaterinburg Center
Russian Federation

Ivanov Dmitry I., MD, head of the II Surgical Department, Ophthalmic Surgeon

A. Bardina St. 4A, Ekaterinburg, 620149



A. V. Obodov
Eye Microsurgery Ekaterinburg Center
Russian Federation

Obodov Andrey V., ophthalmic surgeon of the 1st surgical department

A. Bardina St. 4A, Ekaterinburg, 620149



A. N. Trunov
Novosibirsk Branch of the S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Trunov Alexander N., head of the scientific department, MD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences

10, Kolkhidskaya str., Novosibirsk, Russia, 630096.



References

1. Weinreb RN, GarwayHeath D, Leung Ch, Mederios F, Liebmann J: Diagnosis of primary openangle glaucoma. The 10th Consensus of the World Glaucoma Association. Moscow: Ophthalmology; 2019. 190 p. (In Russ.).

2. Petrov SYu, Volzhanin AV. Sinustrabeculectomy: history, terminology, technique. National Journal of Glaucoma. 2017;16(2):82–91 (In Russ.).

3. Egorova EA, Yerichev VP. National Glaucoma Guidelines: for medical practitioners. Moscow: GEOTARMedia; 2019. 384 p. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33029/9704-5442-8-GLA-2020-1-384.

4. Kuroedov AV, Abysheva LD, Avdeev RV, Alexandrov AS, Basinsky AS, Blum EA. Intraocular pressure levelsin variouslocal hypotensive treatment for primary open angle glaucoma (multicenterstudy). Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2016;6(1):27– 42 (In Russ.).

5. Avdeev RV, Alexandrov AS, Bakunina NA. Analysis of options for hypotensive treatment of patients with primary openangle glaucoma based on the results of a multicenter study in clinics in six countries. Medical and biological problems of vital activity. 2018;1(19):95–111.

6. Egorova EV, Lyubimova TS, Uzunyan DG, Ivashchenko EV. A method of laser treatment of primary openangle glaucoma after microinvasive nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy. Patent RU 2576811, 12.25.2014 (In Russ.).

7. Kozlova EE, Lyubimova TS, Glatkova EV. Method of treatment of primary open angle glaucoma after surgery of nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy in the eyes with a narrow angle of the anterior chamber. Patent RU 2718319, 08.21.2019 (In Russ.).

8. Kolpakova OA, Fabrikantov OL. A method for selecting the parameters of laser exposure in the treatment of advanced and terminal refractory glaucoma. Patent RU 2707379, 09.27.2018 (In Russ.).

9. Belikova EI, Shvailikova IE. A method ofsurgical treatment of primary subcompensated openangle glaucoma with the presence of a toxicallergic reaction to hypotensive therapy. Patent RU 2735065, 04.13.2020 (In Russ.).

10. Shmyreva VF, Petrov SYu, Makarova AS. The reasons for the decrease in the long term hypotensive effectiveness of antiglaucomatous operations and the possibility of its increase. Glaucoma. 2010;2:43–49 (In Russ.).

11. Babushkin AE. Trabeculectomy: prevention of excessive scarring (literature review). Point of view. EastWest. 2017;4:128–131 (In Russ.).

12. Van Bergen T, Van de Velde S, Vandewalle E. Improving patient outcomes following glaucoma surgery: state of the art and future perspectives. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2014;8:857–867. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S48745.

13. Masoumpour M, Nowroozzadeh M, Razeghinejad M. Current and Future Techniques in Wound Healing Modulation after Glaucoma Filtering Surgeries. Open Ophthalmol J. 2016;10:68–85. doi: 10.2174/1874364101610010068.

14. Petrov S.Yu. The modern concept of combating excessive scarring after fistulizing antiglaucoma surgery. Risk factors and antimetabolic drugs. Ophthalmology. 2017;14:5–11 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2017-1-5-11.

15. Trelford C, Denstedt T, Armstrong J. The Pro–Fibrotic Behavior of Human Tenon’s Capsule Fibroblasts in Medically Treated Glaucoma Patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1391–1402. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S245915.

16. Holló G. Wound Healing and Glaucoma Surgery: Modulating the Scarring Process with Conventional Antimetabolites and New Molecules. Glaucoma Surgery. 2017;59:80–89. doi: 10.1159/000458488.

17. Bikbov MM, Khusnitdinov II. Analysis of the effectiveness of fistulizing operations with drainage of Glautex. breast cancer. Clinical ophthalmology. 2017;17(2):82–85 (In Russ.).

18. Khaw P. Advances in glaucoma surgery: evolution of antimetabolite adjunctive therapy. J Glaucoma. 2001;10(5 Suppl 1):81–84. doi: 10.1097/0006119820011000100029.

19. Balkin D, Samra S, Steinbacher D. 2014; Immediate fat grafting in primary cleft lip repair. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67(12):1644–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.049. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

20. Bollero D, Pozza S, Gangemi EN, De Marchi A, Ganem J,AM, Faletti C, Stella M. Contrastenhanced ultrasonography evaluation after autologous fat grafting in scar revision. Il Giornale di chirurgia. 2014;35(11–12): 266–273.

21. Ribuffo D, Atzeni M, Guerra M. Treatment of irradiated expanders: protective lipofilling allows immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction in the setting of postoperative radiotherapy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(6):1146–1152.

22. Zellner EG, Pfaff MJ, Steinbacher DM. Fat grafting in primary cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(5):1449–1453. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001187.

23. Spiekman M, van Dongen J, Willemsen J, Hoppe D. The power of fat and its adipose derived stromal cells: emerging concepts for fibrotic scar treatment. Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. 2017;11:3220–3235. doi: 10.1002/term.2213.

24. Mazini L, Rochette L, Admou B. Hopes and Limits of AdiposeDerived Stem Cells (ADSCs) and Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in Wound Healing. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020;21(4):1306. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041306.

25. Spiekman M, Francia DL, Mossel DM. Autologous Lipofilling Improves Clinical Outcome in Patients with Symptomatic Dermal Scars Through Induction of a Pro Regenerative Immune Response. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2022;42(4):244–256. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab280.

26. Cattaneo P, Mukherjee D, Spinozzi S Parallel lineagetracing studies establish fibroblasts as the prevailing in vivo adipocyte progenitor. Cell Rep. 2020;30:571–582. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.046.

27. Sowa Y, Kishida T, Louis F. Direct conversion of human fibroblasts into adipocytes using a novel small molecular compound: implications for regenerative therapy for adipose tissue defects. Cells. 2023;10(3):605. doi: 10.3390/cells10030605.

28. Plikus MV, GuerreroJuarez CF, Ito M. Regeneration of fat cells from myofibroblasts during wound healing. Sci (New York NY). 2017;355:748–752. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8792.


Review

For citations:


Nikitin V.N., Ivanov D.I., Obodov A.V., Trunov A.N. Prevention of Fibrous Changes in the Model of Ophthalmosurgical Trauma in the Treatment of Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2024;21(4):809-816. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2024-4-809-816

Views: 174


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)