Muller Muscle of the Upper Eyelid: Histopathological Features of Congenital and Acquired Ptosis
https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3S-604-609
Abstract
Purpose: to study the histological features of the Muller muscle of the upper eyelid in patients with congenital and acquired ptosis to understand the mechanism of ptosis.
Material and methods. Retrospective analysis of 27 intraoperatively obtained biopsies of the Muller muscle of the upper eyelid. For the study, the biopsies were fixed in a formalin and prepared by paraffinization. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson, the preparations were studied in a light microscope.
Results. In congenital ptosis of the upper eyelid histologically revealed atrophy of smooth muscle tissue, which manifested itself in a decrease in the number of muscle fibers on the background of fibrous transformation. In micro specimens of patients with acquired ptosis discovered fat cells located among the bundles of smooth muscle fibers, the dispersion of the myocytes. Fat infiltration of muscle ranged from 29 to 51.6 %.
Conclusion The presence of dystrophic changes in Muller muscle in congenital and acquired ptosis was proved by histological method. The revealed features explain the pathogenetic mechanisms of the formation of congenital and acquired ptosis. In the case of acquired ptosis, fat dystrophy is an independent etiological factor, and therefore requires non-standard tactics of surgical treatment in order to neutralize the risk of recurrence in the early and late postoperative periods.
About the Authors
M. G. KataevRussian Federation
MD, Professor, head of the department of reconstructive and plastic surgery
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
A. V. Shatskikh
Russian Federation
PhD, head of the laboratory of pathohistological anatomy and histology of the eye
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
M. A. Zaharova
Russian Federation
PhD, ophthalmologist, researcher of the department of reconstructive and plastic surgery
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
Z. R. Dzagurova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist, post‑graduate of the department of reconstructive and plastic surgery
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
A. V. Shahmatova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist, post‑graduate of the department of reconstructive and plastic surgery
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
N. M. Kataeva
Russian Federation
residency student of the department of reconstructive and plastic surgery
Beskudnikovsky blvd, 59а, Moscow, 127486, Russian Federation
References
1. Beard C. Müller’s superior tarsal muscle: anatomy, physiology, and clinical significance. Ann Plast Surg. 1985;14:324–333. DOI: 10.1097/00000637‑198504000‑00005
2. Kakizaki H., Malhotra R., Selva D. Upper eyelid anatomy: an update. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:336–343. DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e31818b42f7
3. Grusha Ya.O., Fedorov A.A., Blinova I.V. Anatomical and functional features of the upper tarsal Muller muscle. Ophtalmology in Russia = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2004;120(2):29–32 (In Russ.).
4. Morris C.L., Morris W.R., Fleming J.C. A Histological Analysis of the Mullerectomy: Redefining Its Mechanism in Ptosis Repair. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2011;127(6):2333–2341. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e318213a0cc
5. Marcet M.M., Setabutr P., Lemke B.N., Collins M.E., Fleming J.C., Wesley R.E., Pinto J.M., Putterman A.M. Surgical Microanatomy of the Muller Muscle‑Conjunctival Resection Ptosis Procedure. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2010;26(5):360–364. DOI: 10.1097/iop.0b013e3181cb79a2
6. Collin J.R., Beard C., Wood I. Experimental and clinical data on the insertion of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85:792–801. DOI: 10.1016/s0002‑9394(14)78107‑3
7. Kataev M.G., Dzagurova Z.R., Shatskikh A.V. The results of surgical treatment of ptosis of the upper eyelid, associated with fatty degeneration of the Muller muscle of the upper eyelid. Bulletin of the russian academy of military medicine = Izvestiya Rossiyskoy Voenno-meditsinskoy Akademii. 2018;37(2):61–66 (In Russ.).
8. Cahill K.V., Buerger G.F., Johnson B.L. Ptosis Associated with Fatty Infiltration of Müller’s Muscle and Levator Muscle. Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 1986;2(4):213–217. DOI: 10.1097/00002341‑198601070‑00008
9. Gündisch O.D., Pfeiffer M.J. Justierung der Lidhöhe in der Levatorchirurgie bei Ptosis. Ophthalmologe. 2004;101(5):471–477. DOI: 10.1007/s00347‑004‑1004‑6
10. Alshehri M.D., Al‑Fakey Y.H., Alkhalidi H.M., Mubark M.A., Alsuhaibani A.H. Microscopic and Ultrastructural Changes of Muller’s Muscle in Patients With Simple Congenital Ptosis. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;30(4):337–341. DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000000104
11. Baldwin H.C., Manners R.M. Congenital blepharoptosis: a literature review of the histology of levator palpebrae superioris muscle. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:301–307. DOI: 10.1097/00002341‑200207000‑00013
12. Berke R.N., Wadsworth J.A.C. Histology of levator muscle in congenital and acquired ptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;53:413. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1955.00930010415017
13. Lee S., Schwarcz R.M., McCann J.D., Goldberg R.A. Muller’s Muscle–Conjunctival Resection for Correction of Upper Eyelid Ptosis. Relationship Between Phenylephrine Testing and the Amount of Tissue Resected With Final Eyelid Position. Guy J. Ben Simon (Reprinted). Arch facial plast surg. Nov/Dec 2007;9(6):413–417. DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.9.6.413
Review
For citations:
Kataev M.G., Shatskikh A.V., Zaharova M.A., Dzagurova Z.R., Shahmatova A.V., Kataeva N.M. Muller Muscle of the Upper Eyelid: Histopathological Features of Congenital and Acquired Ptosis. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020;17(3s):604-609. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2020-3S-604-609