Valved and Non-Valved Drainage Systems in the Surgical Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-1S-123-126
Abstract
Purpose: to compare the efficacy and safety of Ahmed and Molteno-3 drainage devices implantation in the surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma. Patients and methods. Two groups of refractory glaucoma patients underwent surgery. In the first group (48 patients, 48 eyes) drainage device Molteno-3 with a site size of 175 mm2 was implanted. The average IOP in the group before surgery was 31.9 ± 7.7 mm Hg. The average number of glaucoma medications was 3.3 ± 0,44. In the second group (51 patients, 51 eyes) implantation of Ahmed Valve FP7 model was performed. The average level of IOP in the group before surgery was 34.7 ± 8.07 mm Hg. The average number of glaucoma medications was 3.08 ± 0.4. Results. In the first group the average intraocular pressure level 1 month post-op was 14.6 ± 6.1 mm Hg, 3 months post-op 18.8 ± 5.2 mm Hg, 6 months post-op 16.5 ± 4.7 mm Hg. IOP сompensation (≤ 21 mm Hg) in 6 months was achieved in 91.6 % of cases and in 1 year in 100 % of cases. The total success was achieved only in 8.3 % of patients. However, the number of glaucoma medications was reduced to 1.6 ± 0.8. In the second group the average IOP level 1 month post-op was 21.25 ± 7.3 mm Hg, 3 months post-op 17.9 ± 5.3 mm Hg, 6 months post-op 15.7 ± 4.1 mm Hg. IOP сompensation in 6 months was achieved in 82.4 % of cases and in 1 year in 86.3 %. In the second group complete success was achieved in 19.6 % of patients. The number of glaucoma medications was 1.4 ± 1.1. In the first group complications were revealed in 22.9 % of cases (11 patients). Ciliochoroid detachment was revealed in 9 patients (18,8 %) and hyphema in 2 patients (4,2 %). In the second group complications were revealed in 19.6 % of cases (10 patients). Сiliochoroid detachment was revealed in 4 patients (7.8 %), diplopia in 5 patients (9.8 %), hyphema was detected in one case (1.9 %). In the first group IOP compensation (≤21 mm Hg) was achieved after 6 months in 91.6 % of cases and after 1 year in 100 % of cases. The complete success was achieved in only 8.3 %. In the second group, IOP compensation in 6 months was achieved in 82.4 % of cases and 86.3 % — in 1 year. In the second group, complete success was achieved in 19.6 % patients. There was no significant difference in complications between two groups. Conclusion. High level of safety and effectiveness of refractory glaucoma surgical treatment with implantation of Molteno-3 and Ahmed drains was confirmed.
About the Authors
E. V. KarlovaRussian Federation
MD, PhD, head of glaucoma department
Novo-Sadovaya str., 158, Samara, 443068, Russian Federation
M. V. Radaykina
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist, glaucoma department
Novo-Sadovaya str., 158, Samara, 443068, Russian Federation
References
1. Egorov E.A. (ed.) Glaucoma. National guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2013. 824 p. (In Russ.).
2. Astakhov Yu.S., Egorov E.A., Astakhov S.Yu., Brezel Yu.A. Surgical treatment of “refractory” glaucoma. Russian Medical Journal. Clinical Ophthalmology = Rossijskij medicinskij zhurnal. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2006;1:25 (In Russ.).
3. Bloom P.A., Tsai J.C., Sharma K. Transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of advanced refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997 Sep;104(9):1508–1519.
4. Aquino M.C., Barton K., Tan A.M., Sng C., Li X., Loon S.C., Chew P.T. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan-Feb;43(1):40–46. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12360
5. Alzuhairy S., Albahlal A., Aljadaan I., Owaidhah O., Al Shahwan S., Craven E.R., Mousa A., Edward D.P. Intraocular Pressure Outcomes Following Transscleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation Using Long and Short Duration Burns. J Glaucoma. 2016 Sep; 25(9):e782–e786. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000503
6. Ataullah S., Biswas S., Artes P.H., O’Donoghue E., Ridgway A.E.A., Spencer A.F. Long term results of diode laser cycloablation in complex glaucoma using the Zeiss Visulas II system. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;86(1):39–42.
7. Ghosh S., Manvikar S., Ray-Chaudhuri N., Birch M. Efficacy of transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in patients with good visual acuity. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):375–381. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000389
8. Aujla J.S., Lee G.A., Vincent S.J., Thomas R. Incidence of hypotony and sympathetic ophthalmia following trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma and a report of risk factors. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;41(8):761–772. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12088
9. Ishida K. Update on results and complications of cyclophotocoagulation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;24(2):102–110. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835d9335
10. Pokroy R., Greenwald Y., Pollack A., Bukelman A., Zalish M. Visual loss after transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation for primary open-angle and neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;39(1):22–29.
11. Chuprov A.D., Gavrilova I.A. Analysis of efficiency of various preserving surgeries in terminal aching glaucoma. Russian Medical Journal. Clinical Ophthalmology = Rossijskij medicinskij zhurnal. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2010;4:135–136 (in Russ.).
12. Tahchidi H.P., Metaev S.A., Cheglakov P.Yu. Treatment of refractory glaucoma cases. Comparison of shunt drainages in Russia available (Review). National Journal glaucoma = Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2008;1:52–54 (In Russ.).
13. Rascheskov A.Yu., Loskoutov I.A. Modern technologies of refractory glaucoma treatment. Review. Оphthalmology in Russia = Oftal’mologiya. 2012;9(1):4–9 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2012-1-54-62
14. Christakis P.G., Kalenak J.W., Zurakowski D., Tsai J.C., Kammer J.A., Harasymowycz P.J., Ahmed I.I. The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt study: one-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2011 Nov;118(11):2180–2189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.004
15. Huang M.C., Netland P.A., Coleman A.L. Intermediate–term clinical experience the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;127(1):27–33.
16. Ayyala R.S., Michelini-Norris B., Flores A., Haller E., Margo C.E. Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices: part 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;118(8):1081–1084.
17. Lee C.K., Ma K.T., Hong Y.J., Kim C.Y. Long-term clinical outcomes of Ahmed valve implantation in patients with refractory glaucoma. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187533. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187533
18. Metaev S.A., Cheglakov P.Yu., Alborova V.U., Tillyahodzhaev S.S. Molteno-3 drainage implantation in secondary glaucoma caused by Fuchs syndrome (case study). Annals of Orenburg State University = Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009;12:99–100 (In Russ.).
19. Taglia D.P., Perkins T.W., Gangnon R., Heatley G.A., Kaufman P.L. Comparison of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve, the Krupin Eye Valve with Disk, and the double-plate Molteno implant. J Glaucoma. 2002 Aug;11(4):347–353.
20. Freedman J., Bhandari R. Supra-tenon capsule placement of original Molteno vs Molteno 3 tube implants in black patients with refractory glaucoma: a singlesurgeon experience. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;129(8):993–997. DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.183
Review
For citations:
Karlova E.V., Radaykina M.V. Valved and Non-Valved Drainage Systems in the Surgical Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2019;16(1S):123-126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-1S-123-126