Preview

Ophthalmology in Russia

Advanced search

ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF PRESBYOPIA CORRECTION WITH APPLICATION OF A BI-ASPHERIC MULTIFOCAL PROFILE ON THE CORNEA BY THE PRK FOR PATIENTS WITH MYOPIA AND HYPEROPIA

https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2017-4-315-322

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the efficacy, safety and predictability of presbyopia correction by the PRK with application of a bi-aspheric multifocal profile on the cornea with PresbyMax software for patients with hyperopia and myopia.

Patients and methods: There were 2 patients group of 25 people each (50 eyes). They were operated with PRK method with application of a multifocal biaspheric profile for simultaneous correction of ametropia and presbyopia. Group I — patients with myopia and presbyopia. Group II — patients with hypermetropia and presbyopia.

Results. In the group 1 year post operation binocular DUCVA was 0,93±0,19, NUCVA — 0,86±0,14, IUCVA — 0,67±0,11. Only two eyes (4 %) lost DBCVA on the 1–2 lines. Target refraction of a dominant eye — emmetropia was 72 % of patients, 28 % observed myopia of –0,75 D. Target refraction of a nondominant eye was –0,75, 68 % had this result, 28 % had deviation –0,50 D of the target refraction, and 4 % — 1,00 D. In group 2 a year post operation binocular DUCVA was 0,96±0,16, NUCVA — 0,77±0,19, IUCVA — 0,64±0,15. Only two eyes (4 %) lost DBCVA on the 1–2 lines. Target refraction of a dominant eye — emmetropia was 72 % of patients, 28 % observed myopia of –0,75 D. Target refraction of a nondominant eye was –0,75, 68 % had this result, 32 % had deviation to –0,75 D of the target refraction.

Conclusions. PRK with application of a bi-aspheric multifocal profile on the cornea using PresbyMAX software and µ-monovision is effective for correction myopia and hypermetropia. Simultaneous correction of ametropia and presbyopia by the PRK method with the application of the multifocal biospheric profile to the cornea with the formation of a slight anisometropia (the concept of µ-monovision) with the PresbyMax software is an effective, safe and predictable method of surgical intervention, both in myopia and hypermetropia.

About the Authors

E. N. Eskina
Laser surgery clinic “Sphere”; Federal State educational institution of additional Professional Education “Institute of professional development of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency”; Federal State Institution “National Medical and Surgical Center named N.I. Pirogov “
Russian Federation

Eskina Erika N. - MD, Professor , The Chief doctor Laser surgery clinic “Sphere”.

Starokachalovskaya str. 10, Moscow, 117628



V. A. Parshina
Laser surgery clinic “Sphere”; Federal State educational institution of additional Professional Education “Institute of professional development of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency”
Russian Federation

Parshina Viktoria A. - ophthalmologist, postgraduate researcher.

Starokachalovskaya str. 10, Moscow, 117628



References

1. Garcia-Gonzalez M., Teus M. A., Hernandez Verdejo J. L. Visual outcomes of LASIK induced monovision in myopic patients with presbyopia. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;150 (3):381–386.

2. Arba-Mosquera S., Alió J. L. Presbyopic correction on the cornea. Eye and Vision. 2014;1:5 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-014-0005-z

3. McDonnell P.J., Lee P., Spritzer K., Lindblad A.S., Hays R.D. Associations of presbyopia with vision-targeted health-related quality of life. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2003;121(11):1577–1581

4. Iribarne Y., Juarez E., Orbegozo J., Saiz A., Arba-Mosquera S. Bi-aspheric ablation profile for presbyopic hyperopic corneal treatments using AMARIS with PresbyMAX module: Multicentric Study in Spain. Journal of Emmetropia. 2012; 3:516.

5. Moussa K., Jehangir N., Mannis T., Wong WL., Moshirfar M. Corneal Refractive Procedures for the Treatment of Presbyopia. Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2017;11:59–75. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101711010059.

6. Frick K.D., Joy S.M., Wilson D.A., Naidoo K.S., Holden B.A. The Global burden of potential productivity loss from uncorrected Presbyopia. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1706–1710. DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.014

7. Baudu P., Penin F., Arba-Mosquera S. Unccorrected binocular performance after biaspheric ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatment using AMARIS with PresbyMax module. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;155(4):636–647. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.023.

8. Uthoff D., Pölzl M., Hepper D., Holland D. A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2012; 250(11):1649–1661. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-1948-1.

9. Эскина Э.Н., Паршина В.А. Результаты коррекции пресбиопии путем нанесения мультифокального профиля на роговицу методом фоторефракционной кератэктомии у пациентов с гиперметропией. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2017;10(2):13-21 [Eskina E.N., Parshina V.A. Results of presbyopia correction with multifocal profile application jn the cornea by photorefractive keratectomy in hyperopic patients. Ophthalmology journal=Oftalmologiceskie vedomosti. 2017;10(2):13-21 (in Russ). DOI: 10.17816/OV10213-21.


Review

For citations:


Eskina E.N., Parshina V.A. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF PRESBYOPIA CORRECTION WITH APPLICATION OF A BI-ASPHERIC MULTIFOCAL PROFILE ON THE CORNEA BY THE PRK FOR PATIENTS WITH MYOPIA AND HYPEROPIA. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2017;14(4):315-322. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2017-4-315-322

Views: 1239


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1816-5095 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0845 (Online)